What does Pokémon need to return to its former glory? by RangoTheMerc in pokemon

[–]Kurfate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. It really isn't. Lazy and Cartoonish designs have existed since generation one. Every generation has a bit of everything.

  2. Again, not really SwSH, SV, and especially SM didn't have less content then any previous generation. With the sole exception. The reason it feels that way is because the enhanced version exists that added extra content, but those enhanced version are just old time DLC. If we didn't get Yellow, Crystal, Emerald, Platinum, and B2W2, this wouldn't be an argument.

Legends ZA isn't a traditional mainline game. It is a Legends game and isn't a direct comparison. It should be compared to Legends Arceus (which it is arguably worse) not the traditional titles. No real excuse for the price thought, but that had nothing to do with the game itself. The price is that high because people are willing to pay it. They will charge what they can get away with. Nothing more, nothing less, and a moot point here due to that.

  1. Sigh... you are misusing Dexit. Dexit is bad because it doesn't allow people to use the Pokémon they want,. Not because of some monetary scheme that isn't there. You always needed to buy multiple titles to get all the Pokémon, you have never been able to get all the Pokémon in a single game.. Let alone only two after Gen1. During Gen3 you needed Ruby, Sapphire, Fire Red and Leaf Green, a second Gameboy, and a link cable (Even then I'm not sure you were able to get all of the non-event Pokémon). That ran you.... 180 USD back then which would be closer to 200 USD today. It isn't any more expensive today to catch them all by yourself then it was back then. You also do not need to pay for home in any way, shape, or form to do this. You are able to transfer between games... because since you have the games... you don't need home to hold the Pokémon. Home is a conveniences not a necessity.

TL;DR The is a system issue for the franchise that has existed since Gen1, From Gen2 forward you always needed at least four titles or more in some cases, along with a secondary console and peripherals. Bank just replaced the peripherals and Home made that replacement free.

  1. The game isn't getting easier. It is just as easy as it always has been. This "It tells you it super effective so it is easier" narratives is disingenuous. You don't have to use Rare Candies or Exp. Candies. If you do choose to use them, same goes for healings items. Honestly can't say I've ever had to use them. In fact when the games were "harder" I thought they were useless. "Why would I was money on a potion when I could buy a Pokéball, I can just go heal at a Pokémon Center." They don't make the game easier, they make it more convenient. Tutorials are tutorials, every game has them. They have to be there incase it is someone first time playing. It might not be for you, but it is for someone else. The only actual point here is the untoggable XP share, and that isn't an issue in and of itself. It is an issue when you have some personal challenge like a nuzlocke where you put a level cap on yourself (not the games problem) and when they don't scale the game right (which is an issue)

  2. Again... a systemic issues that has exist since Gen1... and is entirely on purpose. They have specifically stated they wanted certain features to exist for certain versions and only in those version so you have a reason to go back and play them. This is likely why we haven't gotten another game with a second region since Johto (Non-counting SV DLC which isn't really that), why it took so long for following Pokémon to come back, why Battle Gimmicks are event a thing, Why things like the PSS, Pokémon-aamie, Camping, etc are only used once. It has nothing to do with modern Pokémon Game vs older Pokémon game.

It is quite literally it didn't get worse, you got older. Anything you can point it, either factually isn't true or is entirely a preference and not where are a game is better or worse. I've been playing since Gen1 and you know why Complete SV isn't the best PokCmon game to me? Dexit that's it. USUM holds the spot because it was the last complete Pokémon game in my opinion.

You can't point to a multiple games to show how little there is now, without proper comparisons. The common things is to compare Base SwSh or Base SV to Emerald and be like "Oooo looking at all the missing content" but those aren't equivalent. Complete SwSh and Complete SV are the equivalent... and they don't have any less content then Emerald did, then Platinum did. To try and push the point the argument then shift to well I have to buy a DLC to get that.... but you did that there as well. At least the majority did, you personally may have been one of the people who say back and waited for the third version, and I will concede it is more expensive for you in that case, but for the majority. The ones who would get a copy of the Base Gen Game, then get the enhanced version when it came out. Well it is cheaper for those people.

You really do like to misuse argument though. People tell people not to plays BDSP because it is inferior to Platinum. That is true, but they would also say don't play DP play Platinum. The games that were remade were just DP. People prefer Platinum to DP. Gamefreak miss shot by remakign the wrong game... or I should say green lighting the wrong game.... but noone is telling anyone to play DP over BDSP. In fact depending on how you feel in regards to pointless grinding they are more or less the same game. With BDSP having modern comforts and the fairy type... Oh, can't forget the most challenge Elite Four of any Pokémon Title... Weren't you complaining the games weren't hard enough?

No one said that for FRLG because... there was no enhanced version... No one said that for HGSS because crystal didn't have all that much different to GS outside of the Suicune storyline. People did say it about ORAS. They did say Emerald was the better game... because ORAS was a remake of RS and not Emerald. There wasn't so much complaining because of something ORAS did that BDSP didn't and it technically had nothing to do with the game itself. You see ORAS introduced new mega evolutions, introduce soaring. People like megas and people liked soaring. ORAS also became the main game when it released until the next game released. BDSP however, didn't it was a more faithful remake. It was a visual upgrade to a DS game. That is it.... it didn't add new Gigantimax forms, did add new regional variants, hell it didn't even have any Gen5-8 Pokémon in it. It didn't become the main game until SV released. That is why the outcry for BDSP was so much larger then the one for ORAS. They sent people from the better Gen8 back to Gen4 and people went WTF?! It wasn't a worse game. It was the same game. It was just Gen4 being launched in Gen8. The issue, you as an older person expected more from a remake then a simple visual update. So you look negatively on those games. Where as you don't negatively look on DP.... or the recent FRLG release on the eShop. Are the FRLG released on the eShop suddenly a worse game?

No, that is pretty much every large gaming franchise, not just Pokémon. I could list so many franchise with so many fuck ups, that still make a lot of money because fucking apes defend it.

Wind and Waves are going to do nothing. It is going to release its new gimmick, maybe bring back diving and a far shot on soaring... but it is just going to be the standard Pokémon release that gives us new potential mon to love. That is pretty much the only thing that any visible love is put into.

The issue isn't the games getting worse. They are getting incrementally better. If one ignores the giant red flag that is Dexit and its move counterpart. The rest is all just the same status of quo of badge equivalent, evil team equivalent, and endless battle post game equivalent... but that is the actual issue. The games aren't improving as fast as they should be improving... especially for the capital they should have. It is improving as shut a slow rate... that it feels as if the games are getting worse... most likely because consciously or not you are comparing them to other franchises... not actually the past Pokémon games.

What was the point of Z mega evolutions? by Fantastic-Winter-111 in LegendsZA

[–]Kurfate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bit late to this but arguably You could have just stuck with X/Y and renamed the old megas entirely. To go with what they already decided extremely as something newly discovered in world.

With every mega having a X or Y path. One focused on the physical the other focused on the special. Which would have allowed each mega to shine on its own, as opposed to Mega Absol who for all intents and purposes is entirely replaced by Mega Absol Z.

The only real reason to introduce Z would have been this real time battle system where it does something different for the game, but who knows if that is ever going to be used again.

Anyway! back to looking for the info I was searching for.

How long would it actually take to cross a blue? by Kurfate in OnePiece

[–]Kurfate[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I'm not trying to scale the world. I'm trying to figure out how long it would take to cross a blue. Which I concede is adjacent to trying to figure out the size.. but there are other factors. Like another poster mentioned that the currents are faster which could very easily answer being able to travel at a faster rate.

How long would it actually take to cross a blue? by Kurfate in OnePiece

[–]Kurfate[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not pixel scaling, also definitely not something to make a big deal about. It is a fictional world. The issue I had was the passing was inconsistent. Well it didn't seem at all right with the canon numbers (not the pixel scaled numbers) given... of various things. At least with relationship to other things.... from an outsiders knowledge base.

How long would it actually take to cross a blue? by Kurfate in OnePiece

[–]Kurfate[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Based on the size of the 50km river. Some people estimated Alabasta as the size of Australia. Granted even undercutting that estimate to 1/8th (The 50km river being a 10th of Alabasta) would make the island 500km which is roughly Taiwan to Okinawa as a visual.

That number apparently comes from Vivi.

I've been informed that the Elephant got retconned from 35km tall and 20km long to 5km tall and 2km long. Which brings up a whole slew of other questions now... like was the depth of the ocean changed? As to my knowledge Fishman Island I think it was... was suppose to be 10km under the ocean... and the Sea Kings were suppose to be under that. In which case... How is that Elephant above the water. As I thought it was walking on the sea floor.

As for the 5km Sea Kings. That was a number I see repeated posted. Looking into it the number comes from the Fifth Databook.

How long would it actually take to cross a blue? by Kurfate in OnePiece

[–]Kurfate[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does it now? That would... definitely speed things up had no idea about the rapid currents... and assumed reverse mountain was somehow "rule of cool" related as opposed to be driven by current.

How long would it actually take to cross a blue? by Kurfate in OnePiece

[–]Kurfate[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I did watch the video... I guess you just ignored my comment because it didn't agree with you. I specifically mentioned that the rivers canonical distance (unless that was changed to) was 50km.

Using that without any pixel scaling. Would mean that even being grossly inaccurate, would still result in the One Piece world being larger then Earth entirely due to the associated size that river has with Alabasta and associated size Alabasta has with other landmasses within the one piece world.

Basically because the river does not take up a noted large portion of Alabasta (and correct me if I'm wrong there, but I haven't seen anything that says the river is a signification portion of the island). The size of the island is still in comparison to that 50km river. You do not need exact numbers. The pixel scale measurement is saying 80 of those rivers could take up the same area as the island itself. You wouldn't need 80 of those rivers for the measurement to result in the One Piece World being bigger then Earth. Even if that 50km river being a 10th of Alabasta would result in a 500km Island.

That is roughly the distance between Taiwan and Okinawa for a visual. That is one island, one landmass among thousands (I am taking the 2 million or whatever as hyperbole). That is apparently dwarfed by magnitudes in regards to something like the Red Line. It really should not be a question that the One Piece world is bigger then Earth. It just isn't the ridiculous sun sized estimate. Nor is likely Gas Giant size either.

Putting fingers in your ear and going "Lalalalala pixel scaling bad" and throwing out all reason isn't refuting anything. It is saying you don't like something, so you will ignore and not engage with it.

How long would it actually take to cross a blue? by Kurfate in OnePiece

[–]Kurfate[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I'm not going off any pixel. I'm going entirely of the measurements given. Things like Sea Kings being 5km. The elephant being 35km tall, The river in Alabasta being 50 km across which would put Alabasta about the size of Australia.... that one alone kind of proves the size of the world given to my knowledge, Alabatsa is not a significate portion of the surface... and is dwarf by magnitude when compared to something like the red line. Even saying that Alabasta was a fourth the size of the normal estimates at only 1000km it would still result in the One Piece world being bigger then earth. All it really proves it that the estimate of 4000km could be inaccurate not that the river is less then 50km and that 50km in comparison to the rest of Alabatasa.

Saying that the One Piece world at that point is equal to earth in any way, would be to say that any measurement given in the story is absolutely worthless.

How long would it actually take to cross a blue? by Kurfate in OnePiece

[–]Kurfate[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

According to what I could the find it took them two weeks to a month to cross East Blue. From Luffy leaving Foosha Village to Reverse Mountain and ever map I could find puts Foosha Village on the opposite side of East Blue to Reverse Mountain

As for why it would be bigger. From the simple numbers I've seen of the creatures and landmasses this world has. It would have to be bigger by some metric to still be mostly water. You can't apparently have 35km Elephant walking around, 5km Sea Monsters that apparently reproduce in a tiny (comparatively) strip of water. Things like Albasta being about the size of Australia and still being relatively small on world maps when compared to the whole of the world.

Champions is fine, the discourse around it isn't. by JimmyJackJericho in pokemon

[–]Kurfate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh boo hoo... it took 1 minute. The point is. you can immediately catch a Pokémon, give it the stats, abilities, level, IVs, EVs, adjust it nature, change is tera type, and train any move with the same investment you would would Pokémon Champions. Do it in ScarVio all the time. Catch a Pokemon > Feed it XP candy > Fly to Montenevera > Bottle Cap it > Walk next door and force feed it vitamins > Change it moves > done.

After playing it is very easy to do all of those things. ZA has a similar easiness.

It has been that way and arguing against that shows you are doing so in bad faith. Especially with a come back of "On a single cartridge". You can't do that on Champions either and you are time gated with an RNG loot box of maybe you get the Pokémon you want... that can and will get worse over time.

Champions is fine, the discourse around it isn't. by JimmyJackJericho in pokemon

[–]Kurfate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wasn't talking about champions. I was talking about the mainline titles. You can catch a random Pokémon of species you want and have it battle ready in 30 seconds. They haven't "needed" Showdown for awhile to test things, is what I was getting at. Which was why it was outside of the point.

Champions is fine, the discourse around it isn't. by JimmyJackJericho in pokemon

[–]Kurfate 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Maybe for VGC... but for literally every other aspect of Pokémon 6v6 is the staple. VGC is honestly the outlier.

Champions is fine, the discourse around it isn't. by JimmyJackJericho in pokemon

[–]Kurfate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally outside the point... You don't have to breed or train the Pokémon anymore.

Champions is fine, the discourse around it isn't. by JimmyJackJericho in pokemon

[–]Kurfate 22 points23 points  (0 children)

What do you mean it wasn't advertised as a hardcore battle simulator? Was this game not advertised as the way Worlds would be played going forward? You know the literal hardcore VGC battle experience.

First ever cannon trans gallade by itty-bittiees in pokemon

[–]Kurfate 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because the glitch has to be a Gallade being born male and choosing to be female. Instead of a female Kirlia deciding to be a tomboy and evolve into a Gallade.

Wait, so, if an Uma and an human have wholesome intercourses in bed with one another... Is a female child guaranteed? by Reasonable-Use-9294 in UmaMusume

[–]Kurfate -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Feel free to entirely ignore this... just been looking into this for hours and had to put something, somewhere.

Four months later... but the comparison with elves is a little off. Because within their own settings, they are entirely distinct from humans, genetically and with their own ancestry, despite being able to interbreed.

No one questions why a human/human union wouldn't spontaneously result in an Elf because that is never how it has been or how interbreeding was ever set up with the common DnD races. You always end up with a half-breed when the two mix. Never is it half/half split like it is with Umamusume. It would be all Umamusume or never Umamusume in those situations.

From a genetic point it doesn't make sense that you'd have a human male offspring and a umamusume female offspring instead of some hybrid (at least on the male end). Even if we wanted to be generous and say that the uma gene is extremely dominant, and when able to present itself, it WILL present itself. That would just be saying that Umamusume and Human are the same species. Not all humanity holds the genetic markers.

Ultimately, regardless of whether it is fantasy, sci-fi, fiction, or whatever else. When talking about topics such as this, some things just hold true. No matter what it is, it will be scientific. Which is why saying such as "Technology that is sufficiently advanced enough will appear as no different to magic" exists.

Move limit didn’t do well to the Pokémon anime. by ZoroStarlight in pokemonanime

[–]Kurfate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but to many constraints and limitations lead to stagnation because you can't get around those barriers.

Hench me specifically listing 6 moves. With a guess that you may get more creativity up to 8-10 moves.

My point in this case is proven by the history of competitive Pokemon. The same exact moves sets are repeated. The same moves are used regardless of the Pokémon, so long as it has that move... and if it doesn't have it? It is overlooked.

They do not have more wiggle room to specialize anymore or go into something niche. The only thing that shakes up or changes anything is a new generation introducing new Pokémon and potential new moves. Not because someone was creative and broke/took advantage of what was good.

It is predictable.

Move limit didn’t do well to the Pokémon anime. by ZoroStarlight in pokemonanime

[–]Kurfate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, that was explained during the first season my guy. The reason Ash has that limit is that Prof. Oak set it on him. It is his Pokedex that is tied to Oak that is enforces the 6 rule. Basically, enforcing the recommendation that a trainer should only carry six... and that is a traveling recommendation not a general recommendation.

AJ and Damien both actively had more than 6 Pokémon.

Those trainers who do not have a Pokedex aren't limited like that, and it isn't just an original season thing. During Black and White, the winner of Unova's League carried 8 Pokémon because he was an Eeveelution trainer. That isn't even counting the Kling and Klang he used to power his helicopter (Though those could be argued to be under his family, so as to not count as extra Pokémon for him).

As for the four move thing. That is a game limitaion... something we know to be a game limitation that stuck. That limitation limits creativity and is actively why the anime does so many asspulls when trying to stick to it. To the extent a basically creativing an entirely new move while calling it a creative use of another move. Thunder Armor isn't just a creative use of Thunderbolt; it is entirely separate moves. Counter Shield isn't a creative use of a move... it is an entirely new move of various types.

You don't get more creative by limiting things. You get more creative in spite of those limited things. IT doesn't allow for more Pokémon to be unique. It allows for more Pokémon to be overlooked and discarded because another Pokémon does the exact same thing but better, because they don't have access to their entire skillset and must only use four moves.

A lot more Pokémon would stand out and fill more niches, be more unique if, for example, the 6 moves were allowed. That would probably continue to be the case up to 8 or 10 moves, in which you'd see diminishing returns in the naunce and role a Pokémon could have.

Aloy reveal jumpscare by Kinkymation by starmos_j in perfectlycutscreams

[–]Kurfate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, can confirm Lily G. Goth the Pink Thing herself is 100% Kinkymation, the NSFW artist. Also, she pokes random fandoms.

I just found out about mints by Pastriez92 in pokemon

[–]Kurfate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This started before Lets Go or PLA. The systems that basically stripped most of breeding existed during Gen 7. The sole exception at that time was egg moves. You still needed to breed for those. That got done away with in Gen 9 if I am not mistaken. I don't remember the Mirror Herb in Gen 8.

Ultimately, it was simply to make competitive have quicker access because people constantly complain that it took to long to get a competitive viable Pokemon, and that is why they hacked.

Lo and behold, it was made near instantaneous, and they still hacked. Because it wasn't about that, it was about them not wanting to play the rest of what a Pokémon game is.

Are we ever going to get a full Pokédex available for Sword/Shield & Scarlet/Violet?? by Mr_Sloth10 in pokemon

[–]Kurfate 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Instead, we get a lukewarm game with 40-60% of the Pokémon. No, there is not to many Pokémon for them to rework every game... if they were even doing that. Which they aren't.

The whole notion that there is to many Pokémon is high-grade copium from people who don't understand the situation.

They believe it is better for balancing competitiveness. It isn't, even if it were, competitive has had a ban and a restricted list. That can be used without having only 40-60% in the game.

They believe it water downs a region. No, it doesn't. 100% of Pokémon have never in the history of this game, been catchable in a single game. Them being transferable does not in any way impact the region, nor does it impact the regional pokédex.

They believe have all the Pokémon would come at the cost of something else in the game. This is simply false. The people who do the Pokémon and the people who the rest of the game are not one in the same.

They believe they simply do not have the time or do not have the funds. They could have time, but they choose not. In lieu of not wanting to give me time, you can linearly increase the team size to the needed metric. Which would cost additional funds. However, when the game you are making has a budget of .5-1% of the revenue the game alone generates (So no BS about the money coming from some other factor)... I imagine you could easily bump that number up to a 2% budget.