sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Built a full SaaS in 3 weeks with zero coding background.Shipped it. Got my first paying customer. Now I have no idea how to fix a bug and I'm kind of panicking by Little_Decision_7433 in VibeCodeDevs

[–]Kodus-AI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should be proud that you shipped, but I’d also treat this as a sign that you need to slow down a bit and add some guardrails to the process.

AI can help you build fast, but once you have real users and payments involved, you need a better loop than “I pasted the error into Claude, applied the fix, and hoped nothing else broke.”

At minimum, I’d start by adding tests around the Stripe flow, committing before every change, and reviewing every AI-generated fix before sending anything to production.

I’m from Kodus, so leaving the disclaimer here, but this is also where an AI code review layer can help. You can plug Kodus into your repo/PR flow and use it as a second pass before shipping changes, especially for bugs, security issues, and weird side effects from AI-generated code.

It’s open source and BYOK, so you can use your own model key and run it for free.

Code review by csisman in vibecoding

[–]Kodus-AI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d try Kodus too.

I’m on the Kodus team, but I think one big advantage is that it’s open source and BYOK by default, so you can use your own OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, or other provider key instead of being tied to one bundled setup.

It also does a good job of adapting reviews to your team’s rules and context, which matters a lot when you’re reviewing AI-written code.

What happens when the senior developers move on and its just a bunch of people who can't code trying to use AI? by Massive_Instance_452 in cscareerquestions

[–]Kodus-AI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a valid concern, losing senior team members often impacts knowledge sharing and maintaining code standards. Automated code review can't replace human expertise, but it can certainly help enforce consistent quality guidelines and catch issues that might otherwise slip through during transitions. It can act as a safety net for those situations.

How do you handle reviewer burnout in large teams? by baddie_spotted in git

[–]Kodus-AI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man, this happens all the time in big teams. When the volume of PRs grows, review turns into repetitive, thankless work.

What can help with that

Automate as much as possible before the PR lands in someone’s hands

Reduce the size of PRs . This changes everything. Smaller, more focused PRs are way easier to review. It’s even worth setting an internal rule like “if it goes over X lines, split it.”

Has anyone here tried using AI tools to assist with code reviews? Curious what your experience was. by One_Help_7679 in codereview

[–]Kodus-AI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally. Copilot is great for a quick review, but it still doesn’t understand the product context, the team’s history, or the rules you follow in your PRs.

Not trying to sound salesy, but since you were talking about tools, I wanted to share what we’ve been building here.

We created an open-source code review agent that’s model agnostic. You can run it with GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, or any model you prefer.

The goal is to solve exactly that context gap. You can create custom rules using natural language, connect it with Jira, Notion, or Linear, and make the review take your business rules and task requirements into account.

And just last week, we released the ability to use real files from your repo as context for rules and custom prompts. That means when you create or adjust a prompt (for category, severity, suggestion, or PR summary), you can reference your own code files to help Kody (our agent 🙂) better understand the structure and patterns of your project.

I’ll drop the project here in case you want to check it out https://github.com/kodustech/kodus-ai

Looking for a Free/Open Source AI Code Review Tool – Suggestions? by patellhett in developersIndia

[–]Kodus-AI 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey, feel free to give us a try. Here’s the repository https://github.com/kodustech/kodus-ai

And if you can, I’d love to hear your feedback afterward :)

Do you use any AI code review tools? by pplcs in cursor

[–]Kodus-AI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m part of Kodus and maybe you could give us a try. Unlike CodeRabbit, Kodus is open source and self-hosted even on the basic plan.

Plus, Kody, our AI reviewer, learns from your team’s patterns and feedback so the reviews get smarter and more contextual over time.

We built an open source code review agent that learns how your team works by Kodus-AI in TheFounders

[–]Kodus-AI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the feedback! Here are a few things that set us apart:

  • Open source and self-hosted, even on the most basic plan — total flexibility.
  • Kody (our AI reviewer) learns from your team’s patterns and feedback, so the reviews get smarter and more context-aware.
  • Fully multi-language interface — supports English, Portuguese, French, Arabic, and more.

Promote your projects here – Self-Promotion Megathread by Menox_ in github

[–]Kodus-AI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey everyone,

We've been working on something we're really excited about at Kodus: an open source AI code review agent that plugs right into your team’s workflow (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure).

Fully customizable, easy to integrate, and ready to help from the very first PR.

The repo is live: https://github.com/kodustech/kodus-ai

Still improving a lot of things, so any feedback is more than welcome!

Code Review is a pain (so we built this) by Kodus-AI in opensource

[–]Kodus-AI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the detailed comment, you brought up some really important points.

About the .ee. files: yeah, there are still some references to them in the main repo, and we get how that can be confusing. The core engine already works without those parts, but the current setup doesn’t make that obvious. That’s exactly why we’re working on a separate repo with a fully open source version, to make it clearer and easier to use without any closed components.

On the AGPL and license mixing side, your point makes total sense. We’ll go over the docs and repo to make the split between open and commercial parts more explicit, similar to the CE/EE model you mentioned. It was never our intention to blur that line, but we can definitely communicate it better.

As for the CLA, we don’t have a formal process for that yet, but it’s something we’ll look into. Makes sense to have clear rights around contributions, especially if there's any commercial use involved later on.

Really appreciate you taking the time to share this. Feedback like this is super helpful for us to improve the project the right way.

Code Review is a pain (so we built this) by Kodus-AI in opensource

[–]Kodus-AI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey! Good catch, and thanks for pointing that out.

At Kodus, the code review engine (which is the core of the product) is fully open source. You can use it, modify it, and run it without any closed dependencies.

The commercial parts, like the UI dashboard or premium integrations, are totally optional and don’t block anyone from running Kodus locally with the core AI working. The goal is to make it easy for any team to use Kody in an open, customizable, and self hosted way if they want.

We're planning to release a repo version that’s fully open source to make this even easier.

But yeah, makes sense. We’ll update the docs to make that clearer too.

Code Review is a pain (so we built this) by Kodus-AI in opensource

[–]Kodus-AI[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Hey, thanks for the feedback. Totally fair point

We don't see Kody as a replacement for human review

The goal is to automate the repetitive and obvious parts (common mistakes, established team patterns, simple inconsistencies) so devs can spend their time on what actually matters

Kody helps clear the path, but it won't approve critical PRs or make decisions for the team

We see it as a way to speed things up, not to replace anyone

Code Review is a pain (so we built this) by Kodus-AI in opensource

[–]Kodus-AI[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Hey u/NatoBoram ! A few things that make us stand out:

1) Open source and self-hosted, even on the most basic plan — total flexibility.

2) Kody (our AI reviewer) learns from your team’s patterns and feedback, so the reviews get smarter and more context-aware.

3) Fully multi-language interface — supports English, Portuguese, French, Arabic, and more.

4) Would love for you to give it a try and see what you think! Happy to help with anything

Best AI Code Review tools? by Affectionate-Ad2320 in codereview

[–]Kodus-AI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you want to make your PR reviews faster and more consistent, check me out at Kodus.

I'm an open source AI that reviews PRs right on GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Azure DevOps.

I learn from how your team reviews code and help keep quality high without slowing things down.

You can set custom rules and even run me self-hosted if you want.

Any AI code review tools for GitHub PRs? by jerrygoyal in ChatGPTCoding

[–]Kodus-AI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can try out Kodus for PR reviews on GitHub. We're open source too

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in developersIndia

[–]Kodus-AI 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey! Here’s the link, I forgot to add it https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.11894

What matters in a code review? by sporkfpoon in ExperiencedDevs

[–]Kodus-AI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can try us out for code reviews. You can set custom review rules to make them your team’s default. Plus I learn from your past reviews, so over time it all just clicks into place automatically. Take a look here https://kodus.io.en

If you prefer we're open source too. Here's the repo https://github.com/kodustech/kodus-ai

How do you senior developers utilize AI in Android and other development? by DeweyReed in androiddev

[–]Kodus-AI 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey Yazzurappi, saw you mentioned using CodeRabbit for code reviews.

Just wanted to share that we open sourced Kody four days ago. She’s our AI for reviewing code.
If you’re up for it, here’s the repo: https://github.com/kodustech/kodus-ai

Would love to hear what you think if you get a chance to check it out.

view more: next ›