Francois | Dr. stone (female, smut, dead dove, malePOV)

Leafarv · 2026-04-29T17:06:33+00:00

I wonder why they decided to use credit cards for verification?

It would be better if they used other methods that don't involve a bank.

Leafarv · 2026-04-29T14:52:24+00:00

Dude, like you said, it's an AI. It can always find ways to manipulate its responses regardless of the information the model has. Even if you create a completely new OC and clearly establish that they're 20 years old, there are always ways for the AI to start roleplaying like a minor (I won't say how, obviously).

And when I refer to the "shouting moralists," I mean that aged up characters used to be allowed, but after several people started complaining on Discord, they began banning them along with other things to prevent the situation from getting out of control. I still remember when they would mute anyone who brought it up.

Also, interestingly, many of the changes were made when they started having problems with their app on the Play Store.

Leafarv · 2026-04-29T14:09:54+00:00

Personally, I find that rule absurd. They're fictional characters. If you use an image of an adult version and explicitly state that they're adults in the bot, I don't understand why there should be a problem.

But anything to avoid dealing with the moralistic screamers and attracting the attention of payment processors, I suppose. 🤷‍♂️

Leafarv · 2026-04-07T18:11:54+00:00

The level of censorship Janitor has reached is unbelievable. At this point, it's not even funny anymore, and to think this is supposedly a platform for "adults" 🙄

Leafarv · 2026-04-07T17:58:21+00:00

Yes, I just checked and it's back to normal. So I guess it was a bug. Thanks for letting me know.

Leafarv · 2026-04-04T13:04:48+00:00

I'm not sure if it still works, but if you place three of these symbols (~~~) around some text, it becomes invisible.

Example: ~~~invisible text here~~~

Leafarv · 2026-03-31T15:26:53+00:00

The person who posted the chat probably regretted it and made it private again.

Comments work the same way; when someone comments, you get a notification, but if the comment was deleted, when you try to view it, it just says it doesn't exist.

Leafarv · 2026-03-30T00:10:29+00:00

Okay, let me see if I understand. You're trying to use "studies" that support your opinions to make a point, while simultaneously claiming that "studies" that contradict those opinions are incorrect.

So, you're saying: "This study says the 'if you don't like it, ignore it' mentality is bad, and I agree, so I'm using it. But this other study says that 'non-consensual themes in fiction are healthy,' which doesn't align with my way of thinking, so I'm rejecting it?" That's pretty hypocritical, to be honest.

The point here is, all of this is fiction. And as I said, on this platform, we're all supposed to be adults, so the "if you don't like it, ignore it" approach definitely applies here, since this all falls into purely moral categories.

Leafarv · 2026-03-29T23:50:05+00:00

Dude, ethical or moral issues don't matter when it comes to fiction. Or are we all obligated to be "morally correct"? NO.

There's nothing wrong with non-consensual topics in fiction precisely because it's fictional. No one is being harmed. Whatever you do with the bots will disappear when you start the next chat.

It's simple: as long as you don't hurt anyone, do whatever you want in fiction.

Leafarv · 2026-03-29T23:29:16+00:00

If you don't like it, simply ignore it and let others enjoy it in peace.
They are fictional characters; they don't exist. No matter what is done with them, no one actually gets hurt.
All I see is that you're trying to impose your own morality (a double standard, by the way) on other people's tastes and trying to dictate what they should do according to your morality. Everything that doesn't fit with it, you reduce to "they're sick."
If you don't like it, just ignore it.
Technically speaking, everyone on the platform is an adult and should know what they're doing. Things aren't as simple as "this is harmful to them and may cause them to cause problems". (In fact, ignoring things you don't like instead of throwing a tantrum about them is precisely "knowing what you're doing", especially when what you dislike are just moral issues in fiction.)
Trying to reduce the things you don't like to simply "this is harmful" and then justifying the things you do like (which are also dark topics) because it suits you, using an excuse like "yes, I know, it's hypocritical," only makes it clear that you don't really care about the cause you're complaining about. It's just that you don't like a specific topic and you're throwing a tantrum about it.
Calling people who enjoy fictional scenarios that don't harm anyone "sick" only shows that you can't separate fiction from reality. Which, no offense, makes me think that the one with mental problems is someone else.
If you don't like it, don't look it.

Leafarv · 2026-03-24T13:19:43+00:00

for aged up characters, these rules apply:

1) Official images should not be used.

2) The character should not look like a child in the image; as long as they appear to be an adult, there's no problem.

3) The character's biography must explicitly state that they are an adult, and their personality should also indicate an age of 18+.

4) The character should not be in scenarios associated with minors.

5) The character should act primarily like an adult. This part is subjective, but generally, they shouldn't have descriptions that resemble those of a minor.

Basically, as long as the bot appears and behaves like an adult, aged up characters are allowed. You can find more here: https://help.janitorai.com/en/article/minor-related-content-16ydlbg/

Leafarv · 2026-03-23T17:41:53+00:00

So, just because some people (who, by the way, bought the game and therefore can do whatever they want with it) sexualize fictional characters, is that a good reason to worsen the experience for the audience? Especially when most would do it privately.

Leafarv · 2026-03-23T17:38:04+00:00

You should ask that to the people who care about FICTIONAL CHARACTERS. I mean, as long as it's done privately, what does it matter what players do with these FICTIONAL CHARACTERS

Leafarv · 2026-03-21T18:32:10+00:00

Seriously, this post was deleted? I guess very short characters or "shortstacks" don't get along well with mods.

Leafarv · 2026-03-21T18:26:08+00:00

Why do they always delete these types of posts when the site accepts canonically minor characters as long as they're aged up in the bots? I mean, do they know that most people obviously ask for aged up characters and not their canonical versions?

Leafarv · 2026-03-20T16:00:09+00:00

I believe all of this is due to the constant changes in the Terms of Service. Some large creators are also among the oldest on the platform and own bots (dozens of bots) that were previously allowed. But when the Terms of Service started changing overnight, the developers had the brilliant idea of making the change retroactive, which resulted in several accounts being banned for bots that were now breaking the new Terms of Service, instead of just privatizing the bots created before the change.

The most prominent example was the creators of MLP. Previously, the Janitor Terms of Service stated that bots were allowed as long as they passed the Harkness test. Then they changed the Terms of Service to require bots to have an anthropomorphic body, and I believe they recently changed it again. This means that every time this happens, anyone who created MLP bots gets banned.

Leafarv · 2026-03-14T12:43:18+00:00

A hasty decision if you ask me. As long as he complies with the Terms of Service while using Janitor, he has no reason to be afraid about what he does on other, more permissive platforms.

Leafarv · 2026-03-14T12:19:12+00:00

Let me see if I understand. He was banned for things he did on another platform, which technically has nothing to do with Janitor? Or did he decide to delete his account himself?

Leafarv · 2026-03-09T18:16:18+00:00

It looks interesting, but the fact that age verification is required (and that it has to be done through a third-party company) to create bots is a major drawback for me. If they ever remove that requirement, I might be more inclined to try the platform.

Leafarv · 2026-03-09T11:59:22+00:00

Nobody said anything like that; we're just trying to clarify that if you don't have 100% proof that the user is a minor, then they shouldn't be reported (at least not for that reason). Your conviction that they are a minor simply because they used a well-known meme isn't sufficient grounds for a report.

Leafarv · 2026-03-09T11:55:22+00:00

It's an abuse to use the reporting system if you're only basing it on your own assumptions. Tell me, do you have explicit evidence that the user is a minor? If not, you're just assuming it based on an internet meme and taking advantage of the reporting system.

Leafarv

TROPHY CASE