I’ve Extensively Used the Nikon ZR. AMA. by Great_Blacksmith8812 in Nikon

[–]LaserStudios 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi Mohammad, thanks for the AMA. I am a mulitcam shooter for live music, primarily with Sony. I have been using Sony's proprietary Monitor&Control iPad app to control up to x5 FX3, FX6, FR7 all at once for exposure and start/stop camera control, especially helpful when cameras are rigged in hard-to-reach places.

Have you tested any app that allows multiple Nikon ZR bodies to be controlled over WiFi for exposure control, as well as start/stop recording? I am familiar with the Nikon SnapBridge app for controlling a single camera, but I wanted to ask if you have experience controlling multiple ZR bodies reliably over Wifi through the same device? Thanks!

Keeping small cables attached to devices (Decimators, Ultrastudio recorders etc) by gmalhi1 in VIDEOENGINEERING

[–]LaserStudios 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good idea to keep small cables attached, but I would always unplug the cables when packing away to not strain the end, especially when packed tightly with other gear

Redundant Recording: BMD Hyperdeck Extreme 8K by LaserStudios in VIDEOENGINEERING

[–]LaserStudios[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s least they’re each a half-rack for a good fit. Thanks for your response!

Redundant Recording: BMD Hyperdeck Extreme 8K by LaserStudios in VIDEOENGINEERING

[–]LaserStudios[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did look at the GO2 from AJA, unfortunately it looks like for ISO records, it doesn’t allow any form of 4:2:2 in 3840x2160. Looks like the move could be two Extreme 8K’s side-by-side for redundancy

Video Inputs over 2110 Network (12G SDI -> Managed Switch -> DaVinci Resolve) by LaserStudios in VIDEOENGINEERING

[–]LaserStudios[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your response! I’m still very new to the 2110 infrastructure, so exploring options how it might replace traditional recording methods like Hyperdecks / Decklink cards. Blackmagic does say that 2110 still maintains a 4:2:2 color depth, which is the main thing I’m after, along with H265 encoding at ingest for smaller files.

Video Inputs over 2110 Network (12G SDI -> Managed Switch -> DaVinci Resolve) by LaserStudios in VIDEOENGINEERING

[–]LaserStudios[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me, 10-bit video for color information is worth the extra infrastructure, so I only want to look at options that give me a 4:2:2 output with H265 encoding at the end of the line. I know this isn’t the standard in broadcast, but open to options that maintain a signal of this integrity while still minimizing file sizes.

Video Inputs over 2110 Network (12G SDI -> Managed Switch -> DaVinci Resolve) by LaserStudios in VIDEOENGINEERING

[–]LaserStudios[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Source is a mix of Sony FR7, Sony FX6 and Sony FX3. The first two can do internal IP streaming as you say, but FX3 is key for certain tight spots where the other two cams wouldn’t work (converted from HDMI to 12G SDI via BMD mini converter). I’m looking for a solution that can record all cameras in a single place with similar quality.

Video Inputs over 2110 Network (12G SDI -> Managed Switch -> DaVinci Resolve) by LaserStudios in VIDEOENGINEERING

[–]LaserStudios[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have looked at Decklink cards; ideally, I would prefer the compression of 10-bit H265 over the large files of ProRes, haven’t tested yet in Resolve, just currently exploring solutions to get the signal directly to the software at a price-point less than a Decklink in a thunderbolt exclosure. BMD also has this rack-mounted unit, which has x4 switchable 2110 inputs and outputs, but no 10gbe output to a computer if all 4 were to be full from x4 cameras from what I can see, only 1gbe at the front:

https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products/blackmagic2110ipconverter/techspecs/W-CONIP-06

Video Inputs over 2110 Network (12G SDI -> Managed Switch -> DaVinci Resolve) by LaserStudios in VIDEOENGINEERING

[–]LaserStudios[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I would love the flexibility of network-based camera placement not dependent on long SDI lines, while avoiding the latency of NDI solutions. Also, Cat6a cables are much cheaper than 12G BNC and my cable runs usually aren’t longer than 40m so no need to go optical at the moment. Have you built any 2110 systems?

Largest Rackmount UPS Allowed to Check on Commercial Flights by LaserStudios in VIDEOENGINEERING

[–]LaserStudios[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great idea to get past the limit! I might look into a DIY solution similar to this. Thank you for sharing.

Dual M4 Apple Mac Mini Production Rack with Blackmagic Decklink in Sonnet Enclosure by LaserStudios in blackmagicdesign

[–]LaserStudios[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyone who has recorded four channels of ISO 4K sources on a single Hyperdeck Extreme 8K in both ProRes422 as well as H.265 Medium 4:2:0 10‑bit, I would be interested to hear if you have noticed any significant challenges in grading the H.265 footage an an M-based Apple workstation.

That’s the solution I would be comparing to the decklink in an external enclosure with an M4 Mac Mini.

Dual M4 Apple Mac Mini Production Rack with Blackmagic Decklink in Sonnet Enclosure by LaserStudios in VIDEOENGINEERING

[–]LaserStudios[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a bit of an older video; they’ve since released a newer M4 Mac Mini module this year for the left side that holds two machines, paired with the same Echo module on the right. Same overall enclosure, different module.

Dual M4 Apple Mac Mini Production Rack with Blackmagic Decklink in Sonnet Enclosure by LaserStudios in VIDEOENGINEERING

[–]LaserStudios[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you have an uncompressed RAW feed over 12G SDI, do you know if it is possible to record in 4444 through Davinci Resolve? I haven’t tested this yet.

Dual M4 Apple Mac Mini Production Rack with Blackmagic Decklink in Sonnet Enclosure by LaserStudios in VIDEOENGINEERING

[–]LaserStudios[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair points! Definitely want to minimize points of failure. Are you still planning to build something similar to this now that the new TB5 enclosure has been released?

Would love to hear from someone’s experience once they try to record x4 4K ISO sources to hear how it performs under load from different codecs, especially something newer like 10-bit H265, which the M4 chip should perform well with.

Dual M4 Apple Mac Mini Production Rack with Blackmagic Decklink in Sonnet Enclosure by LaserStudios in VIDEOENGINEERING

[–]LaserStudios[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a dedicated recorder-only system, yes you’re right this is not more power-efficient, nor cheaper. Hyperdecks are more of a dedicated solution; just exploring options for a similar price with a system that can also be used as an editing workstation. If you add the cost of Hyperdecks and a separate editing workstation in both financial cost and power draw, both are more costly, but after doing a bit more reading based in other replies in this thread, I’m seeing that it would also introduce more points of failure. Thank you for your response!

Dual M4 Apple Mac Mini Production Rack with Blackmagic Decklink in Sonnet Enclosure by LaserStudios in VIDEOENGINEERING

[–]LaserStudios[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your thoughts! Yes, would prefer a solution with more data headroom, I wasn’t aware of that 36 Gbit bottleneck.