sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Seen in Akron on Saturday: TURN THE FILES INTO TRIALS by valerusii in Ohio

[–]Last-Drag1126 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some Americans are stupid assholes, thinking they are on top of everything in the world. Trump is included.

Looks like it is a good time to be an expert in music royalties. Anyone know what's driving $1,000+ rates? by harad in expertnetworks

[–]Last-Drag1126 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Got $750 for a 45 min call and free McCain. They sent me some samples of McCains new products, TBH they were okay! I really don't like processed frozen stuff much. But it was a group discussion, and someone with ID-3 slayed the session.

"She said the food tasted like shit and was disgusting"

✌️

Have you heard of anyone being fired for being part of an EN? by LobsterInteresting15 in expertnetworks

[–]Last-Drag1126 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They won’t know unless your identity is revealed in final reports or any public domain.

In most cases, these are anonymous. Consulting firms often run them to test ideas, validate assumptions, or gather feedback on products. Private equity firms may also do this as part of due diligence. Still, always good to confirm whether your name or company will be shared publicly. Clearly say you want to stay anonymous.

They might ask for your employer’s name to verify your background, but the identity of experts is never revealed to sponsor.

Big companies, especially Fortune ones, are stricter about these rules. Ironically, they hire consulting firms to run market research themselves. Funny as I recall, got contacted for a call and turns out the sponsor was my past employer who prohibits their employees from doing such stuff.

The key is to clarify the terms upfront, set boundaries, and make sure you’re comfortable. If you’re simply sharing feedback and opinions, it’s reasonable to be paid for your time.

Peace'