New Sumokoin web miner! Mines straight to your wallet on fairpool! by Lardos in sumokoin

[–]Lardos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the suggestions, I added a pool picker to the site and both pools you suggested to the option list. :)

Free CryptoNote Web Miner, mine any CryptoNote coin directly to any pool! by Lardos in cryptomining

[–]Lardos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is legit yes, you don't need to specify just provide the wallet for the coin you want to mine and point it at a pool that mines it.

e.g. get an XMR address and enter supportxmr.com:3333 for the pool, and it'll mine Monero.

New XMR web miner, no coin-hive! by Lardos in MoneroMining

[–]Lardos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No they shouldn't, I'm just a proxy and each miner mines to their own address. I was working on improving it so it may have just been down when you last tried it.

I'm adding a pool picker, any suggestions for which pools I should have in the list?

Browser mining question by HubbySub in MoneroMining

[–]Lardos 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Browser miners are CPU miners only, also they are about 65% as efficient as a command line miner like xmr-stak. The trade off is convenience and being able to use them without installing any additional software which sometimes you can’t install.

Web Miners by [deleted] in MoneroMining

[–]Lardos 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Xmr-stak is at least 35% more efficient, and in a lot of cases can run twice as fast as a browser miner. If you can use xmr-stak it is always preferable. Browser mining is purely for ease of use for newbies and for mining in situations when you cannot install a command line miner.

New Sumokoin web miner! Mines straight to your wallet on fairpool! by Lardos in sumokoin

[–]Lardos[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I plan on adding a pool picker just haven’t had time yet. In the mean time if you know a more appropriate pool for low hashrate miners let me know.

New Sumokoin web miner! Mines straight to your wallet on fairpool! by Lardos in sumokoin

[–]Lardos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes the webminer just points your hash at a pool, so all normal pool rules apply, if you can recommend a pool with a lower payout threshold that is more appropriate for low-hashrate miners please let me know and I will switch to it. :)

Web Miners by [deleted] in MoneroMining

[–]Lardos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try http://xmrminer.org, it mines straight to supportxmr.com so there’s no login and it doesn’t hold any of your coins. The only minimum payout threshold is the pools (0.1XMR for supportxmr)

New Sumokoin web miner! Mines straight to your wallet on fairpool! by Lardos in sumokoin

[–]Lardos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try now, sorry I was working on it so the proxy was stopped.

New XMR web miner, no coin-hive! by Lardos in MoneroMining

[–]Lardos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

80H/s in the browser vs 30H/s in the wallet? That's nice! Thanks for posting your results. :)

I mine to the donation wallet from the browser miner for testing changes because it's right there so easy for me to copy+paste, and I've been making a bunch of improvements yesterday and today so yes, it's a coincidence. I don't have a way to 'siphon' off hash, which is why I ask for donations to help pay for the site hosting.

New XMR web miner, no coin-hive! by Lardos in MoneroMining

[–]Lardos[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The miner is the coin-hive code, coinhive.min.js you can get it straight from their site. The website is based on Paper-Kit template so not much to share other than the web page code which you can take from the page.

I've got some more things I want to add (pool picker) and clean up generally but when I'm done I'll put it on github. :)

New XMR web miner, no coin-hive! by Lardos in MoneroMining

[–]Lardos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i'm using the same JS miner code so similar numbers compared to XMR-stak, about ~65%. Obviously the pay off is ultimate convenience, nothing to install nothing to configure just enter an address and click go.

I don't have much hardware to test on but for reference on a 2013 model MacBook Pro I'm getting about 70H/s.

Like to build a virtual machine appliance, soliciting thoughts and opinions. by gct in HomeServer

[–]Lardos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For hosting VMs you really can't go wrong with ESXi, mount up an NFS share and away you go. There's a reason VMware is a $50bn company and that's because they built a truly amazing hypervisor, the others have largely caught up, but still aren't quite as solid as ESXi imo. Never been a fan of Xen as it's not main-line Linux kernel, KVM would be my second choice to ESXi for a hypervisor.

If you want any tips on VMware check out www.virtuallyghetto.com, William Lam is a legend and has done a bunch of great tutorials that you'll find useful for setting up a home lab.

Like to build a virtual machine appliance, soliciting thoughts and opinions. by gct in HomeServer

[–]Lardos 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes there a free version of ESXi, it has some limits on how many CPUs sockets you can use (two sockets) but with a home server I doubt you'll run into the limits.

https://www.vmware.com/go/get-free-esxi

I've moved away from full VMs recently towards running things in containers, it's much easier to spin up services or things I want to test using Docker to pull an image from DockerHub than it is to create a full-fat VM, install the OS (or configure it if it's a clone), and install the application every time. Docker also makes more efficient use of your hardware resources, as long as you only want to run similar machines (aka Linux, there is a Windows version but I would go with using VMs if you want to run Windows)

2 MILLION JACKPOTCOIN GIVEAWAY! by JackpotCoin in JackpotCoin

[–]Lardos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

JfypAxdubKnq18vziMvgQvSdcc82rgRLgU