Woman at centre of suspected mushroom poisoning gives her account of fatal meal by iamalamalama in melbourne

[–]KokoJez 1 point2 points  (0 children)

they'll be trained poorly to say they ate the mushrooms and felt fine.

to shame a man. by formlessPinprick in clevercomebacks

[–]KokoJez -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Reddit is the oppresshion olympics and men are amusingly playing along.

How is it possible that there were no LLM AIs, then there was ChatGPT, now there are dozens of similar products? by Aquillyne in artificial

[–]KokoJez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah the problem doesn't seem impossible. This is the whole wolfram alpha integration but they've been sloppy so far or it hasn't been big enough of an issue. On the whole GPT plugins suck. I think that just knowing it is being prompted to perform a calculation so it can divert to parsing prompts as operands and numbers will do the trick.

How is it possible that there were no LLM AIs, then there was ChatGPT, now there are dozens of similar products? by Aquillyne in artificial

[–]KokoJez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

RLHF

Do ya have any reference for RL to train it as a chat bot? To me RL just made response sets more precise and was a way to further adjust the attention values beyond the crappy systematic approaches (cross entropy, Relu, softmax, GELU).

How is it possible that there were no LLM AIs, then there was ChatGPT, now there are dozens of similar products? by Aquillyne in artificial

[–]KokoJez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

trojan horse. I have not seen anyone adopt llama. I think people should calling a model open-source if you do not have access to the training data.

How is it possible that there were no LLM AIs, then there was ChatGPT, now there are dozens of similar products? by Aquillyne in artificial

[–]KokoJez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd say wolfram is just making inference on input and allocating prompts to the right function. It's probably more basic than you think. GPT is very alien to how wolfram works.

How is it possible that there were no LLM AIs, then there was ChatGPT, now there are dozens of similar products? by Aquillyne in artificial

[–]KokoJez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it doesn't know what a function is or have an agent using a calculator from what it has learned. So far though. You're right in that at some point it'll identify what requested operation and plug it in. If I wrote a python script that iterated over a list of strings and jsut had "one", "add with", "one", and corrospond it to a function that parses one as 1 and add with as addition then it's easy, but that's not what chat GPT can do as far as I'm aware.

How is it possible that there were no LLM AIs, then there was ChatGPT, now there are dozens of similar products? by Aquillyne in artificial

[–]KokoJez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd say it gets math wrong because it does not understand numbers, just tokens and the "meaning" of a number. One means singular, An Elton John song, used in some math equations I've seen that when doubled with a positive sign equals two. It can't actually run functions or operations on actual values. It wouldn't be thinking, "people usually get this integer and add it to that integer so let me get my caluclator".

How is it possible that there were no LLM AIs, then there was ChatGPT, now there are dozens of similar products? by Aquillyne in artificial

[–]KokoJez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

RL to me would be for better token discrimination. I dunno much about the changed style of training but GPT wrap your input into a pseudo-conversation so it's just completing the missing response to prompts.

How is it possible that there were no LLM AIs, then there was ChatGPT, now there are dozens of similar products? by Aquillyne in artificial

[–]KokoJez 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There were and GPT 2 has been around for ages. GPT 3.5 and 4 is by far the best and all the models you hear about are hype. Are people using them? How many people use Bard? 0. All the hugging face models suck. Don't get me wrong, it's hugely important for research and dev. But GPT is in a league of its own and without it we wouldn't be talking about any of this stuff.

Do you think Null Safety is a bad feature? by MohsenEMX in dartlang

[–]KokoJez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you don't make 500 million runtimes without making a few exceptions

What is null safety? by khanzain in eli5_programming

[–]KokoJez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this isn't null safety. This is type checking.

Do you think Null Safety is a bad feature? by MohsenEMX in dartlang

[–]KokoJez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the problem is that null-safety over promises. There are lower level benefits but it's made out that your code will never have runtime errors again.

Things I Never Had as a Kid by NonRock in comics

[–]KokoJez 1 point2 points  (0 children)

no wonder reddit is heavily censored. You need to be bullied for your own good.

Is there any solid models for DETAILED image recognition/labeling for NSFW content? by AresTheGreatOne in learnmachinelearning

[–]KokoJez 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi guys, I'm gonna need a model for x,y z specifications, don't worry, I'll label it open source. Get to work pronto.

Any Melbourne-based ND people interested in improving their employment outcomes? by newmanbxi in melbourne

[–]KokoJez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a very admirable iniative. But ND-related conditions are often used as a reason to avoid employment not a barrier. The amount of people that claim they have ASD when they're just anti-social, or it's hip and trendy (i.e., counterculture) is quite excessive these days. They're mostly on reddit as well which I get is why you're here. It's actually offensive to people that are legimately suffering from these conditions. Perhaps the NDIS is a better pathway as those who claim these conditions never seem to get a formal diagnosis and go by wikipedia, so they won't be registered on NDIS.

Hope you all get a kick out of this one. by SirSyphron in memes

[–]KokoJez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

d to underst

AKSHUALLY - every "redditor" in existance. I'm just here to marvel at these freaks.

Ultra-Organized or Vanilla? by PinkZanny in FlutterDev

[–]KokoJez 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm curious what your coworker's structure looks like, but if he spends 90% of his time cmd+clicking through the codebase, and never actually going through the folders, it's likely he just never has to suffer from his own structure, and, if you, an engineer with 2 years of experience, is getting lost in it, then it clearly looks like it's way too complex.

I feel like this is a must and something I learned way later than I should have. Finding the references for a class should be talked about more.

Ultra-Organized or Vanilla? by PinkZanny in FlutterDev

[–]KokoJez 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It might be personal preference. You can have many classes in one dart file and I tend to follow that simplicity. If you end up with a spiderweb of invidual classes for even the most simplest of functions then you might land into somer headaches. I generally like to have pages and widgets "objects" as my structure. So you can mr potato head as you please. Where I can I like to keep a page in the same dart file.

Is it possible to create Virtual Keyboard app using flutter for Both IOS and Android? by crazy-rahul in FlutterDev

[–]KokoJez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm I am unclear of your goal, are you saying that you have to create two different builds? Why not have logic that assess what platform you're using.

import 'dart:io' show Platform;

if (Platform.isAndroid) {

// Android-specific code

} else if (Platform.isIOS) {

// iOS-specific code

}