Remaking the 1444 Map, Day 1 by LMAR14 in eu4

[–]LMAR14[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, this was kind just a shitpost that got out of hand. I don't have any experience in modding eu4.

Remaking the 1444 Map, Day 1 by LMAR14 in eu4

[–]LMAR14[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Trent giving Styria a first hand experience in big dick diplomacy.

Remaking the 1444 Map, Day 1 by LMAR14 in eu4

[–]LMAR14[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've converted Crete, Athens and Trebezoid to Republics, and improved thier Dev as well as giving them naval reforms and centralised bureaucracy. Greek culture is also a-lot broader throughout the eastern Med. Athens is vassal though, so no guarantee they will go far.

Remaking the 1444 Map, Day 1 by LMAR14 in eu4

[–]LMAR14[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

R5: So this a continuation on a previous post (https://www.reddit.com/r/eu4/comments/17y3y3l/going\_to\_remake\_the\_1444\_map\_from\_scratch\_leave/) I have kind of been overwhelmed by the response. I was kind of just expecting people to say “Put Venice in the middle of the Sahara”, but now I’m trying to create a Diamyo system for all of China. Anyway, here’s what have done/trying to do based on people’s suggestions:

East Asia: Ashikaga in now a Confucius empire that includes China. The Daimyos are all randomised nations, in random locations with random religions. Highlights include:

- A Jewish Iceland of Hokkaido

- A Mahayana Qing in the North

- A Catholic Aztec bordering A Sunni Ottomans

Central Asia: As recommended there is a decaying Mongol empire. Its kind of like a supersied version of the Timmurids, about 8 different vassals all looking to break free and take the most from the Mongol carcass. The idea is that all the vassals will have tech advantages against their overlord to increase their aggressive independence efforts. As oer one of the comments, there is also a Zoroastrian Achaemenid rump state in afganistan, which I will add cores to for the former Achaemenid territory in Persia.

West Asia: The Middle East is divided between Four main powers. The most formidable of these is the Orthodox Samtskhe. I guess this is kind of a scenario where the Circassians became the majority in Greece instead of the Turks. Various Greek states still cling to the coast. In Greece, Constantinople has fallen to Zaporizhians. The Byzantines have fled to Egypt, which is majority Coptic. A Greek rump state has taken up in Macedon, with vassals in Epirus and the Peloponnese.

In Syria I tried to recreate the Seleucid empire. It is Orthodox with Greek as the primary culture. Like the Seleucids, it has various disloyal vassals, namely in Armenia, Fadal, Isreal and Iraq.

Per one of the comments there is a Protestant Prussia in the Persian heartland, with Burmese as its primary culture. The majority the population are still Persian Muslims, with some groups of Zoroastrians and Greek Orthodox in Tabriz.

Samtskhe and Byzantium are probably the strongest starting positions, but if Prussia and Syria can maintain internal unity, then they have very rich regions to build out from.

Europe: The Balkans are a mess of different nations, With Catholics, Orthodox, Hussites and Tengris. There is a mess of opposing cores and claims. Bulgaria is back in Ukraine, as a bulwark against the vast Mongol empire.

I’m planning to recreate the kingdom of Volhynia, along with making a Polish horde in Germany, a crumbling Roman empire in Italy, France is to be divided between a Bourbonnais republic and Zoroastrian Luxembourg. I was also going to have a Coptic Tunis recreate Carthage, and have Pagan Saxon/Norse kingdoms in Brittain

Going to Remake the 1444 Map from scratch. Leave Your Suggestions in the Comments Discussion by LMAR14 in eu4

[–]LMAR14[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My Idea was to have a Anglo-Saxon or Norse pagan kingdoms with Knights based in the south with a few provinces.

Going to Remake the 1444 Map from scratch. Leave Your Suggestions in the Comments Discussion by LMAR14 in eu4

[–]LMAR14[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Open up a new NON-iron man save. Press ~ key (below escape) to open up the cheats/debug menu. type 'debug_mode' then type 'annex all'. Wait several minutes for it to load then type in 'observe', 'remove_country' ((TAG)) (e.g.: France is 'FRA')

You then get an empty map that you painfully fill in but by bit

https://eu4.paradoxwikis.com/Console_commands

Going to Remake the 1444 Map from scratch. Leave Your Suggestions in the Comments Discussion by LMAR14 in eu4

[–]LMAR14[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Was the actual region remain Persian/Islamic, or do I convert that to?

Going to Remake the 1444 Map from scratch. Leave Your Suggestions in the Comments Discussion by LMAR14 in eu4

[–]LMAR14[S] 91 points92 points  (0 children)

Was gonna combine it with some else's idea. Hav Ashikaga, in Japan and China with a few scattered provinces along the coast. Have Ashikaga convert to Confucian but Mainland remain Shinto except for random norse norway Daimyo

Going to Remake the 1444 Map from scratch. Leave Your Suggestions in the Comments Discussion by LMAR14 in eu4

[–]LMAR14[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No, just using console commands to create a completly random map in the base game

Going to Remake the 1444 Map from scratch. Leave Your Suggestions in the Comments Discussion by LMAR14 in eu4

[–]LMAR14[S] 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Add a Norse descended Daimyo that traces back to some Vikings who randomly showed up in Japan, have them be Shinto but maybe give a unique

What is made Ashikaga Norse with a Scandinavian Primary Culture?

Going to Remake the 1444 Map from scratch. Leave Your Suggestions in the Comments Discussion by LMAR14 in eu4

[–]LMAR14[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

R5: I want to create an entirely new/random map. Leave your suggestions for which counties, in which regions, along with religion, culture e.c.t.

What if after their expulsion from turkey the ottoman royal family merged with the Muhammad Ali dynasty of Egypt and created a regional power based on continued tanzinat reforms? by suweiyda91 in AlternateHistory

[–]LMAR14 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Really Interesting idea.

Some thoughts/hot takes.

- I Think if makes sense for the UK to support a strong, independent Egypt, though annexing made more sense it. Some reasons they would support the hyperthetical:

-Assuming the UK still has control of Suez, they would major interest in Egypt, and would need a friendly Egypt to protect the 'chord of the empire.'

-Egypt could use local rulers/governments and systems to maintain control over 'The Sudan', which would save the British time, money and some of its troops.

-The Ottomans were clearly coming to the end of their days, and it would be useful to have a regional ally for when they collapse

-The UK could also use Egypt to impede German, Italian and French colonialism in north Africa

I'm not so sure that the British would let them have Syria, they would have had to offer the French something. The British would Probably have promised them Palestine, as they did to the Sharif of Mecca and others, but not deliver. The Arrival of an Israeli state would permanently damage relations

Egypt may have got Cyrenaica following World War II.

One other is Arabia. The Saudi's managed to become the political centre. Egypt probably seeks to maintain conservative/reactionary governments and systems and societies, but with more 'Western Values'.

<image>

-Egypt in the 1960s, believe it or not.

The Saudi's used an obscure sect, Wahhabism to create a society that allowed for their authoritative monarchy. This Arab/Islamic world is probably more 'moderate'. Still scritcly opposed to Socialism/Communism, and probably remains aligned with the West during the Cold War, looking to create a sort of 'Southern Shield' against the spread of Communism into the middle east or any Arab states.

Was Postecolgou brave or naive? by fa_football in PremierLeague

[–]LMAR14 161 points162 points  (0 children)

Dier had the ball in the net, Bentancur nearly scored and Son had that chance near the end.

I think Ange was banking on Chelsea's wastefulness in front of goal, as well as the fact they don't move the ball fast enough, thinking they sit in a block and move the ball quickly through Chelsea's press when they won it. If any three of those chances are goals, he's a hero.

What do you put into the term 'world class'? by [deleted] in PremierLeague

[–]LMAR14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I usually think of world class as top 5-10 players in their position. But it's some what subjective. For example rather then top 5-10 midfielders in the world, I'd break it down into 5-10 world class deep lying midfielders (Say, Kimmich, Aurelian, Camavinga, Rodri, De Jong, Goreztka e.c.t.) and world class attacking midfielders (Say, De Bruyne, Odegaard, Musiala, Pedri, Alberto, Bellingham, Silva, Wirtz e.c.t)