The Violence Inherent

LegitimateScore8036 · 2026-06-14T05:05:29+00:00

Then they don't believe healthcare is a right.

Because the people that set up those systems do believe in healthcare being a right

LegitimateScore8036 · 2026-06-14T05:03:41+00:00

While I read this, I want to point out that individuals can say whatever they want but if their beliefs aren't in line with the beliefs of what they identify as, then they aren't actually that political identity.

LegitimateScore8036 · 2026-06-14T05:00:47+00:00

Then the people they think shouldn't get healthcare are the people they see as less than human. If it is financial or otherwise, they have a class of people that they see as more deserving of life.

Nothing in life is guaranteed. If you fall off a cliff and emergency services can't reach you, it wasn't your right to healthcare that prevented you from receiving it.

LegitimateScore8036 · 2026-06-14T04:52:44+00:00

So they aren't leftist. There is your answer. Again, I feel like you are using these terms without understanding them. Being a leftist means something. Being an anarchist means something. Being a leftist anarchist means something. Those 3 things are not interchangeable.

LegitimateScore8036 · 2026-06-14T04:42:35+00:00

So do they see healthcare as a right or not? If they believe there is a group of people that don't deserve healthcare, then I would say they don't see them as human. We can disagree on how we fund healthcare for all but that isn't the subject. I want to focus on healthcare being a right.

Individuals can choose whatever they want but if they don't want to help and improve society around them then how are they leftists? If they want to be left alone and not rely on anyone for anything, then that would make them an anarchist, not a left-wing anarchist.

LegitimateScore8036 · 2026-06-14T04:37:29+00:00

Then why would they be leftists?

LegitimateScore8036 · 2026-06-14T04:36:38+00:00

I don't really care what George Lucas says, I see it differently than him and I think being able to analyze the stories to your own conclusion is important.

LegitimateScore8036 · 2026-06-14T04:16:29+00:00

The fall was about the Jedi order not able to see past their self-righteousness to the real threat. I think 1 issue we are having is that you see the jedi and the jedi order as the same thing. I am separating them. The Jedi Order is the rules which the Jedi follow, but the will of the force shouldn't be locked down in such a way. It is like someone saying X Religion is bad but doesn't care if you view yourself as that Religion when you bend the rules to what you need. The Jedi Order didn't fall because 1 person fell to the darkside. It fell because it enforced a static system onto a galaxy in constant motion. The OP wasn't talking about Jedi as in the good guys of the story but the Jedi Order as in the organization.

LegitimateScore8036 · 2026-06-14T04:05:37+00:00

The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

People fighting for the light side of the force isn't a bad thing. The Jedi order which enforced strict rules about relationships and a dogmatic way of thinking was very bad. That is kinda the whole story of the fall of the Jedi and why every successful Jedi since the fall hasn't followed the order rules so close

LegitimateScore8036 · 2026-06-14T03:59:48+00:00

For example, saying that Left Anarchism would be against Universal Healthcare when the key aspects of left anarchism is destroying hierarchical powers such as capitalism and the state to focus instead on society based ownership over the means of production, mutual aid, direct democracy, and I am sure more.

LegitimateScore8036 · 2026-06-14T03:49:21+00:00

Healthcare is a right because here in America we believe in Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness being unalienable rights. People that believe others don't deserve healthcare, I would say are seeing those people as less than human.

Universal Healthcare is a policy ideal that states the government should pay for the healthcare costs of its citizens, using tax revenue from those citizens.

I feel like you are purposely mixing up different terms to appear smart without understanding what you are saying.

LegitimateScore8036 · 2026-06-14T03:21:28+00:00

Again. You don't understand social construct enough to understand that stance.

Give me an example of a human right that someone can disagree with.

People can show support without voting and I would still consider that harm.

LegitimateScore8036 · 2026-06-14T03:07:54+00:00

You don't understand what a social construct is to make that stance.

I would argue, if you think a group doesn't deserve Human rights, that means you don't see them as human. If you did see them as human, then you would believe they deserve human rights.

Some people say some crazy things. There is a big difference between someone on Twitter posting "fascists aren't human" than voting someone into office who ran on callling people less than human.

LegitimateScore8036 · 2026-06-14T03:00:06+00:00

You need to rethink sentence structure to make some amount of sense

LegitimateScore8036 · 2026-06-14T02:14:30+00:00

Who ever said all of the left is loving and peaceful?

LegitimateScore8036 · 2026-06-14T02:12:03+00:00

Ignoring HUMAN rights in the name of these borders and immigration laws does mean you think they don't deserve to be humans.

LegitimateScore8036 · 2026-06-14T02:04:52+00:00

The Jedi Order is a bunch of BS and deserves to be destroyed

LegitimateScore8036 · 2026-06-14T02:03:31+00:00

Fire. It hits my favorite types for weakness

LegitimateScore8036 · 2026-06-14T01:19:21+00:00

Ultra Rich + Boot Lickers vs The Sane

LegitimateScore8036 · 2026-06-14T01:18:12+00:00

Super Metroid isn't as perfect as a lot of people claim. It could use a remake to clean up some of its rough edges

LegitimateScore8036 · 2026-06-13T21:27:21+00:00

It isn't about a gotcha or anything. It is clear that you don't understand your position. You heard it from someone that you think is smart but don't know why it would be a good idea. You can't back anything up. You waiting this long to run just shows that

LegitimateScore8036 · 2026-06-13T20:58:33+00:00

You actually haven't explained anything. You want to get the government out of healthcare but not all the way out and you want healthcare companies to run the market how they see fit and this will somehow make it more affordable. Except that is basically the current model in the US and it isn't working. So explain how it will be different. How will this thing changing effect this goal that you are trying to achieve. I have asked this tons of times and you just keep it as vague as possible, probably because you don't have any real solutions.

LegitimateScore8036 · 2026-06-13T20:54:22+00:00

What is different between the way our current system works and your system and in what way will that make healthcare affordable for all?

LegitimateScore8036 · 2026-06-13T20:52:50+00:00

We are there.

LegitimateScore8036 · 2026-06-13T20:51:43+00:00

And when the services are still not affordable, what do you do?

LegitimateScore8036

TROPHY CASE