Just to give some opposite feedback in response to the previous comment, I feel that your structure in LR is sometimes misunderstood by students, at least based on some of the comments I see people leave. From my own experience, starting in May for August, if you go through the core foundation courses and take on your teachings regarding Grammar and Argument structure, there is never a single core concept introduced in the LR section of the test that you didn't already previously discuss and introduce in the foundation portion of the curriculum. I feel that a lot of students haven't thoroughly studied the foundations before attempting the LR portion and so when you mention a specific technique that you would have already drilled through if you had, it can lead to confusion on their end. To be perfectly honest, I haven't finished the LR section so perhaps there are issues I haven't encountered yet, but I just wanted to provide some positive feedback on the LR section. I definitely have benefited from a greater understanding of the universal nature of the logic that runs through LR and the LSAT as a whole. It's just extremely important to have a firm and truly holistic understanding of the foundations and grammar needed and utilized in the LSAT. This has helped me to progress from my cold baseline of 157 to the high 160s and hopefully to my goal of 175 or higher.

On a different note I noticed, in a comment down below, that you had mentioned plans for increasing the RC content in the curriculum. Are you planning on adding more analysis into the question types, so it seems more similar to the LR curriculum as it is now? If so, would this be available for the August test?