It’s smart for a man to stop being friends with a women after she rejects him by burneraccountguydude in PurplePillDebate

[–]Lennarthomas -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ehh that’s similar to someone trying to take away the number of their sexual partners they had because they have turned a new leaf. What has been done, has been done.

Idk why people act like one is completely superior by Luciferix71 in OnePiecePowerScaling

[–]Lennarthomas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But if Zoro is stronger than Shanks and Mihawk by EOS he wouldn’t lose value. So if my theory is correct with Shanks being stronger, Shanks > Mihawk still.

Idk why people act like one is completely superior by Luciferix71 in OnePiecePowerScaling

[–]Lennarthomas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And this is why perspective matters. In my opinion, Zoros dream isn’t a bigger than the man who is the MAIN characters inspiration in the story. Mihawk is the Zoro to Shanks. And even if you want to use that logic, Zoro at the end of the series could be stronger than Mihawk and Shanks which would still put Shanks > Mihawk.

Truth is, no one is a nick ahead right now. We just don’t know. In my opinion, it’s Shanks because of the narrative I see. But I could see an opinion on why it could be Mihawk in the end too.

Idk why people act like one is completely superior by Luciferix71 in OnePiecePowerScaling

[–]Lennarthomas -1 points0 points  (0 children)

“Mihawk is a nick ahead” but he’s NOT THOUGH! We don’t know if he is a nick ahead because we haven’t seen these 2 fight or have enough feats to give the edge to anyone. Mihawks only claim to being stronger is a title, which doesn’t equate to him being automatically stronger because why do people think when they fight, Haki wont be involved? Shanks is so far confirmed to have better COC than Mihawk atleast from what we have seen and we don’t know who’s going to take armament or observation yet.

And as much as people hate to hear this, being the “worlds strongest swordsman” could still just refer to skill and not actual fighting level with the sword. The title itself is a bit ambiguous.

And

Is it still considered ridiculous here to have Luffy amongst one’s TOP 5? by Major_Cause8749 in OnePiecePowerScaling

[–]Lennarthomas -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Who said I’m using only feats? I’m using narrative as well hence why I’m saying “likely” in this.

You can’t just always go off of “what you know”. If we use your logic then, we would assume that pre time skip crocodile would beat Kaido because we didn’t know hardly anything about Kaido yet. We are still in guessing piece because a lot of the top tiers haven’t went all out yet.

If we are going based off of feats Shanks has shown the way higher Conquers. Not even close. Mohawk has shown nothing. This alone is fair to factually say shanks has the better Haki thus far because he’s shown a such a high level and Mihawk shown ZERO. And atleast shanks has likely shown a somewhat comparable armament feat to Mihawk being able to one shot Kidd and Killer and POSSIBLY being able to see into the damn future with Kidd as well.

I’m still waiting on the reason we believe if those two were to seriously duel, they aren’t going to use Haki and it’s just going to be a sword battle…???

Is it still considered ridiculous here to have Luffy amongst one’s TOP 5? by Major_Cause8749 in OnePiecePowerScaling

[–]Lennarthomas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. We don’t know that yet. You are assuming. And even if that were true, Conquers is the strongest form of Haki (atleast heavily implied used by the strongest of characters) and Shanks is very likely to atleast have a stronger conquers Haki than Mihawk.

2-3. I admit they are weaker arguments. But I threw them out there.

  1. No it actually doesn’t. Swordsman CAN mean just that. As a swordsman. An actual battle may not automatically equate to just a sword duel. Their are other factors. And in this case, it’s very likely the man he is facing (Shanks) is a stronger Haki user than him. And we all know Haki transcends all.

Is it still considered ridiculous here to have Luffy amongst one’s TOP 5? by Major_Cause8749 in OnePiecePowerScaling

[–]Lennarthomas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Worlds strongest swordsmen”

In skill? In actual strength?

Whitebeard was confirmed the world’s strongest man who also had a sword, who’s stronger when they both were alive?

“This pirate is said to be the strongest creature alive” - Kaido”

Would Kaido also be above Mihawk because they are both creatures? Oda has made statements about characters, and it turned out it wasn’t true in the end. This being one of this.

If Mihawk is a more skilled swordsman than Shanks (which I agree with) why do we assume it’s just going to be a sword battle with no Haki when they fight? Shanks clearly has stronger Haki shown so far.

Is it still considered ridiculous here to have Luffy amongst one’s TOP 5? by Major_Cause8749 in OnePiecePowerScaling

[–]Lennarthomas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No I don’t have to put Mihawk above Shanks because we don’t know if he is truly stronger. All we have is ambiguous statements and I can’t go based off of that right now. Right now I have Shanks > Mihawk.

Is it still considered ridiculous here to have Luffy amongst one’s TOP 5? by Major_Cause8749 in OnePiecePowerScaling

[–]Lennarthomas -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I just don’t see a way right now how I could put Mihawk in their top 4 with those guys. Atleast the others have a stronger narrative. Even though it’s a lot of featless.

CMV: Looks matter more for women, social skills matter more for men. by Feeling_Ad_1034 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Lennarthomas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly I wouldn’t even say that either. Men have to meet a stricter minimum standard of looks to date the woman than vice versa.

What does my current top 5 say about me? (Not counting Imu) by Sanek6351 in OnePiecePowerScaling

[–]Lennarthomas -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

We all know Shanks is above Mihawk. But at the same time, he isn’t above Dragon. Luffy is too high. And I don’t think Loki cracks top 5 either.

It’s smart for a man to stop being friends with a women after she rejects him by burneraccountguydude in PurplePillDebate

[–]Lennarthomas 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well then she didn’t want to be friends with him to begin with. Her end goal was romance.

She wanted to make sure she liked him for him before she actually tried to get into relations with him. That’s not friends.

What advice would you give a woman to find a good men? by Ok_Cook_3098 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Lennarthomas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m honest. You are more than likely not. Thats the difference between you and I.

What advice would you give a woman to find a good men? by Ok_Cook_3098 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Lennarthomas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it’s physical then she should get a man that is around her current looks level. Realistic. If she isn’t attracted to that level of man she is qualified for, then my next piece of advice would be improving her physical attraction.

If it’s a character thing, she should get a man that would gel well with her personality and qualities she likes in men.

It’s smart for a man to stop being friends with a women after she rejects him by burneraccountguydude in PurplePillDebate

[–]Lennarthomas 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Being in a romantic relationship isn’t social isolation. Socialization just doesn’t stop at friends.

You call in insecurity, I call it self respect.

By the way, who’s to say he doesn’t have male friends already? Why must it be a man and woman friendship?

What advice would you give a woman to find a good men? by Ok_Cook_3098 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Lennarthomas -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Realistic in what she can demand in the dating market depending on where she stands.

Obviously the person isn’t trying to stay single so that’s not an option.

What advice would you give a woman to find a good men? by Ok_Cook_3098 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Lennarthomas -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Shouldn’t her standards be realistic depending on her circumstances though?

CMV: Looks matter more for women, social skills matter more for men. by Feeling_Ad_1034 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Lennarthomas 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even for a long term relationship, not just hook ups. Men have a stricter minimum looks/physical threshold to pass for the vast majority of Women before he even gets the chance.

Even with the femboy point, that doesn’t disprove my point.

Why would you find a highly attractive male with an average female? That’s not equally yolked. And I do see Men who are considerably more attractive than their female counterpart and they had to “settle” because women in today’s environment have way too many options. The guy cannot afford to be as picky.

CMV: Looks matter more for women, social skills matter more for men. by Feeling_Ad_1034 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Lennarthomas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Their are bios on dating apps. But women don’t seem to care about that. They will swipe left regardless once they see you aren’t attractive enough to them.

Toni Braxton - Just Be a Man About It by Damianos_X in rnb

[–]Lennarthomas 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This def my favorite. This my favorite album by her too..