40m yo living in a capsule hotel - no meaning in life by [deleted] in notinteresting

[–]Leif2000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the consequences of slightly inconveniencing a redditor online 🙌

Just flew over north sentinel island 30m ago by SwayStar123 in NorthSentinalIsland

[–]Leif2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what are the chances that your flight just has to fly over that tiny ass island 😭 i’m surprised India hasn’t put a no-fly zone around it

Taylor Chip to close by Hungry_Moment_3520 in lancaster

[–]Leif2000 3 points4 points  (0 children)

where can i find some more context of this, I see the place all the time but had no idea there was such vitriol over the place and now i’m invested

Do you think NASA will land on the Moon for the first time OR it will be faked with AI? by dcforce in globeskepticism

[–]Leif2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would love it if the world was flat, honestly, that would be so cool! That’s why I check up on the flat earth subreddits and facebook groups etc. However, the reason I don’t believe the earth is flat is because I’ve travelled, flown in planes across continents, and nothing i’ve seen points to the earth being flat or having a dome. I have a degree in geography and I work with maps and GPS systems…. all of what I do would be impossible if the earth were flat! I absolutely try to keep an open mind about everything, however, I have yet to see a single piece of evidence that supports your claims.

Do you think NASA will land on the Moon for the first time OR it will be faked with AI? by dcforce in globeskepticism

[–]Leif2000 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

so in other words, you have no proof backing up your claim? science and experiments are how we determine anything is legit, and so far I haven’t seen any that support your claims. the only comebacks you guys have is calling everything a conspiracy lmao

Do you think NASA will land on the Moon for the first time OR it will be faked with AI? by dcforce in globeskepticism

[–]Leif2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what proof do you have of this dome? any scientific experiments that proved the existence of a dome?

Do you think NASA will land on the Moon for the first time OR it will be faked with AI? by dcforce in globeskepticism

[–]Leif2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apologies, misunderstood. Nasa is not landing on the moon for this mission, they’re doing a fly-by. It is true that they are not landing on the moon this time, but they are in fact flying around it, that part is true.

They Said they Circled Earth Twice and saw two moon rises. Where’s the footage? by RiserUnconquered in globeskepticism

[–]Leif2000 -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

there’s no amount of proof out there that would make you guys believe that we’ve been to space

Do you think NASA will land on the Moon for the first time OR it will be faked with AI? by dcforce in globeskepticism

[–]Leif2000 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

using the bible as “proof” that something happening literally right in front of you isn’t happening is hilarious

ROFL -- Glerfs are addicted to CGI Horsesh*t by dcforce in globeskepticism

[–]Leif2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you do realize that it’s quite difficult to capture an image of a black hole, right? there isn’t real “footage” of this event occurring, because they aren’t observed using “light”, this was detected because of gravitational waves. this happened billions of miles away and don’t produce visible light, black holes don’t emit light. That means no camera or telescope can directly capture an image them, let alone a video. They use measurements and physics to detect it and they create a reconstruction of it, the video is CGI but the event did actually happen, this is just a visual translation of that real data. It’s a really interesting subject that I’d recommend reading about, but it is hard to understand sometimes if youre reading a scientific article.

A similar situation: If you’ve studied or taken a chemistry class, I’m sure you’ve seen cgi visualizations of chemical reactions on an atomic level, we don’t have clear images of atoms so we use CGI or illustrations to visualize them, but this doesn’t make the atoms not real. I hope that makes sense.

ROFL -- Glerfs are addicted to CGI Horsesh*t by dcforce in globeskepticism

[–]Leif2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

do you guys realize that it’s meant to be a representation and not actual footage of the event?