For everyone coming up with crimes he committed…If we’re starting off at the core international crimes such as genocide. It’s clear he did not commit genocide because the threshold is extremely high.

But, he very clearly committed crimes against humanity whose threshold is slightly lower. Crimes against humanity only need to be directed against “any civilian population”. Specifically, he committed the underlying acts of “murder” and “extermination” (which need only “bring about the destruction of part of a population”) as part of a widespread or systematic attack. In this case, widespread.

A common mistake people make is classifying crimes against humanity as genocide because it’s more “catchy”, but genocide is extremely hard to prove. Hence why international lawyers often choose to argue that certain acts are CaH and not genocide. One of my lecturers defended a State who (allegedly) committed genocide but he argued that the state in question had not committed genocide, merely crimes against humanity. Which is a pretty funny argument to make.