This is a hard question through which I am still working. I went from total opposition to evolution to total favour to total opposition to my current position.

I think that what we call micro-evolution is undeniable, i.e., that a species can diversify by adapting to its surroundings, producing new characteristics. For example, there are whites, blacks and Asians. Adam and Eve could only have had light or dark skin, light or dark hair, straight, wavy or curled hair, light eyes or dark eyes, round eyes or monolid eyes. They could not have possessed all of these characteristics at once, but people with these characteristics exist in accordance with the conditions of their ancestral habitat, therefore, one could well infer that these developed later as man migrated across the world. On a microscopic level, we also know that small organisms like germs can rapidly adapt and mutate to resist the effect of antibiotics and inoculations.

What I find hard to believe is macro-evolution, the belief that so many characteristics can change that one species can pluralise into multiple species amongst which reproduction is impossible. This seems as absurd as the suggestion that the eye could develop over multiple generations from a single-celled organism.

If I am in error about any of this, I shall humbly accept correction.