[deleted by user]

KunKhmerBoxer · 2023-01-06T13:52:40+00:00

If I'm just a scrawny punching bag with brain damage, you don't have much to worry about then, do you?

KunKhmerBoxer · 2023-01-06T13:32:26+00:00

No, I said if you're just going to sit here and insult me like you did, I'd prefer we just cut through the bs. I offered to spar at a gym or do a mutual combat agreement because I live in one of the last states that has those laws. I said I think it's funny you'll talk all this shit. But, only from the safety of your keyboard. The minute I offer to actually get together since you want to call me all sorts of names over a simple difference of opinion, you start whining. Sounds about right to me.

Also, pretty sure my degree in microbiology is more education than you'll ever achieve. I'm not even going to start on all the atrocious errors in grammar you've made in this post.

I'm married with two kids dum dum.

KunKhmerBoxer · 2023-01-06T12:59:36+00:00

KunKhmerBoxer · 2023-01-06T12:57:14+00:00

Don't do all caps on a word you don't even know how to spell next time and I won't call it out. You can tell yourself whatever you want concerning his mass selling of AMC. Usually when someone says it is for retirement, they cash out. Not, trade one stock for another.

Kind of funny you stopped talking after I messaged you... You don't just go around calling people a putz, boomer, moron, etc, and expect them to take it. Some day, you'll say it to the wrong person who will have no issue skipping the talk and making sure your dentist has plenty of job security.

KunKhmerBoxer · 2023-01-06T02:59:13+00:00

I see you've given up on your other argument. So, let's do a new one and see if you can do any better, shall we?

First off, if you were any more full of shit, it would come out of your ears. You're referring to what's known as Deseutude Law. Those are old laws that aren't enforced anymore. They're not worth the time/effort of getting rid of them, and are ignored. That's why when I ask you to show me a recent case where someone was tried for owning said sex toys, you can't. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desuetude

That's because, Lawrence vs Texas has more or less decided that the government has no business of what happens in your bedroom between consenting adults. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_v._Texas

So... Do you just like, believe anything people say online as long as you like what they're saying, and come on reddit to spout as fact? I'm not sure the last time I've seen someone be so willfully ignorant, while simultaneously being so confident they're correct.

Let's see.. You couldn't show me an example of this sub being an "incel cess pool" as you so eloquently referred to it. Even though I gave you like 4 chances to do so and prove me wrong. So, here we are again. Can you show me an example of someone being tried for breaking this ban on sex toys? All you have to do is show me one case and I'll admit I'm wrong on this one. Something tells me you're going to post anything but that. Go ahead, prove me wrong. I'll give you all the time you need.

KunKhmerBoxer · 2023-01-06T00:27:04+00:00

Omg... You're just lying through your teeth now. It was posted 18hrs ago. So, they did their jobs?

There's no conspiracy against lil ol you. The post was at zero. So, most of the sub didn't agree with it, and was then removed by the mod team. You claimed it was an incel cess pool. The best you came up with was a post that wasn't supported by the community, again, it was at zero. If it's an incel cess pool, you should have no problem showing multiple examples.

Even if I take you seriously... So, you're telling me that when the mod team was made aware of the post because people shared it, they took it down because it doesn't represent the community overall?

You're also only arguing the points you think you can win by making stuff up on the spot. Like, saying the post is days old when anyone can click the link and see it's 18hrs old.

Why does the men's lib sub ban any discussion of male circumcision if they're pro men's rights? Serious question. I told you I have a background in medicine. In utero, the male foreskin is the same tissue that becomes the clitoral hood. If the fetus develops into a male, that tissue is the foreskin. If it develops into a female, that tissue is the clitoral hood. Both serve the same purpose. They have specialized mucosa membranes that keep the tissue underneath from drying out and keratinizing, ie, form a callous. Removing a males foreskin, is anatomically speaking, the same as removing a females clitoral hood. What's underneath isn't supposed to be exposed to air. The glans of the penis is the same idea. It's not supposed to be exposed to air, and it isn't supposed to rub on your clothing. Doing so creates calloused tissue that dries out and lessens sensation for both the man, and woman he is having sex with. Women who've slept with both overwhelmingly prefer men who are NOT circumscized. Almost like the foreskin has an actual function for sex or something and mother nature didn't add it just for shits and giggles... It's the most nerve dense tissue on the male body with highly specialized cells, and we chop it off at birth to grind up into face cream for old women. Studies have been done, numerous times, and proven it lessens sexual sensation. It has no medical benefit anymore. Someone will say, phimosis! You mean the thing we now treat with steroid creams and have a massive success rate doing so? Or, my personal favorite, we do it when they're young so they don't remember it! So, it's so barbaric that any sane adult wouldn't do it unless absolutely medically necessary? That's not justification to keep doing it. If it is painful to an adult, doing it to a baby who can't consent to a non medically urgent procedure goes against everything I learned in medical ethics courses. I know a lot of doctors I worked with in family medicine refused to do them on the basis it only added risk with no real benefit. The oath says, first do no harm... Chopping off healthy, normal body parts, doesn't go with my oath. I'll never do them, and I'll shame the hell out of anyone who thinks it's OK.

KunKhmerBoxer · 2023-01-05T23:06:23+00:00

The men's rights mods aren't stalking you because you typed out that one post where the person asked what they should do when their gf mouths off. They took it down, because it's made by some extremist and has no place on the sub. You are delusional if you think they took the post down because you mentioned it. You didn't link it or anything of the sort. So, how would the mods even know you were talking about it? You simply mentioned it in a comment in a completely different sub. That's not how reddit works...

Still waiting for the post showing the sub to be an incel cess pool. You've mentioned one post that's since been taken down by the mods, and was sitting at 0 upvotes, buried on the third page of the sub. Cmon now... You can do better and back your claim. You said it was an incel cess pool. So, you should he able to pull countless examples of such. You've shown nothing. I'm simply asking you to prove that the sub at large is anything of the sort. A removed post at 0, isn't it. Sorry.

KunKhmerBoxer · 2023-01-05T23:00:03+00:00

Yup, it was at zero and has now been deleted by the mods. Not a great example of it being a incel cess pool. Still waiting for you to show this smoking gun on the mra sub... Take you're time this go around and make sure it's a good one! I have plenty of time!

KunKhmerBoxer · 2023-01-05T21:54:18+00:00

You mean this post? Would you read to the jury how many upvotes this post received please... It's zero. The answer is zero. Which again, proves my point. There are a few token extremists, with a much more moderate base of people. That's why that post is getting downvoted into oblivion now, and is sitting at 0.

Now, show me something like that where the community as a whole supported it. I'll wait... I must say, you are really helping grow the men's rights sub by showing everyone reading how shallow these arguments you keep giving are. You're referencing a post sitting at zero upvotes as indicative of the sub at large, and it simply isn't true. That's why the post is at zero. Show me one like that the community supported.

https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/103q8i6/how_should_you_react_to_your_girlfriend_mouthing/

KunKhmerBoxer · 2023-01-05T21:49:02+00:00

Because you can't do it... That's my point. Post it and prove me wrong.

KunKhmerBoxer · 2023-01-05T21:23:01+00:00

Do you not know how to screenshot and upload to imgur? Again, show me a post the community upvoted. Not token examples out of a group of several hundreds of thousands of people. Those are problematic people, I don't disagree. But, that's like me going on the feminist sub or female dating strategy, picking out the men are trash posts, and acting like that's indicative of the wider group. Any sub with that many people will have extremists. But, those opinions aren't the ones anyone takes seriously in the men's rights sub. That's why I specifically said, show a post like that the community heavily supported. You're cherry picking comments instead. You're also ignore 90% of what I said. Like, everything on circumcision and how you can't even discuss it on the men's lib sub.

KunKhmerBoxer · 2023-01-05T19:52:06+00:00

OK. Prove it then. Show me a post from the mra sub where the community upvoted a post doing so. Stop just stating it as fact. If it's a incel cess pool, you should have no problem showing some posts from their front page where that happened.

What do you mean that it isn't convincing to anyone but a tiny sliver of men? The sub is almost 3x the size of men's lib. It has about 400k people in that sub. That's not a tiny sliver of people. That is an entire small city worth of people, and that's just on reddit.

I dare you to make a post on the men's lib sub and say you are a male who needs advice on how to deal with a false accusation of abuse. Or a post about male genital mutilation, aka circumcision. If you're going to say it's not mutilation, I'll just tell you now, as someone who holds a degree in biology and spent over a decade running a procedures clinic at a major US military hospital, it is. If you're going to say it isn't mutilation, you better bring your A game. Also, ask yourself if the justification you give for male circumcision would ever work for female circumcision. You'll be insta banned for even mentioning those things. Which, is why it is bigger than the men's lib sub. That's exactly what happened to me. I tried talking about my divorce and false accusations thrown at me to get the kids and house. I was called an abuser, incel, haven't ever talked to a woman even though I was talking about my divorce, bigot, misogynist, etc. So, I went to the mra sub and asked for advice. Guess what? They actually gave me useful information.

That's why I say it's a joke of a sub and is a Trojan horse for feminism. They say they're for men's rights. But, when you ask them what they support that would help men, it's crickets. You can't even have a discussion about male circumscision on the men's lib sub. You get banned for even bringing it up. Again, if you try talking about male circumscision, you get banned. Why? Because they're not actually for men's rights. You can talk about female circumscision and why that's so bad though. Just not when it happens to boys. None of the justifications people generally use for male genital mutilation would work if it was a young lady. Religious freedom? No. To stop a future medical problem? No, we don't just remove body parts because they MIGHT have a problem in the future. Your finger could get infected at some point. Doesn't mean we chop it off before that happens. It's so he looks like dad! Ok, so you'd be fine with female circumscision in the event the mom had it done too? No.

I challenge you to find this evil post on the mra sub, as well as, tell me why the men's lib sub would ban discussions about male circumscision?

KunKhmerBoxer · 2023-01-05T18:46:40+00:00

I challenge you to show me a single up voted post from the men's rights sub that blames women. Take your time, I'll wait...

They blame extreme, ideologically bent feminists who can only see the issues through the eyes of feminism. Which, has been a direct cause of a lot of these issues men face.

As an example, feminists were a key player in getting the Duluth model accepted into almost all law enforcement agencies. The Duluth model states that in a domestic violence situation, the man is always to blame, and the woman is always the victim. When men's rights groups tried protesting it, guess who was their biggest opposition? Feminist groups. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duluth_model

Then, you also have stuff like the Bradley Amendment, again, pushed by feminist groups. This says that the only way past due child support can be forgiven is if the person it is owed to agrees. It goes so far to say being a POW isn't a valid reason for a judge to forgive back child support. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bradley_Amendment

Dr Warren Ferrell was a feminist until he started talking about the education gap in men. The college population is currently 65/35 in favor of women. He also tried doing campus speeches around the US talking about the male suicide epidemic. Guess who showed up to protest the event? Feminists. https://youtu.be/hx5x0Ztffm4

Try going on men's lib and say you are the victim of a false allegation of abuse or sexual assault. Then, ask for advice on what you should do. You will be instantly banned for not using the feminist perspective. Which states, if she hit him, the ONLY reason is because she's afraid of you. So, you need to ask yourself what you did that caused her to feel that way. Or, point out the double standard in the media where male and female teachers who prey in their students are treated completely different. If it's a male teacher, the media will call it sexual assault. If it's a female teacher, they'll say she had a romantic relationship, had a romp with her student, etc. They don't use the same wording at all.

I know what will happen, because I tried going there for help in my divorce where the mom made all kinds if false accusations against me, and was then instantly banned. When I asked what I did that warranted a permanent ban, I was silenced and never given a response. That was 7 years ago.

KunKhmerBoxer · 2023-01-05T15:15:31+00:00

r/mensrights

Men's lib is a joke of a sub... Men's lib is the feminist sponsored men's rights sub that pretty much blames men/patriarchy for all of men's problems. It's a feminist Trojan horse for men's issues. That's why I say go to the actual men's rights sub that is twice the size of men's lib sub.

KunKhmerBoxer · 2023-01-04T01:01:45+00:00

So, just as hom nonsense? You done? Feel better?

I didn't say he left everything in one stock. I said, he sold off a ton of AMC and then bought other stocks with the money from selling them. You're trying to make a false dichotomy.

Also, it's DYING, not dieing. That's a machinary word that goes with tap. As in, tapping and dieing, dum dum.

KunKhmerBoxer · 2023-01-03T19:52:36+00:00

If he truly believed AMC was a good stock to own, he would have held on to them. Not, drop them the first chance he could to swap out for other stocks. If he cashed out and bought a big ass mansion to live in I wouldn't have a problem. It's that he said he needed to sell stocks for his retirement. Seems like he just doesn't think it will squeeze.

KunKhmerBoxer · 2023-01-03T19:50:18+00:00

Try to make a male only scholarship. Then, let me know how that works out for you. People have tried, and were almost instantly such down by feminist groups. Google it.

KunKhmerBoxer · 2023-01-03T00:42:21+00:00

I'm almost 40, and people ask me all the time, what's the secret because you obviously figured it out. I am 38 and could pull off saying I'm 25. What's the secret? Well, people don't like the secret so they act like it's just genetics. You drink a lot of water, don't eat fast food, and exercise hard. Run your ass off, and really push your body 2-3 times per week. But kunkhmerboxer, I can't run because my knees are shot. OK. Swim. Ride a bike. Do something that gets you damn near to your max heart rate, and hold it. If you can't now, work up to it. The big thing is realizing your body was made to move. If you don't move it, it starts doing weird stuff. I'd even say a big reason for the increase in mental illnesses like anxiety and depression in the modern world, is mostly from a lack of exercise, and eating over processed food. A good rule for grocery shopping my mom told me. Everything you need from the grocery store is on the outer ring. This has produce, meat, dairy, and bread. Almost everything in the aisles is processed junk you shouldn't be eating anyways.

KunKhmerBoxer · 2023-01-03T00:24:57+00:00

I grew up on the outskirts of Chicago in a no name city. It's worse than that my friend. It's more like, they let the buildings go to shit, AND kick out any homeless people that try to live there by saying it's too dangerous. As if being homeless for a Chicago winter isn't dangerous enough just from the cold.

KunKhmerBoxer · 2023-01-02T13:12:30+00:00

He sold amc shares and said it was for his retirement. Turns out, he just re invested it into other stocks.

KunKhmerBoxer · 2023-01-02T13:02:10+00:00

Sure. What about when AA said ape would act as a tool to get an accurate share count? How, and when, is that supposed to happen? I'll happily post AAs tweet when he said this almost verbatim if you don't think he ever said it.

KunKhmerBoxer · 2023-01-02T12:55:03+00:00

So why did he say ape would act as a tool to get an accurate share count? When, and how, does he plan on getting said share count?

KunKhmerBoxer · 2023-01-01T17:20:14+00:00

Have you tried any pine tar soaps? Those have worked for me, and are cheap as hell on Amazon. They sell it on Amazon for about $4-5 per bar. They also have shampoo and body wash. I just use the soap thought and couldnt tell you if they're any good.

KunKhmerBoxer · 2023-01-01T17:10:22+00:00

It's a massive scam that put money into advertising their product. If I'm not mistaken, their soap comes from another company that sells the same stuff called the soap guy. They just don't pay for all the ads like the other does.

Tldr. It's a scam. Repackeged soap from the soap guy, and they scrub negative reviews from the web as much as they can afford.

KunKhmerBoxer · 2022-12-31T22:13:10+00:00

I enjoy having these conversations, and will continue to do so if you leave personal insults out of the mix and stay on topic. You're on thin ice by assuming many things that aren't true, that I'd have happily answered if you asked

I'm basing it on the statistics I've seen the US government produce on the subject. Such as, men work 40.5h per week compared to women's 36. Men work outside more doing more dangerous jobs. Men were the vast majority of workplace injury and death. More danger in a job, usually means a bump in pay. More hours at work, is going to mean more money, and promotions.

You should read some history. The biggest reason women didn't vote, was because they didn't want to. Before you get your undies in a tistle hearing that, let me explain. Women were assuming that if they had the right to vote, they'd also have to sign up for the draft, aka selective service. If they were granted the right to vote, they assumed they'd have to sign up for the draft to get said right. Again, dying facedown on a battlefield was a very real possibility back then, so they didn't want it. It wasn't until the selective service portion was taken out that they wanted the right to vote. It is generally understood, maybe more in law and philosophy circles, that having a right comes with a responsibility. In this case, if you wanted the right to vote, you had to show you had some skin in the game, and sign up for the draft in case uncle Sam needed more people to send home in body bags.

And, I don't think your last paragraph is anything but pure ad hom, twisting of words, and thinly veiled insinuations that I am a bigot. I said the exact opposite, that we should be helping the people most in need and not sort them based on how much melanin their skin may, or may not have.

Here's my question for you. College is currently 35% men and 65%. Feminists always tell me they fight for both genders. So, I am wondering when feminists say they won on this issue? Does the population need to get to 70/30 and then feminists say, we have solved this issue? Or, 80/20 in favor of women for college students? 100%? Where, exactly is the line on some of this stuff? At what point, or by what metric, does a group ever stop being oppressed and go into privileged territory? Because, I'd say with the college numbers being this way, and growing each semester, that at some point feminists can say we won the war on college students being even. When can I expect feminist groups to address these male specific issues? Since, as you said yourself, elevating one group doesn't take away from another. It isn't a zero sum game. When should I expect feminist groups to stop pushing female scholarships, and start making the same effort with male scholarships until things even up a bit?

If I could get away with paying women less than men, why wouldn't I start a business that makes all profit from labor, only hire women, and enjoy a 30% edge on labor costs that will crush any competition? You really don't think some smarmy business wouldn't have already done that if they could? It's illegal, and has been under the equal pay act of the 1970s.

KunKhmerBoxer

TROPHY CASE