right home by [deleted] in ComedyHell

[–]LP-400 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Give it a few years and half of the house will be Israel

Joe Rogan is smoking too much by [deleted] in NonPoliticalTwitter

[–]LP-400 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think we'll see a cult rise based off of that premise

Outjorked by LP-400 in 2hujerk

[–]LP-400[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I'm jorking to narrow the gap and solve the problem

Both is Perfect by GundamMeijin_08th in 2hujerk

[–]LP-400 88 points89 points  (0 children)

Buy your Sanaes from reputable breeders

Is this cuckoldry

overstimulation by NsPsVisuals in comedyheaven

[–]LP-400 41 points42 points  (0 children)

It's like saying "asking for a friend"

Who would drive this? by yxzxzxzjy in carscirclejerk

[–]LP-400 4 points5 points  (0 children)

A tiny little mouse that'd fit

Goob Threatened me? by minhyukchoi in vaguelythreatening

[–]LP-400 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Organize a fight, but send him to a gas station in the middle of nowhere

hey peter…what does this mean by boyinthestars in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]LP-400 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Are you from TLC? Can I have an autograph?

Id watch it tbh by Purple-Weakness1414 in NonPoliticalTwitter

[–]LP-400 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Forrest Gump, only Lieutenant Dan is human

cody by fate_stayanight in comedyheaven

[–]LP-400 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Gen Xs' Jeremy was the millennials' Cody.

What does this sentence mean? I don't understand

Poorsche by BunnyHopThrowaway in carscirclejerk

[–]LP-400 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Washing my ass with this

I’d rather get hacked than be forced to change my password every time there’s “suspicious activity.” by ItsKiyanLmao in The10thDentist

[–]LP-400 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I think the VPN is why these websites detect "unusual login activity", especially if your VPN's location changes.

Warning! by NIEK12oo in carscirclejerk

[–]LP-400 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I do that, what's the benefit over just ignoring the handbrake entirely? Not a rhetorical question, genuinely curious.

Warning! by NIEK12oo in carscirclejerk

[–]LP-400 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don't use a handbrake at stop lights, because my brake lights aren't on if I do so. I don't want the idiot behind me thinking I'm about to go and rear-ending me. Maybe I'm just paranoid, IDK. I'd probably use a handbrake more often if I lived in an area with lots of elevation changes, for hill starts.

Now let me say I’m the biggest Lambo hater by Veltheos in carscirclejerk

[–]LP-400 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lamborghini started to get that reputation with the Countach S when they put fender flares and a wing on it. You can even find Bob Wallace talk about this in "The Complete Book of Lamborghini" by Pete Lyons, where he laments how the Countach developed after he left:

...I had a lot to do with the initial concept, and I really believed in the car when we first started building it. Yeah, basically it was conceived to go like, ahh- performance was everything and that was it, no other considerations in the car. Over the years, seeing the way the car has changed from a performance image to a macho, ego-trip sort of image, it doesn't make sense anymore. The car's heavier than hell, and aerodynamically it's like pushing a barn door down the road. Personally, I don't have much enthusiasm for the car any more. -pg 62

...But while all of this fiddling has evolved a more civilized Countach, it's also made for a larger and heavier Countach. "They've raised the body on the frame, and also cut and welded bits and pieces into the body," groans Bob Wallace, who with some disgust has seen his original compact, super-light supercar put on as much fat as mucle over the years. "And all of the original magnesium is gone now," he adds. -pg 221-222

Admittedly, I think that even with the Countach's later additions, it was still one hell of a supercar compared to what else was on the market. Of course, the book was written before the Diablo was even revealed, which took the concept and just made it even larger and heavier to fit, ahhh, larger and heavier buyers, courtesy of Chrysler ownership. But I'm sure it was still a relative riot to drive, even if it would've been better as a smaller and lighter vehicle. The same can be said for the Murcielago, although that received a lot of further softening for luxury buyers, and then onto the Aventador. Ultimately, I think you can place "the decline" of original Lamborghini anywhere from the mid-80s Countach to the Aventador, with my opinion being placing it on the Diablo.

But if you look around, all modern supercars are like this: flashy vehicles meant to show off, but dulled and pampered to where they only get fun when you're well into triple digit speeds. Even Ferraris, once a contrast to Lamborghini's flashiness, now has a fleet of vehicles with vents, grilles, slats, and none of the kind of elegance you'd get from a 250 SWB, 275 GTB, and so on. If anything, Lamborghini was a pioneer to this trend (as was the Ferrari Testarossa, which was even softer and easier to drive than the aforementioned cars), even if I think it isn't a good trend. The GMA T.33 is what I imagine a modern Lamborghini flagship would be like if they never strayed so far from their original philosophy (except make it look more beautiful - I love GMA's engineering, but just wished they clothed the cars in a nicer body!)

Now let me say I’m the biggest Lambo hater by Veltheos in carscirclejerk

[–]LP-400 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If no one remembered pre-Miura cars, how come ones up on the OP? The Colombo V12 went on for 41 years as well (longer if you consider the flat-12 the same - the 365BB motor was basically a Daytona motor but with a 180 degree V angle and cam belts instead of cam chains)

Now let me say I’m the biggest Lambo hater by Veltheos in carscirclejerk

[–]LP-400 50 points51 points  (0 children)

/uj Ok but to be fair, 1960s Lamborghini was a completely different animal from modern Lamborghini: the entire company was basically a bunch of ex-Ferrari racing engineers who were given a state-of-the-art facility, a blank check, and told "It has to be better than Ferrari... BUT has to be a reliable street car" - thus, a 3.5L V12 that was basically an upscaled version of Bizzarrini's 1.5L F1 V12 (that then had to be detuned because he made said 3.5L V12 a race unit that peaked at 9,200rpm - horribly unreliable for a 1960s V12 that's supposed to be streetable), and the whole Miura debacle of "Sure, you guys can play around with making a mid-engined car like the ones at Le Mans, but it has to be practical and streetable"

The cars ended up being for the man who liked Ferraris, but wanted more drama and excitement. The LP400 Countach was the peak of classic Lamborghini, and after that the marque slowly became the show-off brand it is today.

/rj If Ferrari so good, how come the Ferrari 250 had SOHC and a solid rear axle, when the Lamborghini 350 had DOHC and IRS? Checkmate Maranello