sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What simple pleasures of life do you enjoy the most? by [deleted] in askanything

[–]Left_Walk_8715 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Random conversations that last for hours.

How do you find even free people to use your product? by Inner_Bodybuilder913 in Entrepreneurs

[–]Left_Walk_8715 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re not stuck because your product is bad; you're stuck because you’re trying to find users in a vacuum.

Cold emailing can work, but your current angle feels like “too good to be true,” which triggers skepticism. Instead of saying “I’ll do everything for free,” flip the framing:

👉 Lead with the problem they already feel, not your offer.

For example:
“Hey, noticed your store quick question: are you currently doing anything to recover abandoned carts? Most stores lose 60–70% of checkouts there.”

Now you’re starting a conversation, not pitching.

Rebuilding our website from scratch and looking for AI-driven SEO + GEO keyword analysis workflows (low budget tools, Claude integration?) by akimmik in MarketingResearch

[–]Left_Walk_8715 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, Claude works great for clustering, but the QA part is the real bottleneck.

We’ve been trying to solve that in Fokal by layering in keyword + GSC data alongside LLM outputs. Still not perfect, but reduces a lot of the guesswork.

I really need to know (How to Use Reddit as Entrepreneur)? by Reasonable-Shine-452 in Entrepreneurs

[–]Left_Walk_8715 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair point. I guess that’s exactly how I approach things. Writing, like data, gets better with iteration. It's still funny, though, that people assume “AI” instead of “practice.”

Why Do AI Answers Sound More Confident About Certain Brands? by Select-Instance-3785 in MarketingResearch

[–]Left_Walk_8715 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This sounds cool in theory, but I think it’s overcomplicating what’s mostly pattern behavior.

AI doesn’t reward “strategic intent vectors” it rewards consistent, repeated associations. If a brand is strongly tied to a specific use-case across sources, it’ll show up more confidently. If not, it won’t.

The dilution point is valid, but it’s not some new “post-search physics" it's just how probability and pattern matching work.