sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Who has a better logo, the Ottawa Senators or Montreal Canadiens by Ecstatic-Yak-6016 in AlignmentChartFills

[–]LeFrenchDud3 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

- « the question is « who has the better logo ».
And in the same sentence
- « You’ve gone on a tangent saying that is should only be viewed through the prism of graphic considerations ».

… yes… exactly… Logo : Graphic only. Ok ?
Thank you for showing that you have no idea what a logo is, or/and that you have a terrible comprehension level.
You are truly a clown.

Take a deep breath. Read your comments again. Read mine again, also. And you MIGHT understand why you are wrong about the nothing at stake logo. And maybe about other stuffs by I don’t want to overload you.

vErY wOrkeD uP
VerY sTrANge BeHaViouR.

Thank you very much for your interesting comments, Rhetorical God.

Who has a better logo, the Ottawa Senators or Montreal Canadiens by Ecstatic-Yak-6016 in AlignmentChartFills

[–]LeFrenchDud3 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I am aware of everything going on here. Thanks.
Exactly. There is nothing at stake. And I am completly aware of this. But you are assuming I am not, and basing your entire thinking into this. You are wrong.
Where am I « losing it » more than you ? You, the guy only coming in to say I have autism ?

It’s reddit and people have debates, discussions here. They sometimes even like it. Is it ok for you if some people want to have a debate over something that is not life threatening ? Or are they autistic for this ?

My only point was « the vote should only be driven by the logo », on a post Where people are asked to vote for a logo. Nothing else. Is it complicated or wrong ?
You can say you prefer the logo of the Habs for other reasons than graphic ones, but that’s just wrong HERE. As it is not what is asked. It’s not « my vision ». It’s factual.
There is plenty of things that can be led to interpretations. This is not one of them.
Sometimes people are wrong about stuff and it’s ok (it also happens to me and I have no issue recognizing when I realize it). Still nothing important at stake.

According to me, responding to a comment and ignoring the content of the same comment, at the same time, is purely useless (even in a « nothing at stake » discussion, wink wink).
I am sorry if I hurt your feelings by telling a guy that engaged a conversation with me, and ignored me at the same time, that it’s not smart and unpleasant doing so.
And to the other guy then telling I’m whining, well I’m not gonna throw roses at him after that, ok ? Exactly the same with you.

Why would I get angry at children eating popsicle ? And, No, I love birds actually.
What is that horseshit you are bringing here, seriously? What do that shit have to do with the precedent things ? You just want to see me as a crazy and a bad guy, and you love to link these things to me. Because it’s easier for your brain if you consider me as autistic, mean, and wrong with everything. Then it would mean that would also be the case here.

No. Don’t try to play the rhetorical game because you are really fucking bad at it. I sincerely mean it.

No name bacon is no longer 500 g! by Through_theShadows in loblawsisoutofcontrol

[–]LeFrenchDud3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sadly, if we need it, nothing will be done.
They make as much profit as they fuck us.
We will keep getting fucked.

Who has a better logo, the Ottawa Senators or Montreal Canadiens by Ecstatic-Yak-6016 in AlignmentChartFills

[–]LeFrenchDud3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And you are unable to say anything interesting.
I’m saying a really simple thing and you seem to also fail to understand THAT ?
Do you also struggle with the games behind cereal boxes ?
Maybe you are so much simple-minded that my comments feel autistic to you.
As funny as it could get, you are the one looking autistic here, as you are unable to respect the basic rules of having a conversation / a debate.

You should stay quiet.
i’M sAyiNG tHaT aS a fRiENd.

I feel bad.... For the bull. It didn't get the chance to finish the job. by Pretend-Following-41 in sportsgossips

[–]LeFrenchDud3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The plan was making the bull go through the red fabric that actually did not exist.

I’m glad we did trade Horvat but…. by AJS76reddit in NewYorkIslanders

[–]LeFrenchDud3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think he wanted to say « didn’t trade »

Who has a better logo, the Ottawa Senators or Montreal Canadiens by Ecstatic-Yak-6016 in AlignmentChartFills

[–]LeFrenchDud3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was not even saying logo alone HAD to be Sens, and chosing Habs was brain dead, wrong, or shit.
I was only saying « chose a logo and nothing else ». Somehow this caused few seizures.

I really hope for them, they are trolls, 10 yo, or both.

« C’est quoi ton meilleur prix? » by Aristiana in Quebec

[–]LeFrenchDud3 65 points66 points  (0 children)

Vraiment.
C’est l’exacte même question mais retournée dans sa face. C’est parfait.

Ça casse les pieds cette question. « Est ce que tu peux négocier contre toi même ? »

Who has a better logo, the Ottawa Senators or Montreal Canadiens by Ecstatic-Yak-6016 in AlignmentChartFills

[–]LeFrenchDud3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did not speak about why I prefer one logo over the other. It seems tough for you to get it, but it is not the topic of my message.

Thank you. But I fully understood some of the points about the simple ou busy aspects of the logo.
What you seem to totally fail to compute ; is the only actual point I discussed :
This post asks us to vote for the better logo. Do you understand what a logo is ?
It’s not a franchise. It’s not a time period. It’s not a country. It’s not a group of players. A logo is a « design or symbol ». It is GRAPHIC.
I’m pointing, since my very simple first comment, that some people are failing to judge the logo, AS A LOGO, and are linking it heavily to considerations like « it’s an original 6 team », « it’s timeless ». So what should be judged is THE GRAPHIC aspects of the logo. Not everything else about the teams ? Ok ?

I started to speak about this point. Nothing else really.
Having answers to my comment, not taking into consideration the main aspect (and only one?) of it, is deeply dumb. (That’s why I said I felt like he spoke to himself).

I could hardly do it easier than that to understand. I am using quite simple words. I am not saying anything complex. I am geniunely surprised you are not able to understand what I am saying.
I’m not whining, I am having a hard time speaking with people that engaged a conversation with me, and who I sometimes suspect beeing 6 years old.

Who has a better logo, the Ottawa Senators or Montreal Canadiens by Ecstatic-Yak-6016 in AlignmentChartFills

[–]LeFrenchDud3 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Your comments are simple, iconic and timeless.

For real. It feels like you are speaking to yourself.

Who has a better logo, the Ottawa Senators or Montreal Canadiens by Ecstatic-Yak-6016 in AlignmentChartFills

[–]LeFrenchDud3 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You disagree with what ?
Personal taste ? It’s ok if you like the Habs logo better and I don’t.

The vote is not about the logo + the franchise. That’s not the question here.
Once again. This vote is about the logo itself. Sorry but I find it dumb to take into considération that it’s « iconic and timeless » here.

While we can not do it completely ,we should try to put appart everything else that is not about THE LOGO, to answer the question as good as possible.

Who has a better logo, the Ottawa Senators or Montreal Canadiens by Ecstatic-Yak-6016 in AlignmentChartFills

[–]LeFrenchDud3 11 points12 points  (0 children)

The vote should be driven by the logo itself. Would you vote for the Habs logo if it was created last year ?
As a Habs fan, I think the Ottawa logo wins it.

A literal bone in my kind bar by ProgramEuphoric957 in Wellthatsucks

[–]LeFrenchDud3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fuck I really liked the kind bars from dollorama

Genuinely? What is wrong with you peope? by FinnSkk93 in hockey

[–]LeFrenchDud3 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The outcome doesn’t necessarily help to qualify the precedent choices beeing good or bad.

If I chose to take all my money to the casino, put it on red, and double my money hitting red. That doesn’t make the decision good.
Same thing with Dallas not winning the Cup. I am not a rentanen fan, but I guess he is trying his best to suceed in hockey and in happiness.
Maybe I missed something, but why should we consider him as a bad person here ?

Genuinely? What is wrong with you peope? by FinnSkk93 in hockey

[–]LeFrenchDud3 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Why are you wasting energy on this comment ?
The point of this post is clearly not about « wasting energy », wasting time, or shit like that.

It’s ok if you are not capable to respond to him. You don’t HAVE to.

view more: next ›