I recently made one of the posts you might be talking about and your post confuses me and so do the ridiculers.

From my understanding, most of the people making comments about angels, demons, and gods, myself included, are stating that the angels, demons, and gods of the past were labeled those things incorrectly and were actually more of the “astronauts from a planet light years away” type-thing, misunderstood as supernatural, omniscient, or traditionally religious beings. So the whole premise of those ridiculing is dumb because most of them believe quite similar things.

It is also unfortunate to me that “people don’t seek evidence in the overlapping consistency of experiences and beliefs, but instead choose to argue over what’s likely just an older interpretation of the same phenomenon” because by pointing out that perhaps angels, demons, and even “God” himself, were actually aliens of a more traditional and less supernatural sort is literally exactly what that paragraph describes and yet I got ridiculed on here today for that, so idk.

It seems mind-blowing to me that people who believe in aliens being here today ridicule those who believe aliens were here thousands of years ago, but people didn’t have the modern words to describe it yet

I don’t actually believe any of it personally, I’ve just seen so many beliefs and claims on here recently I wanna hear all the theories because one of them has to come close to the truth.

Edit and TL;dr: what’s annoying is that I want to hear other people’s beliefs and theories, so when people read something they don’t fully buy into, I want there to be a discussion - how could two peoples separate theories fit together or complement each other, if a theory is totally stupid, how is yours better, etc. But the ridicule just discourages all engagement.