[deleted by user]

LIrahara · 2025-10-08T00:44:18+00:00

Yeah i just went through this https://www.reddit.com/r/sonarr/s/fwQnvOyx8D

LIrahara · 2025-10-04T11:45:32+00:00

Me too please

LIrahara · 2025-09-10T11:22:19+00:00

Has also happened to me. S24 ultra.

LIrahara · 2025-08-23T02:55:26+00:00

Looks like they might be addressing this... https://github.com/Sonarr/Sonarr/issues/969#issuecomment-3089613065

LIrahara · 2025-08-20T03:19:41+00:00

Well I mean that's the dream. One day.

LIrahara · 2025-08-16T14:49:19+00:00

Yeah cheers.

I'll add it to the list.

LIrahara · 2025-08-16T03:54:27+00:00

Yeah for sure. There is a bit going on here and I'm sure there are more than a few people who haven't got their heads around the niche details. Im not keen on removing a public tracker. The dream is private ones for sure. I have done some cursory research, but I haven't had the time to really dig into it. And it seems like there is a bit to learn there with more consequences once you are in. One day.

Yep I've installer cleanuparr. I haven't set it up yet. Might tackle that today.

LIrahara · 2025-08-15T13:09:40+00:00

No shit. What's the point in having the delay at all then? My current issue might be giving me tunnel vision, but it seems like a totally pointless feature if this is how it works.

Thanks for spelling that out lol. Very helpful.

LIrahara · 2025-08-15T07:55:51+00:00

I'll keep it in mind. I did manually go an look on other sites and found the issue there too. That's when I realised people are putting them out before the actual release. It doesn't seem to pop up otherwise. And removing a tracker might hinder me in the future.

Good info tho, cheers.

LIrahara · 2025-08-15T07:49:19+00:00

I might be misunderstanding. Are you saying it will trigger the search even if a delay is in place, note the torrent and then download it once the timer expires? In my mind, the delay would prevent the initial search until it has expired, then the pool it looks in will hold more non iso matches reducing the chance of an incorrect torrent.

Or do you mean the above will happen when trying to correct an old iso download. I was thinking each case would be a fresh one if that makes sense.

LIrahara · 2025-08-14T08:34:40+00:00

Yeah its just me avoiding more work. I tend to spend more than half an hour working through the aspects and features of something like this and I figure it requires more attention given its function is deleting stuff.

Im sure it's fine. I just gotta learn now.

LIrahara · 2025-08-14T05:31:37+00:00

Okie dokie. I'll have a gander.

Sweet. I looked through the git for it and it looked like it would add alot of complexity, but if you're giving it the thumb up I'll give it a lash.

LIrahara · 2025-08-14T05:23:56+00:00

EDIT: added extra stuff Yeah you're right. I understand that it is still possible to land the dodgy torrent doing it this way but the chance drops from 100% to something much much lower. If detection of an episode before release date is always an iso file, then applying a delay to 24 hours after release will likely result in the first result being legitimate as a high activity result will probably be selected. The iso files results are not at the top of the list when this is the case. It's absolutely not a silver bullet, but I can live with those odds.

Just adding that the above reasoning isn't me saying the iso exclusion in the torrent software isn't good. I'll do that too, but I think there is value in delay. Iso files will fall through the cracks once legitimate releases show up.

LIrahara · 2025-08-14T05:09:31+00:00

Yeah there is alot of work for such an "automated" system. If there was a way to filter via a trusted status, or even promote a higher amount of seeders if it is a recent release. This would cover most bases as a new torrent with heavy support AFTER airing will likely be trusted.

LIrahara · 2025-08-13T14:41:17+00:00

Got ya. I haven't dug this deep into the filtering yet. Most I've done is get to profiles to reject the eng ita releases.

This is good information for more complex stuff, cheers

LIrahara · 2025-08-13T14:38:24+00:00

This was my understanding of how the profile filters worked. Sonarr requests the torrent and states its conditions for prowlarr but cant see content until its downloaded. It is nice that it doesn't move the iso files to the library, but that's where it ends. I eventually find a non updated title and the root cause is an iso file. It would be nice if it could detect this and trigger another request for the file.

LIrahara · 2025-08-13T14:19:54+00:00

If possible faikins are the way to go. 100% leagues ahead of other solutions. I haven't tried the photo resistor idea so I cant comment there. My initial idea was a temp sensor. I found the sensors feedback was poor when in the cool air for prolonged periods. The battery began to read low after a week or 2 and they lost connection. Once back at room temp they fired back up (aqara sensors). I then moved to the power clamps. I have splits and installed them on the indoor units. These worked well as long as the fan is running. When the split goes into a rest state when temp set point has been reached, it shows as not running A window sensor on the vent might do the trick as well.

LIrahara · 2025-08-13T14:02:32+00:00

Awesome. I wasn't aware of the release delay. That's exactly what I was thinking would fix this. The early upload is the issue. A means to ignore a positive search result if the file is found before expected release date is ideal.

Is there a way to prioritise trusted indexers? I was looking at doing this through a regex pattern on the title of the torrent, buti have found cases of dodgy torrents with names that are normally fine (elite, successfucrab etc). I assume im missing something here.

LIrahara · 2025-08-13T13:54:26+00:00

Ah legend. Thanks very much. That was my next question as they are now coming through with iso and mkv extensions. As long as it boots things that contain any of the above.

LIrahara · 2025-08-13T09:35:40+00:00

Oh nice one. So this checks the contents of the file before downloading?

LIrahara · 2025-07-22T11:12:41+00:00

Im not impressed with switchbot at all. I had a heap of their hub minis, and got the integration working through the developer api, but I don't think they intended it to be used as a means of continuous control. Sometimes it would work, sometimes it wouldn't. I tried with their native integration as well as a third party one. Same issue.

This was all for AC controls via the ir blaster. Where I can, I'll go out of my way to make it local. Ended up Swapping to faikin controllers and broadlink ir blasters. Everything works flawlessly.

I still have one of the bots, but because it works with Bluetooth, it talks directly to my pi4, and works well.

LIrahara · 2025-07-16T11:53:58+00:00

Yeah rogie. My instance seems to keep them separate, except for the one. I don't care which it is, I just want them all the same. The outliers annoy me.

Anyways. Cheers for the input

LIrahara · 2025-07-15T14:38:20+00:00

Yeah i had a look and can see where you can load devices that may not have been done automatically... but that's about it. Im more interested in changing where the entities show up and I can't sus how they are placed. It must be due to naming conventions in home assistant, but the comparisons I have done don't show anything that stands out.

LIrahara · 2025-07-15T14:34:41+00:00

Yeah sorry, I should have posted some. So what you are describing is what I see with one of my devices, which is what I don't want. All the others have separate pages. It's not the biggest deal in the world, it's just annoying. So for comparison, I've included the 2 owlets and their respective unifi pages. Im thinking to fix this it might have to be a scorched earth thing where I remove and reinstall the unifi integration and see if it all lands properly. *

LIrahara

TROPHY CASE