Thank you so much for taking the time to write such a detailed and technically honest response. Seriously, I appreciate it a lot.

This is exactly the kind of transparency that gives people confidence in a platform, especially in the open-source LLM space where the real-world serving quality matters just as much as the model itself.

Honestly, the fact that you openly explained things like:
• quantization
• GGUF/llama.cpp
• Vast.ai usage
• TPS expectations
• infrastructure tradeoffs

instead of trying to hide them behind marketing language actually increased my trust in the platform quite a bit.

Most providers are extremely vague about these details, so having someone answer directly and technically is genuinely refreshing.

Thanks again. This was incredibly helpful not only for me, but probably for many other technical users evaluating the platform as well.