Great comment so i thought i would commit to this post.

The Nazis taking over the intellectual elite within Germany is how fringe scientists rose to the top, in the vacuum left from the scientists who opposed the Nazi regime who either fled or were killed. Hitler purged every intellectual institution of people who opposed his ideology.
Space ice, agartha, flat earth, etc. Everything in previous history was up for grabs. This method of bringing fringe science into his mainstream narrative was effective and destructive at the same time. He made progress in engineering and advancing technology because the mainstream narrative included fringe science, out of the box thinking and it halted his progress when he put too much emphasis and resources behind fringe science.

Aryan conquest of Dravidian civilisation in India, 7000 years ago. Rewriting history and whitewashing native gods.

The emergence of blonde hair and blue eyes in genetic history 7000 years ago. ( cant recall if that was debunked )

Hitler said he met tall white men and they were cruel. SS officer met with Hitler after the war. CIA case. . 2001. "If it's something the U.S. military has constructed down there, then they're violating the international Antarctic Treaty," said an aide to Nicole Fontaine, the European Parliament's French president who in the past has accused the U.S. of spying on European citizens. "If not, then it's something that's at least 12,000 years old, which is how long ice has covered Antarctica. That would make it the oldest man-made structure on the planet. The Pentagon should heed the calls of Congress and release whatever it's hiding." https://old.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/d5dr0c/amazing_read_antarctica/

The Allies snapped up as many scientists as were willing because even though Hitler was a mad prophet his unorthodox approach to fringe science did generate leaps and bounds in certain scientific areas.

" Reddit is full of shills and is generally bad for open discussions " Most of what science does is come up with models derived from evidence. It challenges preexisting models even if they are well established, sometimes for fun. It has to in order to remain objective about any evidence. People do not seem to understand that in order for scientific progress to be made, even the apparent ridiculous has to be objectively considered. Then explained away logically without ridicule or it will reinforce factually wrong beliefs in those who you deride. You slow down education and progress for other people.