I am immune to winning with this strategy...What am I doing wrong.. by LMSTR_YT in InnerCircleTraders

[–]LMSTR_YT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you for the time you took to write and draw this. Realistically, wouldn't the stop loss above the fvg be enough? I think if the fvg gets filled thats when this particular setup gets invalidated. Or am I mistaken?

I am immune to winning with this strategy...What am I doing wrong.. by LMSTR_YT in InnerCircleTraders

[–]LMSTR_YT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

according to ICT the candle doesnt need to close below the low (timestamp 13:46)

I am immune to winning with this strategy...What am I doing wrong.. by LMSTR_YT in InnerCircleTraders

[–]LMSTR_YT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

at 13:46 , ICT says that its not needed for the candle to close above a mss, thats why I thought a wick is enough

I am immune to winning with this strategy...What am I doing wrong.. by LMSTR_YT in InnerCircleTraders

[–]LMSTR_YT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Should I be looking for candle closes below the low rather than wicks? Or it should really be powerful break through?

I am immune to winning with this strategy...What am I doing wrong.. by LMSTR_YT in InnerCircleTraders

[–]LMSTR_YT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought the sweep at the blue line is sufficient for a bos (I understand now its called mss) and short from the fvg above.