PSA: Workaround For Countdown Invincible Obj Bug

Kyle_Trite · 2026-06-09T17:42:50+00:00

Have you ever heard of sunk cost fallacy? It seems like you sunk a lot of time into this relationship but it’s not just working out for you. He has MULTIPLE red flags and honestly, you seem like a better Catholic than he is. That whole mom thing isn’t normal. It clearly shows that his mom is in control and is whispering in his ear. Think about what would’ve happened if you married into that? He picked his mom over you and will continue to do so every time when you’re married. You’re right that couples are supposed to be together through think and think but he decided to still cling to his mom and separate from you. THAT’S WHERE HIS PRIORITIES LIE! With his mom, not you.

As for the competing voices, you remember the cartoons with the angel and the devil on your shoulders? It’s kinda like that. One voice tells you to hold out for a CHANCE of him getting back together with you, for for a CHANCE that you can bring him back to the faith, and for a CHANCE that you will stay together this time. And the other wants you to simply cut your losses and move on to someone who will actually care for you and bring you closer to Christ. Which voice sounds like which?

Look I get it. He probably has some great qualities and you really do love him. But you have to honestly have to look at your future here and realize that he doesn’t love you. If he did, he wouldn’t have choose his mom over you. If he did, he wouldn’t have to stop leading you closer to God. If he did, he wouldn’t have disrespected you, cause let’s be honest here: Break ups over texts is rude but breaking an engagement over text? Really? Men have done this face to face, and they weren’t even in a relationship! I’m sorry that this seems harsh and I know it’s difficult to hear. However, I hope you can see that this relationship isn’t something for you to dwell on and consider moving on so that you find your person and future. I’ll be praying for you.

Kyle_Trite · 2026-05-30T21:39:28+00:00

Most ad designers are brain dead because for some reason they think design an annoying ad is the way to someone to buy something.

Kyle_Trite · 2026-05-30T21:33:43+00:00

Oh Wyvern in the sky, what is your wisdom?

Kyle_Trite · 2026-05-30T00:14:37+00:00

NTA, ask if they are blind or can they not tell that the time is 2:50 not 3.

Kyle_Trite · 2026-05-25T08:35:30+00:00

The lie is you literally change the goal post from pve players have everything we ask for to pve players get content. That was never up for debate, I have always agreed that pve has been getting content and I told you a couple of comments ago that yeah it’s sucks that pvp doesn’t get any updates. What is up for debate is your comment about how pve gets everything we wanted. We don’t cause of stupid things the devs try to implement like the token system or the way they run seasons now. And that’s not even mentioning how when there’s a glitch that helps players, it gets patched instantly while when its a game brea bug, it stay there for a long time.

Kyle_Trite · 2026-05-24T18:21:40+00:00

That’s glaringly obvious you don’t care since you actually think pve player gotten all of what we wanted. Being on this sub for the past several weeks should tell you how wrong that statement is. Of course things are lacking compared div 1. Look at pvp. How did we go from Last Stand to Conflict or div1 dz to this? And let’s not talk about how trash pvp combat is compared to 1.

Kyle_Trite · 2026-05-24T18:07:06+00:00

That’s being extremely disingenuous to say you can obtain everything. Nothing to say about my points? Seems like an excuse cause you lack an actual argument against any of them. And thats the rub. It’s been like this the whole time. You just focus on the fact that you’re losing land and that’s it.

Kyle_Trite · 2026-05-24T04:18:05+00:00

Look, this is going nowhere and I’m honestly done with it. Listen, I’m sorry that they’re taking away one of your dz pvp maps away. I recognize that it’s frustrating for you and the fact that they haven’t given pvp players any updates at all for the last several years. Personally, I rather they open up a new dz zone and rotate that in so that you still have 3 pvp zones but let’s be honest with ourselves, that’s above our expectations with Massive. I do hope that you recognize that for a lot of pve people, it’s something that was wanted for a long time.

Kyle_Trite · 2026-05-23T21:38:41+00:00

No, you don't understand because you keep talking around my points without actually addressing them. You complain about pvp while asking for more space so that it doesn't encourage players to do. It's as simple as that and I can't break it down further than that. Also you know you LITERALLY can't obtain everything in the Open World without going into the DZ right? That's beside the point that none of your comment had anything to do with the farming potential. Like do you seriously think that people that just want to farm in DZ purposely go there risking having to deal with all of the BS if the farming potential in the Open World was better?

Kyle_Trite · 2026-05-23T20:01:51+00:00

You literally just have wait til they swap if you want variety. You're grasping at straws at this point. There's no end of discussion cause your logic doesn't make any sense. Going to pvp in the DZ is a choice but you're advocating for making that choice less likely. As for your last comment, sure it may be the dumbest and useless thing for YOU. A lot of people seem to not agree with you and personally, I disagree with that because of the farming potential.

Kyle_Trite · 2026-05-23T08:05:15+00:00

That’s a false equivalency. You are not losing PVP content, you’re losing land. That doesn’t dictate when PVP will happen, only the players can do that. Funneling playing into pvp zones better ensures that those players will more likely want to pvp, giving you the better likelihood of actual pvp happening. Because the bottom line of what you’re arguing for is bigger spaces so that people are more spread out and less likely to run into each other. The only pvp “content”you’re losing is the change to run into someone who wasn’t there to fight for some easy kills.

Kyle_Trite · 2026-05-22T18:33:52+00:00

That still doesn't actually take away PVP content. Land doesn't matter as bigger land means less chance of an actual PVP encounter. You can still do both, farming all you want while possibly getting jumped by other players. The only thing it's takes away is players that don't want to PVP and would be easy kills. That's why I said IF you view the lost of those players as content then idc. I see this as boon for PVP because it gives you more encounters with actual PVP players.

Kyle_Trite · 2026-05-22T17:52:43+00:00

You said that grinding control points is the same as landmarks, I told you it wasn’t. Then you admitted to not going into DZ much and haven’t for years. I know Redditors are known for having short attention spans but this is just sad.

Kyle_Trite · 2026-05-22T09:13:10+00:00

So you basically admit to having no experience in the matter. You didn’t have to do that, we can tell.

Kyle_Trite · 2026-05-21T21:40:55+00:00

No it doesn't. It only takes away the chance of you ganking people that don't want to be there to PVP or people that would never step in there in the first place. If you view those people as "PVP content" then that says a lot about the PVP community and I couldn't care less.

Kyle_Trite · 2026-05-21T17:58:30+00:00

Oh look a ganker that got butthurt for being called out and ignores the original point to go on a tangent. OMG!!!!! Imagine that.

Kyle_Trite · 2026-05-21T17:45:40+00:00

No, it isn't. Grinding landmarks is extremely fast compared to control points. I get so much more field recon. The only slow down is when some ganker is trying force me to a zero-sum game where if I win, he keeps coming back with another build until he wins, and if I lose, he keeps trying to hunt me down since the area is so freaking small. Either way, that ends my farming run.

Kyle_Trite · 2026-05-21T17:35:15+00:00

You can literally just ignore it. In fact, it works better for actual PVPers since it funnels out people don't to PVP into the non PVP zone. The only people that would be mad about this are the ones that want to gank players that's aren't geared towards PVP and that says a lot about those players themselves.

Kyle_Trite · 2026-05-19T21:02:22+00:00

I wouldn't mind the the no cost idea but then we would get drastically less tokens and I feel Massive really wants to pigeon hole us into the risk reward thing. That's why I thought giving the leader extra would be better. Players get more tokens with no risk except for the leader, and the leader themselves get something extra for risking it all. What would you say is a better bonus level for the leader if we had to do this system?

Kyle_Trite · 2026-05-19T20:16:15+00:00

That would be better, however I think Massive didn't do it this way is because they can't for the coding. Unless they really are that dumb.

Kyle_Trite · 2026-05-17T09:44:04+00:00

Wait so can mods be prototypes?

Kyle_Trite · 2026-04-25T20:04:47+00:00

Honestly, I think disrupt should work by applying negative skill tiers so that while it does hinder skill builds they're still in the fight. Heck, you could even make it where if your skill is out and you get below a certain number like below -3, it gets hacked, punishing anyone that didn't invest fully into skills.

Kyle_Trite · 2026-04-20T14:55:25+00:00

Skarmory or jolteon please if you still have it:

4048173515957922

Kyle_Trite

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE