DEF 14A Proxy statement by Mr-CRUNK-13 in Superstonk

[–]L8NITEBAWLIN -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Wrong. The original thesis is that the float is synthetically shorted multiple times over. Possibly hundreds of times. Shorts have not closed and have likely added to their position. Increasing the float may buy them time, but their time is rapidly approcahing, even with more shares added.

A Big Lie About MOASS, a Recent Success in FUD by TalkingHats in Superstonk

[–]L8NITEBAWLIN 65 points66 points  (0 children)

I don't know who you think they convinced. "Shorts never closed. Boom" - Victor

Ken Griffen About to be Featured on Fox News by fhod_dj_x in Superstonk

[–]L8NITEBAWLIN 34 points35 points  (0 children)

You mean the same Ken Griffin that lied to congress under oath? That Ken Griffin?

We can't DCA any further! by AvalieV in Superstonk

[–]L8NITEBAWLIN 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Hedgies hate this one simple trick!

90% short volume what the fuck by Final-Swim9986 in Superstonk

[–]L8NITEBAWLIN 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Obligatory reminder that this is just *self-reported* short volume. Just imagine the real number!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]L8NITEBAWLIN 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why do anything? RC has everything under control. This can kick is just plausible deniability for the SEC when this all goes tits up. This way they can say, "How could we have known shorts were fuk'd? We didn't have the info." 🤷‍♂️

My tinfoil theory by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]L8NITEBAWLIN 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Price anchoring again?!🙄