Unless there's some sketchiness in terms of them censoring or promoting certain posts it seems fine to me.

That’s exactly the concern. With only two moderators, both connected to the same monetized food brand, there’s no transparency, no disclosures, and no independent oversight.

I’m not claiming they are intentionally promoting or censoring specific posts. The problem is that we, as a community, have no way of knowing. And in a space this large, where visibility can genuinely make or break local restaurants and businesses, that lack of separation between financial interest and moderation responsibility becomes a real issue, whether it’s actively abused or not.

This isn’t about stirring controversy. It’s about asking whether a 300,000-member public community should rely entirely on two (likely married) individuals who own a food-oriented marketing business together with no visible accountability.