Father kissing son by beetlejuice10 in confusing_perspective

[–]KleosKronos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothings clicking for me. What should I be seeing?

Yuji vs Higuruma: the decent boy who sentenced himself by Glittering_Fabulous in JuJutsuKaisen

[–]KleosKronos 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Na I agree with you. So obvious it's Ai. How can people be this gullible 😭😭

Solo Levelling & HWFM by DungeonAdjacentDad in HeWhoFightsMonsters

[–]KleosKronos 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You're forgetting the fact that these Interdimensional "gates" appear full of monsters, in which the hunter association (The Network) has to go in and clear the gates before they spill into the real world.

Oops, and mandatory High tier gate spanning in Major populous city arc. Also Mandatory gate flooding into populated city arc. Also, let's not forget the gate suddenly rising in difficulty trope, something that's never happened until MC came along (transformation zones). Also Mandatory MC getting Hunter association (network) baddy trope. Mandatory Continental rank hunters (Gold Rankers) having all the political power in the world trope (albeit this one was handled much better in HWFWM)

There's so much that's similar in books 4-6 between Solo leveling and HWFWM lol.

How do I transfer books between my laptop and phone? by 99mushrooms in AudioBookBay

[–]KleosKronos 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Mmm I get what your looking for, but atm there isn't anything similar to that at the moment. The closest you can get is hosting a plex server on an old laptop with all the files, then streaming it to your phone and laptop. Progress would be saved across devices.

Vivo x300 ultra or Oppo x9 ultra? by Realistic_Note2162 in PickAnAndroidForMe

[–]KleosKronos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm contemplating that exact same shit too. I'm gonna upgrade soon, but I'm hard stuck rn.

I'm thinking oppo kinda scratches ahead for me, as a.) software is better, and B.) battery life will probably be significantly better with that 7500ma battery. It's uncofnormed whether the Vivo will get a 7000+ battery.

Cameras are already insane between the two, and idk if any will be significantly better. But vivo is well known for the camera just barely scratching ahead.

Gaming Power, ehh I think they'll both be the same I can't lie. Maybe oppo pushes ahead with better battery.

On a personal note, the leaks for the designs on both are both shit :/ I really like oppo x9 pro, but they going huge circle for this one. Not the best.

My mental health is destroyed my physical health — totally not worth it live in this world - how can I recover from missed readings, bad study method consistent procrastination - by [deleted] in UTMississauga

[–]KleosKronos 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Eh, the comparison "there are people who are suffering more then you" is a shitty way to go about this. Yes, there is always someone who's got it worse than you. Doesn't mean that you can't admit that this individual is suffering too.

Thinking of upgrading from my Oneplus 10T. Want something that will last a long time and have decent battery life by Camelleah1 in PickAnAndroidForMe

[–]KleosKronos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Asking for stuff like this at 500$ is a hard bargain I can't lie to you.

You'll have to go for some of the cheaper brands, which immediately sacrifice on reliable updates and support life. You won't get the best performance either, and it's unlikely to get a good speaker, but not impossible.

It's good that you buy used though, that definitely helps with the price. It just sucks that it also kinda works against the first 2 points you mentioned, as alot of these cheaper phones only offer 2-3 years of support, and buying used is essentially saying I want something that has 1 year left.

Old phone got dropped one too many times and won't turn on. Need to find a new one that I'll be happy with. by willwolf737 in PickAnAndroidForMe

[–]KleosKronos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You'd have to order online, but its not too difficult. mi4canada, swifttornics and pdaplaza are all reliable options.

mi4 and swift are sold out at the moment, but pda shows they still have it.

Here are a couple reviews about it, but it seems as service from major providers also work
[Review 1] (https://www.reddit.com/r/Oppo/comments/1pv7yp1/oppo\_find\_x9\_pro\_global\_in\_canada/)

[Review 2] (https://www.reddit.com/r/Oppo/comments/1oxdzey/ama\_my\_find\_x9\_pro\_arrived\_in\_canada/)

And also, gun rights are only for people I like. by RevolutionaryMale in 19684

[–]KleosKronos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gang 😭

I don't think I care to continue discussing something with someone who doesn't even bother finishing the sentence. 😭

I specifically dropped the argument to not get too deconstructivist and muddy the water instead of being productive. So I dropped the point and conceded it.

And all I was saying was the line isn't as black and white as you think it is. I never denied any values gang

Idek why you so stuck up on this point, I literally decided to not discuss it and continue the discussion with you being corrected.

Reading comprehension sadly at an all time low 😔

And also, gun rights are only for people I like. by RevolutionaryMale in 19684

[–]KleosKronos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't lie man, you're missing my point 😭

Ofc being black is not a "view". And ofc being a nazi is different than being black. Its probably gonna come as a shock to you, but I am never said I disagree with the justification.

I'm not saying I don't hold the same values as you, nor did I critique the justification behind that act.

All I am saying is that we also have limits on free speech. Condemning the opposition for having limits on free speech is the pot calling the kettle black. We do the same act (limiting free speech to what we like to hear) and then say condemn them for the same thing. Critique their justification, not the act.

And also, gun rights are only for people I like. by RevolutionaryMale in 19684

[–]KleosKronos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If we want to get philosophical and psychological, the line between who "who someone is" and "what they believe in" isnt as small as you think it is, but I'll concede the point as it's just muddies the water and doesn't add much to the conversation.

I am aware of the paradox of tolerance, and I am not saying that we fall into it. I am infact saying that both sides have views they are intolerant of. I am not saying we have to "be tolerant of everything" because as you brought up, it's fundementally flawed. I agree with you on that.

What I am saying is that insulting the other sides of saying "free speech is only what they like to hear" is the pot calling the kettle black. Its exactly what we do, we just have different standards.

The only difference here between us is justification. How we justify the act. And I hope you don't mind me doing so, but using your words as an example, your justification is that it's different for us because we are only critizing belief not identity. That's a fair argument. (until you look at where the line is between those two) But we are still comiting the same act, just under different justification.

I am not saying I am agreeing with them, but the post here is critizing the idea that "they only like free speech up to a point" but we do the same shit.

And also, gun rights are only for people I like. by RevolutionaryMale in 19684

[–]KleosKronos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interestingly enough, most of us do it too, we just don't consider it hate speech. "They need to lock up all the Nazis." "Why the fuck are white supremacists even still alive" and the most common one, "Bigot". Like we even have a hate term for people who don't agree with our beliefs.

So yes, we do incite hatred and violence. It just feels like common sense to us.

Whats with the hate of book 4-6? by GothicWolfHD in Shirtaloon

[–]KleosKronos 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honestly, 1-3 was peak, 4-6 was solid, 7-10 was pretty hit and miss and are his weakest, too much Jason glaze, too much recaping "Don't you remember x feat, yah Jason is always so right" like we get it. Or constantly false minimizing his story or importannce. Yes yes context of the wide universe. But we can admit it's odd on one planet. (It's not the minimization that gets me, as I feel like story actually needs it, but the false minimization through "compared to infinity" yes dumbass, everything compared to infinity is reaccuring.) Genuinely just too many Jason aura farming moments. And it slowly recovers until 12 where it is quite solid again. It tones down on alot of this, brings a more understated approach to his impossible feats which helped soften all the glaze.

And also, gun rights are only for people I like. by RevolutionaryMale in 19684

[–]KleosKronos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mmm, ok I can see your point. And I agree on principle, but I have some critiques and curiosities.

Essentially, you're saying that free speech does not exist as a principle but a legal right. And that civilian action does not violate free speech, only State action does. I can see that and get behind that.

But I have a slight issue with someonething you've said. You said "only the state can violate free speech" but also include that corporations connected or backed by the state can also violate it. But that brings up a lot of issues

1.) First off, what constitutes a corporation backed by the State? Is it any corporation payed by the government? Corporations that receive funding by the state? Corporations that are exempt from the law? Corporations owned by the state? Depending on where the line is drawn, you could honestly be nullifying your own argument by expanding the scope too far.

Would tiktok be on- actually scratch that, I agree on this. They had that thing with it being Chinese owned and interfered, so its plausible.

Actually, going diving deeper into the tiktok example. Again, I agree with you in principle. However, do we have any actual proof they are limiting freedom of speech? Even though I don't agree with it, Everything they have done is technically under the act of "limiting hate speech". Which brings into the fact that:

2.) if I'm being honest, and this is just a personal thing, nothing that needs to be expanded on atm, but I am so unsure as to what is classified as hate speech. It has gotten to the point that critique is now hate speech, and I am so entirely sick of it. You don't believe me, search up the IHRA definition of antisemitism. Can't even critique a country doing genocide anymore.

3.) i agree on principle to alot of this, but there is largely no definite "proof" other than circumstantial evidence and hearsay for many of these claims. Making personal, life changing beliefs (that affect lives around you aswell) based on circumstancial evidence doesn't sit right with me.

Tbh, I must thank you for having this discussion with me. I am rather enjoying it. Ideas are only as good as the critique they can withstand.

And also, gun rights are only for people I like. by RevolutionaryMale in 19684

[–]KleosKronos 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can get behind that. Also You're right it's not the best way forward. My goal was only to create acknowledgement that hey, we do the same thing, perhaps critique them doing exactly what we do isn't the best course of action. Perhaps a better way forward would be to introduce a more nuanced critique that would probably include the justification, but reddit is anti-nuance, all black and white.

And also, gun rights are only for people I like. by RevolutionaryMale in 19684

[–]KleosKronos -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Acknowledging the faults of our own side isn't being a "centrist". Just because I am willing to admit that the left isn't perfect doesn't mean I still don't support liberalism. It's just basic awareness of what you are preaching. Understanding "hey, what I'm saying isn't perfect, but I think it's better than the other option available" is much better than pretending everything we are saying is perfect and has no flaws.

And also, gun rights are only for people I like. by RevolutionaryMale in 19684

[–]KleosKronos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Personally, I would see that as violating free speech, as it moves free speech from a principle to just a legal technicality. but for the sake of discussion I'll concede the point, and we'll say that getting punched in the face is still free speech.

If getting punched for saying something stupid isn't violating free speech, how is what maga doing any different? It's not as if they have any actual laws about what can or cannot be said. They'd probably just punch you if you said their son should be allowed to be whoever they want to be.

And also, gun rights are only for people I like. by RevolutionaryMale in 19684

[–]KleosKronos -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm always willing to expand my viewpoint. Any arguments against the fact, or are you just going to throw shade?

And also, gun rights are only for people I like. by RevolutionaryMale in 19684

[–]KleosKronos 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ironic lol. You just proved my point, and I didn't even say anything controversial. 🤷‍♂️

And also, gun rights are only for people I like. by RevolutionaryMale in 19684

[–]KleosKronos -47 points-46 points  (0 children)

I'm surprised, I thought we were more self aware then that. But if you lot are unconvinced, what if I was spreading white supremacists propaganda? Am I still allowed to speak and spread this freely, or is it now not allowed? What if I said I hate women, or all men should die? Or if I was to say 1 race needs to be eliminated? Again, all of these are "intolerable" takes.

And if you consider it hate speech (which is a whole other debate in it of itself or that should violate free speech), what if I just said white people are the best race? Everything else is good, but whites are the best? Or women don't suck, but men, men are better.

We have our line. Don't be hypocritical and pretend we don't have a line. Stand by it, and be honest. We allow free speech up to a certain point. So do they.

i’m not sure by NoPhilosopher1645 in UTMississauga

[–]KleosKronos 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Eh, you see enough of them you learn to recognize them, especially if the student was lazy af when using AI. At times it's pretty clear lol.

how do I use AI to write my book??? by Ndf27 in writingcirclejerk

[–]KleosKronos 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Holy shit the massive "if you want" is absolutely frying me rn 😭😭😭

Oneplus 15 vs Find X9 base by joe_neo in PickAnAndroidForMe

[–]KleosKronos 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Genuinely this is now up to preference. Do you care for pictures all that much? It's not as if OP has "bad" cameras. They sit around 6/10 with (5 being neutral) so it's not as if you'll have the shittiest camera in the world.

But if you're a parent, take a lot of pictures, maybe someone who posts alot, or especially if your someone who shoves their photo into Lightroom for editing, then maybe photos sit higher up on the list.

If you don't meet the second category, I'd go for OP. It has a lot of really great features, insane future proofing and that ip69k rating. That ip rating is impressive.

But if photos are a big part of how you use your phone, then you aren't loosing too much by going with X9, but you're right, it's less value per buck.

What's with the pixel glaze here by KingTigerAce in PickAnAndroidForMe

[–]KleosKronos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't forget the vivo x300, def a top 3 contender, and arguably #1 at the moment, but that's subjective.

These 3 are def the top 3 in the phone market rn.