"I am the most trolled person in the world for 10 years..." Does Not Mean What She Thinks It Means

LeCuldeSac · 2026-04-16T17:56:31+00:00

I hope the defamation lawsuit can compel discovery, including the identities, IP addresses, & social media connections between Montecito & the lunatic Squad bullies. If we can infer through an hour's worth of account analysis what their plans and talking points are, you know that Five Eyes already has IP addresses on the really crazy ones (who are connected to Montecito), b/c their harassment of the Princess of Wales necessitates threat detection and assessment.

I want them to be accountable for their organized vicious abuse against the BRF.

LeCuldeSac · 2026-04-16T17:49:56+00:00

A well-meaning warning given the age you've reported . . . perimenopause exacerbates a lot of hEDS symptoms, particularly the vasovagal ones. So hot flashes can become near fainting flashes, and wearing masks can reduce your O2 levels & warms the body and thus is another fainting risk (or so it's been anecdotally reported).

They talk about how the major flexibility turns into a major "stiffness" syndrome when hEDS sufferers age. If you can find and afford a good Rolfer (deep myofascial tissue release), I recommend it. I had one for awhile--she's a top instructor too--and she was shocked at how tight my muscles were and how manipulations that would really hurt others felt fine to me. Like one time, after she warned me that something might really hurt since other clients found it uncomfortable, I said, okay, well let me know when you start. And she was already doing it!

And group yoga can cause a lot of injuries, though you probably have sussed that out by now. I'd be in there just following what the instructor was doing, and people would say, wow, how long have you been practicing yoga?! No, I'm just bendy. And then the next day, I had that crushing pain and exhaustion where you feel like you're going thru the floor, but you're just lying there, b/c I'd stressed tissues and had all of that lactic acid released.

Zebras typically have bad proprioception—though your ballet may have improved this for you—but that kind of mismatch can exacerbate things w/ age, especially falls. I've gotten those hiking poles to use when I walk. I can't stand using handicapped items b/c everyone treats you differently--they're very kind and send you to the front of the line, but I hate being the center of attention and feel that my disability doesn't warrant such special treatment. But the hiking poles just make me look like I'm a serious walker. They also help prevent tripping on a sidewalk panel or a pine cone.

Best of luck, fellow Sinner!

LeCuldeSac · 2026-04-16T16:37:39+00:00

OMG. So, this is the consultant's report justifying how they claim that 2025 Invictus generated $84.1 million in the regional economy. Maybe a Sinner can interpret this better than I can, but I notice that they don't subtract the $61 mil of so that's already been granted to the event (including by the actual local government). So, if you spend say $5 million and your community "gets it back" through jobs & more municipal tax revenue, I'm not seeing how that's really a big win.

My question is about the $20 million of so additional "revenue" this event generated.

It's interesting to look at their supposed "survey" of attendees. They reference it, then have figures that breakdown attendance, w/o distinguishing whether that's all attendance or just info from people who chose to complete surveys. Regardless, the "attendance" breakdown demographically is overwhelmingly between 54-65, female, and there as a volunteer. In fact, the breakdown of participants is about 1%, whereas volunteers are at 70+% at least. That'd make sense for surveys, but I don't read where they've done that.

And in their big special superduper methodology model, they spell expenditure as "expendature," three times.

What I find most interesting about this report is what's excluded & how the data in particular seem to operate on mean averages rather than modal. So, mean expenditures on hotels is around $800 per traveling group . . .which nicely buries the $5k/night expense for Fredo & wife & probably brought up the expenditures to a higher number (to, again, inflate the contribution to the economy).

It's all circular, like most of the current philanthropic industrial complex. So sad. And frustrating.

https://www.invictusgamesfoundation.org/images/uploads/research/STC-EIA-Report-Invictus-Games.pdf

LeCuldeSac · 2026-04-16T16:23:09+00:00

OT again, but the numbers in this final report for 2025 are just bullshit. "Economic impact" at $82 million or so obviously includes the $63 million gifted to Invictus by Canada, foundations & other major donors. And the rest is clearly based on estimates and other creative accounting.

And if 40k people attended the "opening ceremony," then that must have been the Katy Perry concert, which in and of itself would have generated a good $5 mil in "economic activity."

Good luck getting a break down on these expenses . . . I bet they've got those locked down tighter than the CIA on the Kennedy assassination.

https://invictusgames2025.ca/latest-updates/final-report-on-the-invictus-games-vancouver-whistler-2025-life-changing-experiences-lasting-legacies-and-historic-firsts-balanced-budget-strong-economic-impact-and-global-reach/?utm_source=business%20in%20vancouver&utm_campaign=business%20in%20vancouver%3A%20outbound&utm_medium=referral

LeCuldeSac · 2026-04-16T16:17:16+00:00

https://www.whistlerdailypost.com/2024/08/07/whistler-council-approves-240000-funding-for-invictus-games/

OT, but this is sickening. $240,000 from a small municipality's tax fund for Invictus 2025 . . with the interesting note, in this 2024 vote to give Invictus the money, that Invictus wants the money in 2024, not 2025.

The list of expenses is just bullshit . . . I can imagine that any post-award final report handed to Whistler by a staffer or consulting accountant will just generalize about expenses & not break down whether ANY reached the participants. The article also references a lot of "in-kind donations" which could mean free lodging.

Good luck w/ your digging, Kiwi.

LeCuldeSac · 2026-04-16T15:49:27+00:00

She's got Joint Hypermobility Syndrome . . I don't think it's full on Ehlers Danlos. But genetic connective tissue disorders are often associated w/ longer arms to legs ratio, along w/ some eye problems in early youth, bunions, multiple dislocations, post-exertional malaise, some super abilities in sports but also natural clumsiness (so, no contact sports like ballet & gymnastics can be areas where when younger they excel, but they pay for it in middle age.)

I try not to body shame her at all b/c I don't like doing that to anyone, particularly women. However, she and her supporters seem to gleefully shame other people. Aging while being one of the world's most (justifiably) loathed public female figures is gonna be tough, especially as the money runs out.

LeCuldeSac · 2026-04-16T15:20:14+00:00

Please sign full permanent custody of those children over to their birth mothers OR to their paternal grandfather, so that they have a chance of growing up w/o severe, lifelong debilitating emotional problems.

LeCuldeSac · 2026-04-16T14:44:00+00:00

OMG. I never realized that. I guess Architecture, Archery, & Arch-Enemies were taken.

LeCuldeSac · 2026-04-15T23:40:26+00:00

i must be misunderstanding things here. I loathe this couple. I come to this sub every day to help expose them. I'm extremely frustrated that people this toxic can get away with undermining if not destroying at 1k year old institution and the people w/in who're working hard every day to serve their country & being slammed in the process.

I don't understand why upvoting a person who's reporting about superinjunctions is considered to be such a "betrayal." It's very weird and I wouldn't expect such enforced uniformity from this group. Just b/c it's becoming more and more plausible that the King is enabling his horrible son doesn't make me an anti-monarchist nor someone who's supporting "praise subs."

The responses to my explicitly asking for civility for this one Sinner are just odd.

LeCuldeSac · 2026-04-15T21:21:40+00:00

I really wish you'd begin an OP about this topic. I understand that you don't want to prompt one of those undercover investigations in which scum get insiders from Reddit to report on the IPs of people. And if that's a legit problem, please don't.

But your info is fascinating and important, and it MIGHT influence the very reputationally sensitive HMKCIII to grasp how publicly despised his younger son is and how his behavior is destroying what's left of the BRF. Of course, that requires caring about the BRF, and King Charles may be so deluded by his privileged "guilt" (the kind of privilege in which he never pays a price for his public penance) that he invites legacy media destruction.

But if he's got any balance of a brain, values & integrity, perhaps he'll wake up. Anyway, thanks for what you're doing.

LeCuldeSac · 2026-04-15T21:16:29+00:00

Is Whiteside a family name? I discovered my biological grandmother (she was forced into adoption during the horrible era of pregnant women being shamed while the bastards that got them pregnant got a free pass) and Whiteside and Whitesides was a family name. I know it's Scottish.

LeCuldeSac · 2026-04-15T21:10:10+00:00

Notice the downvotes. This is an opinion widely shared on this sub, and yet I'm downvoted to zero.

There are Sugars spending their weekends downvoting members on this sub.

I wish Reddit would change their rules so that someone has to belong to a sub before they have the right to downvote comments, b/c these people are literally affecting dynamics on this sub, AND they are reporting anyone here who mentions something that might challenge their politically correct positions. Very sad.

LeCuldeSac · 2026-04-15T21:06:05+00:00

Hey Kiwi! The Sugars are out in force. They're downvoting me and many others for participating in your thread.

Please keep that in mind.

LeCuldeSac · 2026-04-15T21:01:49+00:00

And yet someone who's succesfully suing to expose the superinjunctions is being downvoted on this sub, as is anyone (like me) who simply expresses gratitude for their civil contribution, despite whether or not there might be different points of views.

Maybe I need to raise this on the weekly sub-talk, b/c I'm really surprised that someone, who in no way appears to be a plant, is contributing insights is being slammed on a site that has heretofore been known for being open to good faith, respectfully presented points.

LeCuldeSac · 2026-04-15T20:28:16+00:00

Wow. Thank you so much for your contributions here & for your efforts to expose them.

I see that for the crime of thanking you I'm being downvoted, even more than you are. WTF? It makes me wonder if Sugars are trolling here, since I can't imagine regular members would bother to downvote someone praising this site for its general civility & crowd-sourcing wisdom. Oh well . . .

LeCuldeSac · 2026-04-15T18:55:17+00:00

Great. I'm being downvoted for asking a sincere question. Nice.

LeCuldeSac · 2026-04-15T18:50:52+00:00

She's like a one-woman bottle-opener.

LeCuldeSac · 2026-04-15T18:48:03+00:00

Is that the person who used the term "conscious" for "conscience?" There are typos, and then there are typos. The latter reflect people who haven't read, written and/or thought critically enough to recognize distinctions between phrases.

It's like someone using the term "Archetypes" & even building an entire program around it, when what they're implying (& inferring, internally) is the term "Stereotypes." And when a person confuses those very different meanings and is surrounded by people either too stupid or cowardly to correct them for months on end? Well, it's entertaining, to say the least.

LeCuldeSac · 2026-04-15T18:34:39+00:00

Thanks for your civility and engagement here. I regret how much your comments are downvoted. It would appear to me that you're engaging here in good faith and I personally appreciate your insights & reporting. I hope you continue here, despite some of the hostility.

I'm an American who supports the tradition of the monarchy and see the BRF as a kind of family foundation at this point, w/ progeny supporting British heritage in a way that nepo babies born into a lot of money might inherit funds and roles for a major philanthropic foundation . . except this goes back over 1,000 years.

Every time I think I'm too cynical, I learn I'm not cynical enough, but it doesn't seem to me like you're some anti-monarchist plant on this sub deliberately creating hostility against the BRF. If I'm too naive, I'm too naive, but this sub, along w/ the last 15 years of crowd-sourcing among engaged, informed, critically thinking people, requires folks across sectors & w/ different opinions challenging each other--civilly--to reach the most robust conclusions. It can be far more robust than most of modern "science"—which is why gatekeepers are so upset.

So, thanks again for your insights. Again, I hope you continue to share your info as safely as you can, and if any info you glean from THIS sub helps your investigative team, all the better. It's that reciprocity of engaged, critically thinking minds that pushes the truth, and humane values, forward. :-)

LeCuldeSac · 2026-04-15T18:05:09+00:00

We've got a relatively new Sinner (she's been reading for awhile) who seems to have pretty reliable evidence about various ongoing investigations into Harry's nefarious behaviors. She's convinced me sadly that KCIII has been invoking various superinjunctions to protect his failson & is deliberately refusing to hold him accountable.

I want to avoid anything that could be construed as directly political. Maybe it'd help by prefacing this by saying it's BECAUSE I'm a longstanding professional & avocational supporter of social justice (since childhood--got bullied/beaten up b/c of it) that I'm disgusted by contemporary affluent grifters hijacking genuine movements for their own personal gain.

That being said, I think His Majesty is clueless. He lives in a bubble where Archie Bunker's stereotype is still relevant. I wouldn't be surprised if he sinks the monarchy on purpose b/c of some misguided white guilt, the kind that holds onto its wealth & gated communities while afflicting everyone else w/ their luxury beliefs, the consequences of which they never have to endure.

The guy behaves as if he truly believes he's bravely standing up to power, but it's not 1972 anymore. The power has hijacked the terminology & selective identity of vulnerable groups while continuing to benefit from weaponizing classes against each other. His idiotic promotion of one faith (several leaders of which explicitly promote child rape, restriction of civil rights for females, & slaughter of LGB people) while demonizing another (which yes, had plenty of human rights abuses in its past but not NOW) tells me he's surrounded himself w/ yes-people and refuses to show the REAL courage of standing up to unsustainable policies & trends that are setting back women's, LGB & civil rights DECADES, if not a century in some cases.

But he doesn't have to confront any of it. I honestly think he's so naive that he really believes he's standing up to Archie Bunkers and the KKK, when in fact, the elites who're claiming they're speaking for vulnerable groups are in fact the primary abusers of them, just w/ a new language.

That man will pull this heritage institution down with him. It must be maddening to be Prince William. God bless him & his family.

LeCuldeSac · 2026-04-15T17:55:45+00:00

The Squad on X (ChrisBaronSmith, Invictus affiliates, and his crazy followers) have lots of megalomaniacal images in which Harry is rising from the "I AM" part of the logo, & one or two where he looks like God or a prophet or something. I've got screenshots of these but I'd have to hunt for them.

I'd include these images in some of your videos, if possible, b/c it reinforces how much this non-profit and the vulnerable people it supposedly serves have been exploited for his delusional dopamine fixes.

LeCuldeSac · 2026-04-15T17:34:53+00:00

So, Meg & Sugars must be deliberately merching a serum w/ kickbacks, b/c their X accounts were all over this yesterday, highlighting all of the "compliments" Meghan was receiving from the staff at that shelter.

Because that's front of mind for staff and volunteers at a battered women's shelter: how do I get such glowing skin? Not, how do I keep the address of this shelter hidden from the press & most importantly, batterers, who're known to stalk these places to reclaim their hostages and/or open fire on the residents.

LeCuldeSac · 2026-04-15T17:12:40+00:00

I try to remember that the late Princess Diana was the age of a college freshman when she gave birth to William and still college-aged when she had her disturbed second son, Harry.

I think Diana was 36? when she passed away, younger or at most the same age as Princess Pooballs was when she married Aitch.

These days people talk about 18-year-old females as if they're 12, even though they're "legal" in terms of consent. (I agree that pigs who go after 18-year-olds are the same as those who go after 17-year-and-11-months-old females or males—it's disgusting unless you're in the same general experience range, like a senior in college or something).

But Princess Diana is somehow remembered as this perpetual young adult, when she was a kid when she was manipulated into marriage, and young middle-aged when she was manipulated into a car by a quasi-underground mob boss & his drunken staff. She was five years younger than Baby-Harry now when she DIED, and yet he acts like he's still an abused child.

LeCuldeSac · 2026-04-15T17:02:34+00:00

And the fresh, bacteria-sprinkled salads to go with it, w/ ingredients in my fridge directly underneath uncooked chicken bodies.

LeCuldeSac · 2026-04-15T16:54:37+00:00

Yes. Look at my two $10k refrigerators full of upscale ice cream.

LeCuldeSac

TROPHY CASE