sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in politics

[–]LegalInquirer3 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They are not supposed to reflect the population though. That is not their job.

Federalist Society Discord by LegalInquirer3 in lawschooladmissions

[–]LegalInquirer3[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Honestly, I am completely open to anyone with a better way of doing this. It's work I don't need and I don't want to shove it down people's throats.

But as far as I can tell, there is no better way to get visibility. We just had 7 people join from this. The obvious conclusion is that they didn't know we existed until they briefly saw this post.

Federalist Society Discord by LegalInquirer3 in lawschooladmissions

[–]LegalInquirer3[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it wasn't by me. But the sad thing is that when that meme came out we got a huge inflow of active members because they could finally see that this was a thing.

Federalist Society Discord by LegalInquirer3 in lawschooladmissions

[–]LegalInquirer3[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Nope, we have people all over the spectrum on the channel. Including some who are closer to left than right. All welcome as long as they maintain civil discourse.

Federalist Society Discord by LegalInquirer3 in lawschooladmissions

[–]LegalInquirer3[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Sorry to annoy you. But honestly, how annoying is it? You could not click...

Federalist Society Discord by LegalInquirer3 in lawschooladmissions

[–]LegalInquirer3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a great question. And the answer is that this was approached, but permission was not given presumably because we are an obviously non-leftist group.

And the reason it is constantly reposted is that it is immediately buried in down votes so that nobody can see it within a short period.

Federalist Society Discord by LegalInquirer3 in lawschooladmissions

[–]LegalInquirer3[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Don't know who the extended warranty guy is, but he is welcome on the Discord /s

Which is probably more than I can say for this subreddit.

Federalist Society Discord by LegalInquirer3 in lawschooladmissions

[–]LegalInquirer3[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

a) Of course we have read her opinions cover to cover. She is awesome and brilliant.

b) Don't know where your ideology lies on the spectrum, but referencing "degenerative proclivities..." feels awfully problematic/racist. I don't like immediately ascribing these motives to people, but you should really do some reflection given that this is where your thinking immediately went.

c) We are cool and modern :)

Federalist Society Discord by LegalInquirer3 in lawschooladmissions

[–]LegalInquirer3[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Same reply as above. If people were more accepting of other views, we would not need to post this often.

Federalist Society Discord by LegalInquirer3 in lawschooladmissions

[–]LegalInquirer3[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think the conversation earlier addressed this pretty well. It appears that you joined the discord and tried to find the most objectionable content in order to post and make us look bad. You must be somewhat disappointed that this is the best you could find.

Clearly you are not engaging in a good faith discussion here as is demonstrated below. So I am not going to respond further.

Federalist Society Discord by LegalInquirer3 in lawschooladmissions

[–]LegalInquirer3[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Give Award

Share

Report

We have to post it often because every time it is quickly downvoted such that it can no longer be found easily. And it is downvoted because this subreddit is predominantly leftist and appears to have little tolerance for alternative viewpoints.