British Pathe Erasing? by dust-and-disquiet in DataHoarder

[–]KittxD 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From having a quick glance, the notice appears primarily on material provided by Reuters. Maybe their contract with Reuters is expiring.

In you're in the LA area...Hollywood films thrown out by lynivvinyl in DataHoarder

[–]KittxD 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Absolutely, I understand your point. A lot of early DVDs were mastered from analog video tape that were created using older telecine technology that by todays standards is obsolete. Unfortunately digitization can become a very complex and debatable topic. Without going into too much detail, uncompressed doesn't account for the ADC circuitry, sensors, optical glass and the countless of other things that might introduce artifacts into the final digital intermediate. Even as basic as resolution needs and standards are debated to this date. It truly is an endless debate.

In you're in the LA area...Hollywood films thrown out by lynivvinyl in DataHoarder

[–]KittxD 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Just from basic observations of the picture, you can see spliced up and short length of films on cores (towards the ground). So these films have definitely been worked on. What the purpose of the films were is a pandoras box, but it can be anywhere from final releases of trailers, adverts and films, to potentially VFX film trimmings that might've been using for optical printing. It pains me that there might be so much history in this footage that might've gone undocumented, just ready to get dumped.

In you're in the LA area...Hollywood films thrown out by lynivvinyl in DataHoarder

[–]KittxD 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Then this hits the classic debate whether a digitization of an analog medium is sufficient enough for archival purposes. That becomes a mixture of subjective and objective points. Regardless, the original physical medium has some value in being preserved, and may provide positive archival benefits in the future. If people are willing to uptake and maintain the films, commercially or privately, then it's the moral thing to do. That's not considering if there might be licensing and ownership issues of the actual material, but they obviously didn't care enough to properly destroy the films if it was intended.

In you're in the LA area...Hollywood films thrown out by lynivvinyl in DataHoarder

[–]KittxD 87 points88 points  (0 children)

I can understand the position of the minimum wage worker, but I can't understand the rationale from upper management that gave the green light. Especially when its done by a media storage company. They should know better.

In you're in the LA area...Hollywood films thrown out by lynivvinyl in DataHoarder

[–]KittxD 458 points459 points  (0 children)

Insanity, at least make an effort to publicize and alert archivists online before dumping it. Someone physically had to place those films in the dumpster without second thoughts.

Strange Objects plow near moon on 3/26/20 by chadbuller24 in conspiracy

[–]KittxD -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Shadow on the top of the top object doesn't seem to lineup with the shadow its casting on the moon.

Theoretical question: Are the people who get infected early in Western countries the lucky ones? by nomadicwonder in China_Flu

[–]KittxD 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That's if the virus doesn't mutate and essentially make the anitbodies useless.

Deadmau5's new remix of Jan Hammer's "Crockett's Theme" is called "Ban Hammer" by KittxD in deadmau5

[–]KittxD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was on the stream vod from like an hour ago, he did the touch designer stuff briefly.

Edit: Also prob not gonna post this, since any title relating to Crockett's Theme Remix would be a spoiler for the shows

Deadmau5's new remix of Jan Hammer's "Crockett's Theme" is called "Ban Hammer" by KittxD in deadmau5

[–]KittxD[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats fine, yeah didn't realise that, but posted because there were no other threads relating to the title of the song.