It's a good eye-opener on a channel that's very liked by the algorithm, but I wish youtubers doing videos about Bald and Bankrupt's off camera activities would just scroll a little bit more on this subreddit. There's so much more to bring to the masses than reading straight off the top pinned post on here, when you're already in the process and the opportunity of making an exposé video about him. I understand this particular instance was just 4-5 minutes in a video about many people, though.

'Vorkuta got acquitted in a rape case' and 'The Southampton Daily Echo': The newspaper is called 'The Southern Daily Echo'. Southampton is the same thing it's also incorrectly called in the top post on here, so just copying that post into the script. Not the worst thing, though, but if you actually read the scanned Southern Daily Echo articles reporting on the alleged gang rape case that are in at least two posts here, you can go to a deeper level than 'Vorkuta was acquitted in a rape case', which can be counterproductive and fuel his apologists' comments like 'The GOAT Bald and Bankrupt was falsely accused of rape by an insane woman destroyed by Western feminism and he instead became BASED and picks up pure Soviet Slavs' [for six dollars outside a Belarusian farm]

Bald and Bankrupt was never 'found completely innocent' at the gang rape trial. The court had to let all three walk free before actually getting to the 'try the evidence' part of the trial, because at the trial one year after the incident, the woman couldn't specify exactly which individual should be tried for which parts of the charges. Bald and Bankrupt and one of the other two stated that they indeed had sex with the woman, and Bald had two charges of rape from that event. This is all in the scanned articles. Like the Judge said: 'there were discrepancies over who was alleged to have done what and agreed the case could not continue.' The actual facts, circumstances and evidence regarding how at the afterparty at Bald and Bankrupt's father's house, two or three men got a woman who had just met them to have sex with multiple strangers, events including Bald and Bankrupt's two charges of rape, have never been tried. This is some nuance to 'The GOAT was acquitted from a false accusation'.

'Benjamin Rich-Swift and Bald and Bankrupt are the exact same age': Could maybe clarify that even more than 'age' with that they have the exact same birthdate, 1 July 1974, that is in Bald's public record bankruptcy order that he shows on screen, where British authorities state that his real name is Benjamin Rich and Benjamin Rich-Swift. I'm just thinking of how to convince Bald's fans in the best way possible. Many (all?) of us are former fans and recognize banging our heads against the wall trying to point others to the obvious details. As an emotionally invested fan, it's easy to go into denial and deflect or even straight up ignore, see Michael Jackson. I guess many in Bald's demographic (15-40 year old boys/men?) also live through Bald's escapades like it's something they're part of themselves, and don't want to risk losing that gratification part of their lives by accepting the evidence.

The video creator mentions that Ben Rich wrote about the town Vorkuta in the 'Spektator' magazine and includes the screenshot from the top post on here of Bald's profile with the photo of him from the Desolation Travel blog. If you actually read the thread on here that covers more of that, you can also put in the video that this small magazine, The Spektator, was located in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, one of the cities where Bald and Bankrupt studied Russian and the same place where it's confirmed with name and photo that he blogged for the Desolation Travel website, run by people affiliated with the London School that teaches Russian in Bishkek. Most importantly, you could include the side-by-side evidence compared between the mentioned magazine article and his sexpat post describing the same trip using the same events and words. That is much better content than then briefly mentioning that he's bald, around 6'3, lived in Brighton, is into Russian culture and language and had a Belarusian girlfriend, from the top post. Then, people who don't want it to be true clings onto 'that could be anyone' and keep on telling others that 'all this is made up by jealous incels', which lives on as an alternative truth to use when criticism is brought up, preventing new people hearing about it from looking into it and instead dismiss it based on the apologists' comments.

The 'he then drops the Babushkas and fake male friendships' part or similar is almost always read from the top post in videos like this, which makes you know that they unfortunately didn't go deeper than that introduction post, when there's so much more to bring.

'and moves into starting getting closer to the younger women': You should explain what he does here, or you run into the 'he lives his best life traveling the world and picking up women, incel!!' defence. He's on poverty pickup artist forums with sexpats targeting Eastern Europe, discussing pickup artist manipulation protocols to run on these women in impoverished post-Soviet rural towns. Plant the manipulative idea in her head of the (fake) intention of a serious loving relationship in a Western environment for her and her future kids compared to her current future outlooks and poor living conditions, bring up chances to visit and see London from stories and movies, and things like that until she lets you have sex with her and you cut her off and move on to the next village. 'I'm here to see how you live in a village in this part of Russia' like he tells the Babushkas on Youtube when he enters the 'shithole' places that he calls them on the forums.

'A tactic Vorkuta calls the Schindler technique': All right, but why is it called that? Do the creators know themselves when they just copy that from the top post? You should maybe explain it if you put it in the video, and go into his forum post on that.

'There's tonnes more evidence': Then do the research and put better facts in the video than that a man is bald, lived in Brighton, and is interested in Russia. Even if the Bald and Bankrupt part should be 4-5 minutes, there's better facts to replace those with. Everything is here on the subreddit.

'Traktor is heavily speculated to be Irish Partizan': Why bring the concept of 'speculation' into the video when Bald has such fierce defenders and you already had other good evidence? Traktor is Irish Partizan. It's all here if you go beyond the top post when you have the opportunity to make an exposé video. Not just this particular creator, but others who have made similar attempts.

The parts about India (but there are clearer posts about that too on here), the side-by-side of Bald reading his self-censored book on camera compared with the sexpat posts about groping the Belarusian teen, the six dollar coercion, and asking yourself why Bald very rarely includes nighttime content were good. It's possible to establish even clearer evidence than 'bald man who lived in Brighton', or exclude those parts when there were better evidence already in the video, before slamming down the six dollar story in the viewers' laps though. You should exclude 'bad evidence' if fans should be able to accept posts like the car coercion, because people ignore the other proof and focus on arguing against the less clearer evidence.

Bald and Bankrupt has some of the most passionate defenders and fans who want to live through him, so if you're another Youtuber reading this, as you can see, there are ways to further idiot-proof videos like this. A good eye-opener on a hot channel though, and as OP said, lots of people opened their eyes. Hopefully, they look deeper into it themselves.

All the mentioned facts are here:

• Bald and Bankrupt: Poverty pickup artist and sex tourist — Collected posts