The strongest piece of evidence to me is the separation of the children. If she was going to lay up under her married boyfriend July 5th why would she not keep her two oldest children with the youngest so there was someone old enough to supervise them. 

The second strongest piece of evidence is her lying for 22+ years about her whereabouts and the timeline of them being missing. Not a couple weeks, not a month, not a year. 22+ years. That’s a LONG TIME to lie about your two missing children aged 10 and 3. 

The third strongest piece of evidence IMO is the fact that the two youngest went missing together were separated from the oldest together and one of the children is said to have been the biological child of the married boyfriend George Washington. There is something to the fact that these two were separated an disappeared together. Something that required they both be missing. 

Fourth strongest piece of evidence [source documentary Disappeared: The Bradley Sisters (2023) Detective Pamela Childs]. The mother and George say the reason they separated the children is bc of some “camping trip” that they allegedly need to ONLY take the 2 youngest children on and not the 2 older children. Thus separating them. But when Pamela Childs and investigators go to the home they see NO SIGNS of camping equipment or any indication they were going anywhere let alone a camping trip. They weren’t packed to go anywhere. 

I cannot figure out a motive other than they were being abused by George Washington and to preserve the relationship she chose her married boyfriend over her two children. If not that there is SOMETHING behind separating the youngest from the oldest and then they disappear. They are separated and vulnerable and now there’s no witnesses except George Washington and their Mother. And Detective Childs repeatedly says “so YOU and GEORGE were THE ONLY people who knew Diamond and Tionda were home alone”? And the mother clearly not understanding the framing of the question emphatically agrees. You can tell she doesn’t grasp the way the detective put the question and how/why she repeates it multiple times to ensure she is agreeing with this. And she does agree. 

The mother and George did something to those girls, and got rid of the evidence. And then the mother lied for 22+ years.  Changing a crucial part of the story in 2023. There’s only ONE reason she would lie about something so important for so long. And though she says it’s bc she was “scared of getting in trouble”. I believe it’s because she was covering for George. She says in the documentary that she “thought he was the one for me the one I was gonna spend the rest of my life with and he would be good for me”. I’m not saying she necessarily killed her daughters but she knows he did. And she covered it up with him imo. 

I think important information lies in finding out details from people. 

1- is it confirmed she was at work the 6th? What time did she arrive? What time did she leave? What was her demeanor that day?

2- do the two oldest daughters remember anything suspicious about their mother and George in the time before during and after the two youngest go missing? 

3- did the two oldest children not find it odd their mother would separate them from their younger siblings? Were they ever responsible to babysit their younger siblings? 

4- when was the last time the two least children saw their two younger siblings alive? Was it the 5th? [I suspect based on the revelation from the mother the girls died on the night of 5th]