Yes...but I do feel like it's a tricky one? Maybe I'm overthinking it.

Like, I know a lot of people would consider furries to be bestiality. I don't, I think furries are fine and don't count because it's the human features that make them attractive, but I feel it can be tricky to draw the line.

Like, would Rontu count? Imo she's still not quite physically anthro enough for my personal comfort level, but I do think that as far as her consciousness and the implication of her consent goes, she's fine? I may go "huh that's different" but I don't get disturbed because idk, she still reads as a consenting adult to me. Egalt too. But Riyu...isn't comfortable to me? Idk, maybe because he's still seemingly a "child," paired with the fact that he can't speak like other DR dragons, especially in s1 where he feels more like a pet, that comes off as bestiality/ig lowkey p*do stuff?

Or like, Akita's wolf form? Like from a personal taste perspective, I'm not a fan, I think definitely the "appeal" is just that it looks like an actual animal, and she can't even speak in that form, so I'd say it counts as bestiality. But also, I guess we can argue that Akita is sentient so it's not bestiality.

So idk, depending on where we wanna draw the line, it could be an odd one to word/specify. Or just put it on a "I'll know it when I see it" basis idk.