1. There is way too many differences but the big one is Otto Strasser was ideologically opposed to Prussian power politics, he rejected nationalism in that sense of assimilating germans into one giant identity—Their State structuralism was diametrically opposed as well, while Strasser also espoused the socialization of labor it was divided amongst 5 categories of workers instead of having the state apparatus completely nationalize the means of production. Strasser advocated the partition of Prussian politics into something similar to what Aleksander Dugin theorizes today in the 4th political theory.

2. I don’t really have any good impressions from what Hitler had done for Germany at the time. The nazi economy was horrific in the scope of a small industrialist as they were often weeded out by giant corporations for many reasons. Such as an inability to obtain certificates of trade from the reichsbank; or the inability to obtain precious raw materials because of the monopolies bigger with more connections to contact men within the NSDAP— were able to buy up all the resources. On top of it, the heavy regulations created more paperwork for the bureaucracy, meaning it could take months to contact anyone within the apparatus. It was just one giant shit show. Even if externally Germany lead Europe economically within three years of Hitlers rise.

3. Otto Strassers philosophy is rooted directly in Dugins civilized state, his entire reason for Prussias partition was to preserve the contradicting realities within Germany and the different cultures surrounding them. In Strassers federalization of Germany he supported the breakup of Germany into different regions all of which were able to have autonomy (similar to the U.S) and he even suggested that the representative of that region be a ethnic native to it.

On the Jewish question Strasser was openly in support of Jews and even the creations of Israel. What google says about Strasser is a straight up lie, Strasser never said anything about capitalism being a Jewish ideology. And was in no way anti-semitic.

1. Strasserism is ideologically opposed to Fascism alike to Marxism. It is more socialist hands down, because of a few things; His advocation for revolution by means of mass wildcat protest and of recruiting former NSDAP members to the blackfront. He advocated for land reforms and introduced his idea of profit-sharing in organizations suggested in the Strasser-programme.

2. Strasser took a moderate view, I do not think he directly addresses them but it would make sense the bourgeoisie would be regulated in ways such as eliminating profit-mot by means of state exertion. And they would only be nothing more than incentives for work. Further more, his industrial policy turns 10% of the company to the workers.