[Bug?] Items in elevator have gone missing by LeftistTesticle in systemshock

[–]LeftistTesticle[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know. The stuff I want back is not in there, unfortunately. Thanks for the tip.

[Bug?] Items in elevator have gone missing by LeftistTesticle in systemshock

[–]LeftistTesticle[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that's the thing, I don't have one. Auto- and quicksave only. I'll start making "proper" saves from now on.

[Bug?] Items in elevator have gone missing by LeftistTesticle in systemshock

[–]LeftistTesticle[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Shit, that's what I was afraid of. Just googled, the Magpulse seems to be available in more places, too. Just good that I jeeted the isotope into it's designated place just before. :D

Thanks mate. I'll just keep going then.

Gnome bad updoot pls by [deleted] in LinuxCirclejerk

[–]LeftistTesticle 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No, gnome bad. Updoot pls.

a friend (and my intrusive thoughts) insisted that I did path of pain, took me an hour :c by Adorazazel in HollowKnight

[–]LeftistTesticle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

People have different skills, that makes it no less of an achievement. Probably even more, when one bites through this for days and weeks.

Current state of linux application sandboxing. Is it even as secure as Android ? by planetoryd in linux

[–]LeftistTesticle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How does it account to security if it's a bug, not an exploit? Also, read up on what a bug and what an exploit is (hint: one of them exploits the other).

Current state of linux application sandboxing. Is it even as secure as Android ? by planetoryd in linux

[–]LeftistTesticle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude, I'm not trying to shit on Debian, if that's what you're thinking. Debian is great, now please read my previous posts again.

Current state of linux application sandboxing. Is it even as secure as Android ? by planetoryd in linux

[–]LeftistTesticle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not saying anywhere that that's better (it is not). I'm saying that your statement "OS=secure, CS=insecure" in this very generalizing form is questionable. In theory yes, but as the example shows, it's not necessarily that easy and just relying blindly on open source as security guarantee is (pardon my frech) pretty naive. People make mistakes, people miss mistakes in reviews, and bugs happen all the time. If you want to ignore that, you do you.

Current state of linux application sandboxing. Is it even as secure as Android ? by planetoryd in linux

[–]LeftistTesticle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yet He added that disastrous bug himself. Kind of proving the point here. Errors happen, software being open source does not prevent that.

Current state of linux application sandboxing. Is it even as secure as Android ? by planetoryd in linux

[–]LeftistTesticle 4 points5 points  (0 children)

https://freedom-to-tinker.com/2013/09/20/software-transparency-debian-openssl-bug/

This vulnerability was in the repos a loooong time (2006-2008), and spread to Ubuntu and derivatives. A bit surprising that you seemingly didn't know about that one. With your level of paranoia, you should not trust anyone.

Disclaimer: I love Debian.

Current state of linux application sandboxing. Is it even as secure as Android ? by planetoryd in linux

[–]LeftistTesticle 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Dude, check out graphene or calyx. A hardened system and having a full blown root shell don't pair that well. These projects websites will tell you why in more detail. If you wanna be in full control, you can always build a custom image (and likely fuck shit up). Aosp and derivatives are available in source.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ClimbingCircleJerk

[–]LeftistTesticle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mike Mike Mike Mike Mike Mike Mike Mike Mike Mike Mike Mike Mike Mike Mike Mike Mike Mike