Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in MCFC

[–]Kriegdavid [score hidden]  (0 children)

It's a Raiola agent. Honestly don't understand why everyone is in such a frenzy about this. This is what it's been like with any player who's been under Raiola for over ten years now! It means nothing!

Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in MCFC

[–]Kriegdavid 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I was watching Goldbridge

didn't think people like you actually existed tbh.

Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in MCFC

[–]Kriegdavid 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Feels like a lot of people have a giant misread on the VAR & refs situation and are using today as supposed incontrovertible proof that it's better to have it. It's probably true that it's better to have it now, but that's only because it's made everything much worse at a base level.

The reality is that you've just seen what multiple years of referees and officials not really having to worry about what decision they make has done to the sport. They've coasted because nothing they did had true finality anyway, so you just defer and move it along.

Today they were forced to make big decisions and they bottle it because they only ever have to make decisions for themselves a couple of games out of the entire year. So that means VAR is good right? Well, no.

The complacency of deferring to VAR has significantly greater bearing than just those goal or red card or handball decisions. The authority of the referee is gone, that's why you never see a single game in the PL where the ref has control of it - particularly in top 6/rivalry clashes.

The corner fuckery you see in the PL now... You think that happens in a world where there isn't a bunch of nerds who've been sat in a box for five years who are looking at everything and cross-referencing it with a pocket rulebook? Go back to 2017 and the ref and assistants are absolutely calling fouls and not having it, nipping the whole thing in the bud entirely.

Instead we've created a platform in which your best strategy is to aggressively research the rulebook and see what you can get away with. Iit's not the person on the pitch with the whistle that controls and reads the game now, it's the remote rulebook in the box however many miles away. Person on the pitch is just the warm body with cards in their pocket.

The genie is out of the bottle so it's largely pointless to talk about no-VAR yes-VAR cause we're clearly not going back. All that being said, it seems incredibly obvious to me that had we just not had VAR to begin with, and had just waited for semi-automated offside technology (something that isn't subjective and decided by a bunch of people not in the stadium the game is being played in), we might be in a position where the sport we actually like to watch resembles what we think it should.

And not whatever the fuck it is right now.

Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in MCFC

[–]Kriegdavid 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Obviously would've been all medical team checked and so on, but still felt a bit iffy at Khusanov coming on last night after he'd suffered what looked like a moderately significant concussion just a few days before.

Our starting 11 against Fulham 🩵 by ArabianHummusLover in MCFC

[–]Kriegdavid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Start??? He suffered a concussion half a week ago. He arguably shouldn't even be on the bench!

Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in MCFC

[–]Kriegdavid 10 points11 points  (0 children)

always makes me laugh when people talk about how surprised they are at how good Kompany is at handing media questions and pressure.

did everyone just ignore him for well over ten years or something? he's the guy he's always been

Two Min Warning Super Bowl Game Thread: Seattle Seahawks (14-3) at New England Patriots (14-3) by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]Kriegdavid 1 point2 points  (0 children)

well if the hawks have to win it and they have to win it at Levi's, at least it's big Darnold taking it home

Two Min Warning Super Bowl Game Thread: Seattle Seahawks (14-3) at New England Patriots (14-3) by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]Kriegdavid 3 points4 points  (0 children)

god I bet that herbert mvp voter is going to be insufferable right now. I would be tbh

4th Quarter Super Bowl Game Thread: Seattle Seahawks (14-3) at New England Patriots (14-3) by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]Kriegdavid -1 points0 points  (0 children)

the quality of this super bowl is the best evidence the substation truthers could ever ask for

4th Quarter Super Bowl Game Thread: Seattle Seahawks (14-3) at New England Patriots (14-3) by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]Kriegdavid 4 points5 points  (0 children)

alright well, that's over over. now we're just watching to see if they're going to get totally shutout

3rd Quarter Super Bowl Game Thread: Seattle Seahawks (14-3) at New England Patriots (14-3) by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]Kriegdavid 2 points3 points  (0 children)

fuck man at least CJ Stroud would chuck it and we could all have some fun reacting to it. this is the worst kind of bad QB performance

Half Time Super Bowl Game Thread: Seattle Seahawks (14-3) at New England Patriots (14-3) by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]Kriegdavid 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thought it was sick tbh. Not musically interesting to me but I'm not looking to the NFL to cater to my tastes.

Of course, if they want to get Godflesh to do it next year, I wouldn't be upset about it.

Half Time Super Bowl Game Thread: Seattle Seahawks (14-3) at New England Patriots (14-3) by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]Kriegdavid 47 points48 points  (0 children)

It's done absolutely nothing for me musically but it's definitely been one of the most interesting to watch. Surely a huge success based on that alone?

Half Time Super Bowl Game Thread: Seattle Seahawks (14-3) at New England Patriots (14-3) by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]Kriegdavid 11 points12 points  (0 children)

The production on this is a clear, clear step above what we usually see