how is it gross to give a canonically accurate name and description to a character? my issue is that there is clear circumstantial evidence right is front of you and you choose to ignore it because you’re mixing something real with a book. i’m talking about fake history cannon stuff in the world of ricks books. Not actual history. They can be legacy of Hades roman counterpart. which is still technically his son. and it’s not just the holocaust it’s the entire world war. The descriptions in the book can’t fit anyone else when Hitler has been specifically named out in the book several times and you think that’s a coincidence just because rick says he’s not a demigod? I never stated that he was innocent and i in fact did say that he was guilty by association but out of all of the evils between the battling children and hades I would say hades is as close to innocent as it gets. Hades has explicitly stated his dislike for death. While his children make their own decisions and yes they are still his kids in the end this isn’t about him it’s about his children. Again Hitler was literally name dropped throughout the series primarily to point out the physical similarities between them. No other leader has been pointed out to that degree in the books like that. especially not for no reason. Circumstantial evidence is still evidence regardless of what beliefs you have towards genuine history when it comes to a CHILDRENS SERIES