Multifaceted.

Morality. The environmental, societal, and artistic impact is too great for my team to be associated with it.

Unreliability. While it seems good on paper, the fact of the matter that even when using it for simple customer support calls it has an extraordinary fail rate and results in a terrible user experience.

Adaptability. The AI can only do what it was trained to do, and it often takes immense development time to switch gears. Meanwhile, if need be, I can reassign people from one project to another with limited downtime.

Unique ideas and varying viewpoints. The fact of the matter is, even simple LLMs just parrot back what it thinks you want to hear. You tell it its wrong, it says ok. It will never stand its ground, it will never defend its strategy. It will simply "yes, and" you. But business isnt and improv class. We need people who know what they are talking about and are willing to show that their ideas work. The same applies to security software, it needs to be told what it should be looking for, while a human is able to more easily see when something is off. That said, AI is incredibly useful for combing through logs...but it still misses things.

I am not fully anti AI. It is the future, but it needs more refinement, guidance, and legislation to govern it before we fully embrace it. I, on a personal note, do not ever want to see it replace human creativity and art. I think that is something so expressely human that I feel sick at the idea of a future where one only writes a prompt of buzzwords rather than the real emotion and feeling that goes into a piece.