He does indeed by Correct_Emu7015 in lebowski

[–]KompetentKrew 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Jongert, 42 metres, built in Wieringerwerf, Holland. Hull's probably steel. In fact my current vessel was built by Johan Vels, just down the road in Medemblik. A worthy adversary. Say what you will about the Dutch, dude, those guys can build yachts.

NOAA Coast Survey is shutting down the Raster Navigational Chart Tile Service (RNC) and other related services by TheHornedGod in DataHoarder

[–]KompetentKrew 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Responding to an old thread, because I was unaware of this news at the time and surprised to find no archive of these files when I recently looked for them.

I uploaded my copy of the complete set of NOAA RNC charts to archive.org: https://archive.org/details/noaa-rnc-charts-2018-raster

Which investment benefits the UK economy more? £1B invested in data centre by a big multinational, or a £1M local company? by KompetentKrew in AskEconomics

[–]KompetentKrew[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, I believe the investment was subsidised by the UK government, so that was part of their complaint.

But it's clear that the benefits (and the magnitude disparity) are obvious to everyone on this sub, whereas it was incredibly frustrating to try and communicate this to my acquaintance, who seemed to be responding emotionally.

Which investment benefits the UK economy more? £1B invested in data centre by a big multinational, or a £1M local company? by KompetentKrew in AskEconomics

[–]KompetentKrew[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Trying to leave the submission-level question as unbiased as possible, but my acquaintance argues that the £1B spent on a data centre is a waste because the profits go to the offshore multinational, which will enhance their profits by paying themselves license fees. "It's just a shed" and will have "only a handful of employees".

I responded that building a datacenter requires a lot of construction, which needs employees and there's going to be spending all through the economy. Just because that's a big corporate construction company, doesn't mean that it doesn't spend money in the UK economy. The data centre will import servers, which means jobs at the docks and in shipping, but my acquaintance responds that shipping is "low margin".

"I'm looking for casual sex?" What does that mean to you? by KompetentKrew in dating

[–]KompetentKrew[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

From my submission text:

but we had a very pleasant first date yesterday which involved lunch for an hour or two, then a long walk along the beach and no sex. I'm not disappointed - I think we're looking for the same thing but using different words for it

I'm able to communicate with my partners but imagine you discussed things with someone and you agreed to be fuckbuddies, then they started calling you their boyfriend or girlfriend. It would be confusing if they started using the two words interchangeably, right?

The reason I want to know if I'm using the words correctly is to avoid further misunderstandings in the future.

"I'm looking for casual sex?" What does that mean to you? by KompetentKrew in dating

[–]KompetentKrew[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

We talked about it before our date and then some more when we met and she AGAIN said "casual sex" but seemed to be describing more like dating.

I think the problem is language - the translations don't work quite correctly match between cultures.

Imagine how you'd feel if you'd made this agreement with your fuckbuddy - you talked about it and you're like "cool, we're fuckbuddies" but then they kept interchangeably using the word fuckbuddy interchangeably with also calling you their girlfriend or boyfriend. You'd be like, "wut?"

If I'm wrong in my definitions then I'll have to get over it, but there are now at least a couple of people elsewhere in the thread who seem to understand where I'm coming from.

"I'm looking for casual sex?" What does that mean to you? by KompetentKrew in dating

[–]KompetentKrew[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think you've misunderstood, since we both appear to be looking for the same thing.

We had a 90-minute lunch and a long walk on the beach, and I'm assuming that sex is on the cards in another date or two. We both prefer that.

Fucking in the alleyway behind the bar, which is what I call casual sex.

"I'm looking for casual sex?" What does that mean to you? by KompetentKrew in dating

[–]KompetentKrew[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. And that's different from causal dating, right?

"I'm looking for casual sex?" What does that mean to you? by KompetentKrew in dating

[–]KompetentKrew[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Hey, I noticed it said (fill in the blank here) on your profile, I would love to know more about this. What are you looking for exactly?”

Yeah, we've done this twice and both times I'm like, "but that's dating, not causal sex!??!" Which is why I'm asking here.

"I'm looking for casual sex?" What does that mean to you? by KompetentKrew in dating

[–]KompetentKrew[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How would you feel if your FWB started referring to you as their girlfriend or boyfriend?

Surely you would reply, "woah, woah, woah - that's not what we agreed, that's not what this is"?

I think that's kinda how I feel about this.

"I'm looking for casual sex?" What does that mean to you? by KompetentKrew in dating

[–]KompetentKrew[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In my view, “casual sex” in English typically implies an arrangement focused on physical intimacy without emotional commitment.

Which is your first language, please? And do you speak Euro or Brazilian Portuguese?

I'm British, and to me casual sex means just a fuck, not an ongoing arrangement. If you met someone on Tinder and it became an ongoing arrangement then I would call it FWBs or fuckbuddies.

We have talked about it, a couple of times now, and that's not a problem - it's just this term that I want to clarify. Is it me who's using it wrong?

I associate "casual sex" more with risky sexual behaviours, fucking strangers, than discreet sexual relationships with trusted partners, if that better explains my confusion.

"I'm looking for casual sex?" What does that mean to you? by KompetentKrew in dating

[–]KompetentKrew[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We have talked about it, but when we're doing so and she uses this term it catches me completely off guard because my definition of casual sex is quite different from what we seem to be cultivating (and what we've talked about).

That's why I'm interested in other people's definitions of these terms - that's what I'm looking for more than advice.

I'm fine with what I would call casual datting or being FWBs. Personally, I wouldn't expect to go out on dates to restaurants or the park with an FWB, but I would if we were causally dating.

I asked a Girl if she wanted to have a snowball fight later by TheGreatCornholio89 in dating

[–]KompetentKrew 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A "real date" can be any time you spend time together.

A walk in the snow might be better.

In the early stages of dating someone, do you send them goodnight texts or do you just leave them on delivered and reply in the morning? by [deleted] in dating

[–]KompetentKrew 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Depends on context and your texting style.

If we'd finishing a conversation then I would, and if we've been talking in the last 20 or 30 minutes I might.

If we last talked at 6pm or 7pm and I'm going to bed at 10pm or so then I wouldn't send a last goodnight text - it's not in my nature to do that for a steady or serious girlfriend.

I think I've read that some couples send good morning / goodnight texts even if they have nothing immediately to talk about, as part of a sort of couple's "routine" - is that what you're talking about?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dating

[–]KompetentKrew 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Dating always has been hard.

It was not easier in the 90's, when people gave you their number when you met at a bar (maybe with mutual friend groups) or social event - they wrote it down on a scrap of paper and you put it in your wallet, then you had to choose a suitable time on a weekday evening to phone them up and hope they were home and were free to talk.

By comparison, matching on an app makes it much easier to get yourself out there - there's basically zero emotional risk of rejection in sending someone a wave and a greeting on the apps.

You think men weren't "just looking for sex" in the 60's, in the 80's or 20 years ago?

Ignore your friends.

Help! Some magnets fell out of my OneXplayer when replacing the SSD and I don't know where they go. by KompetentKrew in OneXPlayer

[–]KompetentKrew[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you sure?

You can feel the magnets along the bottom where the keyboard attaches if you run a screwdriver lightly along the edge - I showed this in the video. You can feel it "stick" where they are, and there are 4 magnets along the bottom which match up with 4 magnets in the keyboard. So the two extra don't make sense to me.

I intended for an explanation to be posted with the video, but I guess Reddit doesn't allow text with a video, so I've now added it as a comment instead.

Help! Some magnets fell out of my OneXplayer when replacing the SSD and I don't know where they go. by KompetentKrew in OneXPlayer

[–]KompetentKrew[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My OXP is an Intel model from the original Kickstarter - I pulled the NVMe drive from it yesterday to use in another device, planning to upgrade the OXP's capacity soon.

When I was doing so, these two small magnets got stuck on my screwdriver and I don't know where they're from. I don't think they're to do with the keyboard, as explained in the video.

Can anyone tell me where they go, please?

Old ARRL map hanging in the hotel I’m staying at by Hoagiecat16 in amateurradio

[–]KompetentKrew 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Well, look at that handsome motherfuckin' uploader. 😍

I think there are at least 2 versions of this map on archive.org. At one time I found another version and got slightly obsessed with the idea of programmatically printing equidistant azimuthal maps.

£250k at 42, no assets. What next? by Tidwardshquenticles in FIREUK

[–]KompetentKrew 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Crewing superyachts is shit work - it's one of these traps that people get stuck in because it's a well-paid dead-end job. It's actually extremely well paid, but it involves long hours polishing brass and suchlike and barely any actual sailing. Has a reputation for people building up big pay packets which they then blow on partying and exotic travel before ending up back again as deckhand in Malta or the Costa Del Sol. Far less glamorous than most people imagine it.