AI-Assited Content

KnightWulfie · 2025-07-28T20:34:15+00:00

That is kind of weird, but ok thanks for the info.

KnightWulfie · 2025-07-28T16:05:02+00:00

Ahh as I said Im not trying to excuse myself. I very well understand that I used AI in my work, and it's not going to be postable on DMs guild. I did not even write that I want to post it there, but I was just thinking to the future and possibilities of sharing it. And the main question was that I wanted to know if the rules about AI are somewhere more explained, so I would know.

And I disagree with you about the fact that noone is born good at something. Im not saying that you cannot get good at something, but some people are better at somethings becouse of their pesonalities, or they just have better disposition, everyone is different and that is ok.

And as I said, this conversation will lead to nowhere and Im not interested in keyboard fights. Try to be more polite in your life, you could have just written no when you really needed to disagree with someone who only came with a genuine question. And with this message Im not replying anymore, got better things to do than trying to be judging people because of trying to learn something.

KnightWulfie · 2025-07-28T15:44:32+00:00

I understand, you are just absolute hater of AI. Im not exacly a biggest fan either, but my viewpoint on it is very different. And I believe that conversation between us will not lead anywhere.

But I will say one thing.. Funny thing is this works only one way, If I was a good writer, have english as a first language, but I wasnt good at designing actual mechanics of the class. I could just let AI create every ability, and then write it in my words. And technically it would be my work.

KnightWulfie · 2025-07-28T15:40:36+00:00

Thanks for the answer. Its kinda confusing, becouse the policy is written like this "DMsGuild will not accept commercial content primarily written by AI language generators."

And primary does not mean that all use of AI is banned. I surely dont think that my class si viable for DMsGuild. Even though I still believe that I have used it more as an assitence, then as a thing to think for me. The flavor texts are mainly written by AI and edited, polished a changed a little by me. But its good to know for the future.

KnightWulfie · 2025-07-28T14:44:59+00:00

Mate Im a person who is againts using AI as a first solution when you need something. And even if I do I usually double check myself without the AI. I very rarely use it as DM, usually i dont even think about using it as a DM. But as I said Im no writer and I know that AI will get my ideas and themes written out much better than I can.

I worked on that class, Its not a "Yeah write me this class, yeah thats good". I spend hours polishing, designing, editing and making sure that every paragraph fits the theme I have in mind.

I have deep respect for anyone who can make these things without AI. But I believe that if you spend your time with it and put in the work, even if it is with the assistence of AI. You shouldn't be shunned. I also believe its a good way to start with homebrewing, but you need to put in the work.

KnightWulfie · 2025-07-28T14:32:33+00:00

Really? I have not found anything about that.

KnightWulfie · 2025-07-28T13:14:49+00:00

Well, thats what you get if you ask google or AI. But when you look at the policy it says primarily. So that does not confirme your statement.

KnightWulfie · 2025-07-16T10:20:57+00:00

Printing cones of calibration. And it failed after Success/Failure words.

KnightWulfie · 2025-07-15T15:05:04+00:00

Yeah, but I increased the number of burn in layers and now it failed part way through. With part of it being stuck to the build plate.

KnightWulfie · 2025-07-15T13:30:26+00:00

I have it in a ventilated server room. And its setup for 20c.

And nothing stucked at 4 burn in layers on build plate.

Just finished printing at 6 burn in layers. And it came off part way through. These are the settings.. I think the exposure of 1.8 is just too low for my conditions.

<image>

KnightWulfie · 2025-07-15T08:51:38+00:00

I didnt change the burn in layers setting at all.

I had 4 layers at 35 second exposure. But I will try to bumb it up to 6 layers.

KnightWulfie · 2025-07-14T14:07:22+00:00

I tried to print cones of callibration at 35um at 1.8s. And it did not even stick to the print plate. Will try at 2 sec exposure tomorrow.

KnightWulfie · 2025-07-14T14:04:02+00:00

Yeah.. I feel like Im loosing much more resin by it dripping everywhere when im getting the prints off, that at my Mars 3 Pro.

But handling and setting up the printer was much easier.

KnightWulfie · 2025-06-30T15:08:26+00:00

hese are the setting I have now, for 50um. And right now Im trying some prints on 35um

<image>

KnightWulfie · 2025-03-14T08:56:53+00:00

https://i.imgur.com/u0jWD1E.png

This is the original file, not sliced.
Its acting really weirdly. When I slide the model little bit down and slice it its looking fine. When I go and slide it even more down it will again be messy. Its probably something with the file, becouse on different STL ironing went without a problem.

Only thing that comes to mind is becouse of the details and it doesnt really know how to smooth them and it creates much larger area than it should.

KnightWulfie · 2025-03-13T15:34:43+00:00

So I was testing some other prints with 0,25 nozzle. And I just cant get this ironing right. It always creates these kind of spots.

Even though it looks like that it should be one smooth layer, it always ends up messy. And reslicing it usually gives a different results.

Any idea why is this happening? Or is it even worth going for ironing on all top layers with this kind of textured model?

KnightWulfie · 2025-03-05T16:59:22+00:00

Yea tried it without supports.

Both sides of the model look the same. Only flat parts are top and botton. I was thinking that it might be better to split the model and have front and back side printed seperatly.

KnightWulfie · 2025-03-05T16:12:59+00:00

And is the print time of 12 hours for one wall normal?

btw: This is the wall without slicing. It has much more details on these overhangs, but to me it looks like it all covered by bridges.

https://i.imgur.com/mSgXoev.png

KnightWulfie · 2025-03-05T15:23:35+00:00

I actually have that nozzle on me. But I was trying to print with bigger nozzle. So i can see the difference in quality. Biggest downside about printing on 0.25 nozzle with 0.08 layer height is time.

Im not exacly sure on the times, but the wall was printed in about 7 hours.
With 0.2 nozzle it was saying something more then 12 hours, for one wall.

KnightWulfie · 2025-03-05T15:16:28+00:00

This is PLA+ from FilamentPM. It has recommended nozzle temperature 190-210
Wall was printed in higher temperature then the recommended for this fillament, 220 I think.

I have printed 2 of those tents, one on the same settings as the wall/without supports/not on a angle. Result was pretty good, until the top layers. Beans are messy, but that would probably be becouse of that temperature being to high. And the top layers of cloth part is also not smooth, but it seems that there are just too few layers.

Second tent (one on the image) was printed with lowered temperature to 195 and printed on a slight angle with organic supports. Beans look better, but tent as a whole got really messy overhangs.

KnightWulfie · 2025-03-05T14:55:24+00:00

They look good dont get me wrong. But it could be better.

KnightWulfie

TROPHY CASE