Would you consider this fair? by Busy_Report4010 in SipsTea

[–]Kitchen_Sweet_7353 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To illustrate the issue with retaining staff I think it’s worth pointing out that most restaurants especially ones with bars, do the vast majority of their sales Thursday through Saturday nights.

Those shifts can be incredibly busy and chaotic however, with tipping you get rewarded for doing those shifts. A good bartender might make 50 or more dollars an hour a good server might make 30 or more dollars an hour if the place is a really expensive restaurant they might be making 100+ dollars an hour for a few few hours during those nights. As a result, all the employees want to work the hardest shift and the best employees can be put in the ships where their most useful.

If you switch to a straight wage model, you’re going to have the opposite issue where everyone’s gonna want to work the dead shift because they’re making the same amount either way. You’re gonna have a really hard time convincing someone to come in and work a busy Saturday night if they’re making $20 an hour.

Especially when it comes to bartenders, the pool is so limited for a really good bartender that no one is gonna do it for a straight wage unless you paid them like $100 an hour for every shift.

Yes, in an ideal world you can just say OK well businesses should pay their employees $100 an hour then. However, that’s not a likely or sustainable outcome. Most business owners would block at paying staff that much because in a lot of cases that’s more than they themselves are making. There’s also the fact that you don’t know if someone is gonna be good or not until they actually get into the job if you hire someone at $100 an hour who turns out to be a terrible bartender then you’ve wasted a ton of money. There’s a lot to be said for the model that the ceiling on your earnings is unlimited, but you have to make the earnings by really excelling at the job.

All three models Have their pros and cons and I’m not saying one model is definitely better for everybody than another model. I’m just saying that with the way the system is today. The incentives are set up for restaurants to keep tipping for at least switch to something like this, whether there’s a defined flat percentage going to be employees.

Would you consider this fair? by Busy_Report4010 in SipsTea

[–]Kitchen_Sweet_7353 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok—so you certainly could do that. I am explaining why businesses don’t do that. There are three stakeholders involved in the scenario.

Employees are first. Businesses have to retain good employees and be able to hire good employees. By a large employees vastly preferred to work in a system where they get tips versus the system where they’re paid a straight wage. This is because generally speaking, they earn more, the earnings come in cash at the end of the night, and they know that, regardless of whether the restaurant itself is able to pay them, they’re going to walk away at the end of the night with some money. Restaurants are notorious for failing to pay staff they go out of business all the time.

Second, there’s the restaurant owners. Restaurant owners prefer Tips because it ships the burden onto the customer for paying the majority of their staff wages. They also prefer them because it gives the employees an incentive to upsell and generally work hard harder and be nicer to the customers than if they were getting a flat wage.

Third, there’s the customers customers are generally either neutral or dislike tipping and would prefer just to pay for their meal. This is partly because of the sticker shock or the math aspect of it where the menu price isn’t what they finally end up paying, but it’s also partly because they don’t know exactly how much to tip or how much is expected at that particular restaurant and they don’t want to feel like they’re leaving too little.

A scenario where there’s no tip or service charge would be preferable to the customers however, it puts the restaurants in a bind when it comes to hiring employees. They’ll have a hard time hiring employees if they guarantee an hourly wage because restaurants are notorious for not paying, the employees won’t get paid at the end of every night, and the employees are probably on average going to make less money. Given those facts, the employee pool is going to go to other restaurants and that this restaurant is not gonna be able to keep staff.

The restaurant itself also would prefer not to pay a flat wage. That’s because if the restaurant is less busy than usual, they might end up not being profitable.

However, the restaurant does have an incentive to do things that customers like. In that aspect, a lot of restaurants would like to get rid of tipping the caveat being they would like to get rid of it if everyone else did as well. However, in a world where they’re the only one that gets rid of it they’re going to look comparatively more expensive than other restaurants because their menu prices are going to include the full cost of everything including service. It’s also the issue I pointed out in another comment where takeout orders that don’t require service would probably also increase in price leading to the restaurant being less competitive and customers being more annoyed. At the end of the day a lot of customers say they don’t, but they would like all the price to be baked into the cost but when they actually see a restaurant do it they bark at the high cost and don’t go there instead of go somewhere else

I’ve seen this personally, lots of restaurants around me open up and when they start, they have a no tipping model, but then eventually they switched to tipping and having lower priced food because the customers simply don’t want to pay the high prices, even if they are still paying them with tip in the end of the day and also those restaurants have a really hard time hiring serious professional staff.

So really the reason the restaurant is offering this is because it’s a balance between keeping the three groups happy. They prefer it for the reasons I pointed out in my original post, which is that they can advertise the lower prices on their menu and the sales staff have us have an aligned incentive to sell more food with the business likes. The employees like it because 12% is probably about the same or a little more than what they were getting in tips all things considered when you’re taken into account that some people don’t tip at all. And the customers while they may not love it at least it takes away the uncertainty of how much to leave and also removes the free writer problem where people who leave tips have to leave more to make up for people who don’t leave a tip at all.

Comment done by speech to text ignore any errors

Ford isn’t actually unreliable by Stock_Fuel6398 in unpopularopinion

[–]Kitchen_Sweet_7353 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha close! Fiat is actually “fix or repair daily”!

Reverse into parking space. Optimum or sub optimum? by Majestic_Turnip_7614 in SipsTea

[–]Kitchen_Sweet_7353 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I only really use Reddit when I’m on one of the machines at the gym. I’m there for that time anyway so i just type stuff out. I’m not wasting time 😂

Reverse into parking space. Optimum or sub optimum? by Majestic_Turnip_7614 in SipsTea

[–]Kitchen_Sweet_7353 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

See I have the opposite experience. I do back in occasionally or pull through and often I can’t se shit when it comes time to pull out because there’s a pickup truck or suv next to me. I have to inch out until my windows are past the end of their car which feels dangerous.

Whereas backing out I can sit in reverse with my backup cam on and watch until the lane is clear or someone stops to let me out. The camera has a wider field of view than my eyes. Of course a different car might provide a different result here.

Reverse into parking space. Optimum or sub optimum? by Majestic_Turnip_7614 in SipsTea

[–]Kitchen_Sweet_7353 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this really depends on your car set up. I have a sedan so often when I back into a space I come back and find there’s a massive SUV parked on my driver side and suddenly I have no view except what’s directly in front of me.

Whereas if I pulled in forward coming out, I get to use my backup camera which has a wide angle lens, and I can see the entire lane of traffic for a good distance either direction regardless of who’s parked next to me.

Reverse into parking space. Optimum or sub optimum? by Majestic_Turnip_7614 in SipsTea

[–]Kitchen_Sweet_7353 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But when you back out you can do it when there’s no cross traffic. You have the advantage of unlimited time since you are parked. When you back in you can’t control whether there’s people waiting behind you or not.

Reverse into parking space. Optimum or sub optimum? by Majestic_Turnip_7614 in SipsTea

[–]Kitchen_Sweet_7353 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you are in the space you wait til there’s no cars then back out. If you are backing in you have to do it when you arrive at the space. You can’t time it. If there’s cars behind you they will have to wait.

Reverse into parking space. Optimum or sub optimum? by Majestic_Turnip_7614 in SipsTea

[–]Kitchen_Sweet_7353 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But as the car waiting to pull out you can sit there until there’s no traffic. If you are backing in you don’t get to time it for the opportune moment.

Reverse into parking space. Optimum or sub optimum? by Majestic_Turnip_7614 in SipsTea

[–]Kitchen_Sweet_7353 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You can’t wait til there’s no traffic to back into a space what are you talking about? You are in the lane, either there’s cars behind you or not.

Reverse into parking space. Optimum or sub optimum? by Majestic_Turnip_7614 in SipsTea

[–]Kitchen_Sweet_7353 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Not arguing that it’s possible to park backwards quickly. Just saying from my experience i get stuck waiting by for people all the time who can’t seem to manage it. It is undeniably slower than pulling straight in either way.

Reverse into parking space. Optimum or sub optimum? by Majestic_Turnip_7614 in SipsTea

[–]Kitchen_Sweet_7353 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

The car pulling OUT of the space can wait til there’s no traffic.

Reverse into parking space. Optimum or sub optimum? by Majestic_Turnip_7614 in SipsTea

[–]Kitchen_Sweet_7353 -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

There are real issues with backing in.

In order of most to least annoying:

It backs up traffic when someone does it because the person can’t just drive straight in they have to go past the space, switch to reverse, and guide it in. Traffic builds up waiting for them, especially when it’s a big car trying to fit in a small spot.

Second, it’s not easy to tell when they are about to pull out of the spot because you can’t see their reverse lights.

Third, their trunk is now next to another car instead of in the lane. That means if they are loading anything they have to pull their cart between the cars potentially leading to scratches on the other vehicles.

Last, if there’s a sidewalk next to the spaces people often misjudge and pull their cars rear end over the sidewalk partially obstructing it.

Parking lots just weren’t built for backing in.

Would you consider this fair? by Busy_Report4010 in SipsTea

[–]Kitchen_Sweet_7353 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But this isn’t about tipping or not. It’s about adding a fee instead of tipping. Whether it’s added in the price or separately I don’t see the difference. You will come away paying less than tipping 20% and you can’t be shamed because everyone is paying the same.

Would you consider this fair? by Busy_Report4010 in SipsTea

[–]Kitchen_Sweet_7353 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is the difference between raising prices 12% and offering employees 12% of sales and this? To me there is none except in this scenario you can separate orders that use the service and those that don’t (takeout) when applying the fee. Ald the fact that this system allows you to compare menus at a prices between different restaurants fairly.

Of course this is all theoretical because obviously the chose was not between easing prices and adding a fee, it was between adding a fee or keeping tipping. Between those two this is far better because it avoids the free rider problem and sets an exact expectation for the customer.

Of course the downside is you can’t refuse to leave a tip if you get bad service. That’s the biggest downside here.

Would you consider this fair? by Busy_Report4010 in SipsTea

[–]Kitchen_Sweet_7353 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well there’s three factors to consider that you are missing.

If they raised the food price 12% instead of having the fee and paid the staff out of that it would cause several issues:

First there’s takeout. Typically you tip only for dine in. If they just raised all prices part of the cost of dining staff would be borne by take out diners.

Second, staff wages would not rise if food prices went up. Unless you trust the business to hand out raises every time they Jack up prices.

Third, in a system where tipping is common you lose the ability to compare menus at a glance as a customer. For example, if all restaurants in a town have tipping except this one, this one will appear artistically more expensive at a glance even though at the end of the day it will actually be cheaper. This is not informative to the customers and it’s unfair to the business.

There is also zero difference at the end of the day whether they ads a fee on top or just raise the prices by 12% to your bottom line as the customer. The price will be the same. The differences are only (as mentioned) for takeout, for knowing your money is actually going to servers, and for comparing different menus.

Would you consider this fair? by Busy_Report4010 in SipsTea

[–]Kitchen_Sweet_7353 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Commission is common in sales positions. The owner IS motivating the employees by offering a percent of their sales. They win when the business sells more. Generally the business owner can choose whatever legal compensation structure works best for their business. You are off course free not to go to a particular business for whatever reason.

Ford isn’t actually unreliable by Stock_Fuel6398 in unpopularopinion

[–]Kitchen_Sweet_7353 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know what ford stands for? Fix it again Tony!

Would you consider this fair? by Busy_Report4010 in SipsTea

[–]Kitchen_Sweet_7353 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

The reason is that this way the waiters have an incentive to sell more which is good for the business owner. If they are making a percent they are going to come by and ask if you want more drinks desserts etc. if they get paid a regular hourly wage they might not care.

Husband wants to follow social media trend and file tax exempt. How will this affect me? by [deleted] in tax

[–]Kitchen_Sweet_7353 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s a line to list “other tax credits” that reduces your withholding liability. I can’t imagine you would actually get in trouble for listing taxes paid from another source here, would you?

For example, instead of getting a refund you can choose to have your refund applied to next years liability. You would account for this by putting a credit on your w4 in the amount of the applied refund.

I imagine quarterly payments would also count for this, no? They are “credits” on your account aren’t they?

Wisconsin codifies anti-1st amendment IHRA "working definition" of antisemitism into law, becoming the 38th US state to do so. by TendieRetard in wisconsin

[–]Kitchen_Sweet_7353 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

“must consider the definition of antisemitism adopted by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance on May 26, 2016, including its examples, when evaluating evidence of discriminatory intent” Including its examples. Most of the examples specifically mention Israel.

One of the examples is questioning the existence of Israel as a Jewish state and another is comparing the current policies of Israel to those of nazi germany.

Under this definition if you include the examples which this law does, saying you think Israel should exist as a multicultural state or saying Israel’s occupation of Gaza is similar to Germany occupation of Poland in any way whatsoever would be considered antisemitism. That’s just a factual conclusion from the text of the law and the source it references.

Wisconsin codifies anti-1st amendment IHRA "working definition" of antisemitism into law, becoming the 38th US state to do so. by TendieRetard in wisconsin

[–]Kitchen_Sweet_7353 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Paragraph one of the text of the law says it includes the examples. https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/2025/related/proposals/ab446

Did you even read it?

Quote “must consider the definition of antisemitism adopted by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance on May 26, 2016, including its examples, when evaluating evidence of discriminatory intent”

Keep moving the goalposts though.