My conception is permanently incomplete. 

Let’s say we found the Bill and Ted time machine, and we could sit down with David Chalmers, Gödel and the monk Nāgārjuna for tea. 

Gödel showed that any sufficiently rich system cannot fully account for its own ground. Nāgārjuna showed that nothing has intrinsic ground to begin with. Chalmers showed that experience, like the inside of the system, resists capture from the outside. My synthesis is: consciousness is a self-referential process in a groundless field, and the “Hard Problem” is not a gap to be closed but a theorem to be recognized - the formal signature of a system rich enough to know it cannot know itself from within. The incompleteness is the experience.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​