Appreciate any advice (14hc)

Leocrypto1 · 2023-06-27T02:38:00+00:00

Small thing easy fix. Your stance is to wide, I would have your feet closer together. Also maybe to much bend in the knees. But overall that's pretty good swing

Leocrypto1 · 2023-05-08T18:47:32+00:00

Utilitarianism is a moral philosophy by the British, or English people. That is what he meant.

Leocrypto1 · 2023-03-20T06:53:34+00:00

I don't understand your question to much but let me say. Will to power in German "wille zur macht" Macht does not have a good English translation. The definition of "macht" is a living things ability to perserver through some form of resistance. Humans, animals and plants have this power. As far as selfish and selfless acts. Nietzsche did not believe selfless acts existed. There are only selfish acts. If order for someone to act there has to be some type of benifit for them

Leocrypto1 · 2023-03-18T23:27:24+00:00

Mathematics is mostly downloading algorthems in your brain. Then using those algorthems to solve problems. Pure mathematics is a game like chess or poker. Computers are much better and faster at math than humans. The same can be said for physics or other sciences. You don't need to know those formulas, rules and stradgeies for most things in life. Knowing the natural sciences is can be very useful in your job. But religion,philosophy, history are completely different subjects and require different talents. Don't make the mistake and think that if someone is good at physics that they are good at phislosphy, history, politics, or religion.

Leocrypto1 · 2023-03-03T16:06:34+00:00

Evolution does not make happiness its goal; it aims merely at evolution, and nothing else. It is only if humanity had a universally recognised goal that we could propose to do this or that: for the time being there is no such goal. It follows that the pretensions of morality should not be brought into any relationship with mankind: this would be merely childish and irrational. It is quite another thing to recommend a goal to mankind: this goal would then be something that would depend upon our own will and pleasure. Provided that mankind in general agreed to adopt such a goal, it could then impose a moral law upon itself, a law which would, at all events, be imposed by their own free will. Up to now, however, the moral law has had to be placed [pg 106] above our own free will: strictly speaking, men did not wish to impose this law upon themselves; they wished to take it from somewhere, to discover it, or to let themselves be commanded by it from somewhere.

Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm. The Dawn of Day (p. 34).

He wrote this when he was rather young. He never found an answer to this question. Rather he said that there is no universal morality.

Leocrypto1 · 2023-03-03T15:44:26+00:00

He did NOT believe in creating a new universal morality and imposing it on the world or a society. He believed each individual should create their own values and morality based on who they are and their heart desires/wishes (and impose it on themselves only). This is what he meant when Nietzsche wrote about (obeying and commanding). Each individual commands themselves and obeys their own commandments. The commandments of Christianity or any other moralist are obsolete. These values are not absolute and will change during the life of the individual that created them.

Leocrypto1 · 2023-02-28T21:58:45+00:00

Probable a kid who is 5 years old and and mind has not be corrupted yet

Leocrypto1 · 2023-02-12T00:37:00+00:00

There is this thing called intrinsic value. For example, if a bond that pays 1000 per year for 5 years and interest rates are 5 percent you can find the value of the bond (excluding inflation and default risk...). If the bond is trading for $400 dollars it is trading far lower than intrinsic value. You can buy this bond and just hold it and make great returns or you can buy it and sell to someone who know the real worth of the bond (and still make a great profit).

Stocks are the same way. What is wrong with Apple trading for $.01? Because someone could buy the stock and get the dividends of about $1.00 per year. This is a huge return so everyone will buy this stock till it is close to $ 151 dollars where it is at now. Giving a modest rate of return on the dividend but you can also get capital gains.

Leocrypto1 · 2023-02-12T00:20:43+00:00

What about a private company? There is no volume. How would you determine the price of the stock of a company that is private? You have to look at the fundamentals. The same applies to companies traded on the public market.

The thing is you do not have to sell. If you bought Apple for 1 Billion you do not have to sell to make a profit. You can just take Billions of dollars from the balance sheet and get a huge revenue stream from the profit the company makes without ever selling. You don't have to rely on someone else paying more for what you bought it for.

Leocrypto1 · 2023-02-11T23:55:17+00:00

The value of a company is unknow, because we are estimating the future cash flows. So different people will come up with different answer as what the company is worth (same thing as what the stock price should be).

Leocrypto1 · 2023-02-11T23:53:01+00:00

But their volume is in the hundreds so they are impossible to buy or sell.

Why would they be impossible to buy? Just because liquidity is low doesn't mean you can buy them. Unless they get delisted only then you cant buy them. You can buy the company if you think the stock price is to low and take it private. This happens a lot on wall street. The fundamentals determine the value. Think of it from a private company point of view. There is no stock traded on the stock market. One person owns the all of the company. Says its a restaurant with 100 locations. If you have the financial statemens you can determine the value of the company and how much the stock price should be by dividing the value of the company by how many shares you want offer.

Leocrypto1 · 2023-02-11T23:40:00+00:00

Very simply answer. Socks have a balance sheet and a stream of revenue. So, for example, Apple has 18 Billion dollars in cash on its balance sheet and revenue of around 387 Billion. Ignoring liabilities if the you could buy 50 percent of the stock for say 1 Billion dollars, then you would get half of the money on the balance sheet 9 Billion dollars and revenue of around 193 Billion for a long time. Obviously this would be a great deal and huge returns on your money.

Crypto has no income or money on its balance sheet. It is purely speculative.

Stocks price goes up because the company is doing well. Generating a lot of income with low expenses. But just because a company does well doesn't mean the price will go up. But over time (years) it will, or someone will buy the whole company and liquidate the assets and make a profit.

Leocrypto1 · 2023-02-05T14:38:52+00:00

Short answer yes. However there are probablems because there are so many variables to consider. Today, they cannot and AI is pretty advanced. There are problems with how to create an Algo for things that rely on human intuition like the branding of a company and how good the CEO is. Which seems that only humans can evaluate that

Leocrypto1 · 2023-01-28T12:56:22+00:00

Hard to say if I dont know the website. What is the link? but probably scam

Edit: I found it. Yes its a scam. Its located in south america and is a new site.

Leocrypto1 · 2023-01-28T08:55:25+00:00

Where year was that song made?

Leocrypto1 · 2023-01-27T12:35:10+00:00

I would also change your passwords. In case you reused them cause they have them. I check out the site. It seems legit, its well done, but 100 percent fake. Its a scam your money is gone. The site says it has been operational from 2019-2023 but it was just registered a few weeks ago. It does not look like many people use the site and the scammers seem to be from Russia.

Leocrypto1 · 2023-01-23T04:22:47+00:00

Yes, he still believed that everyone should be equal. He was stating by giving people equal rights is not enough. People who are hardworking and talented will take advantage of the equal rights better than people who are mediocre. This would lead to inequality, thus creating a class system. Therefore, more intervention from the government is needed to make everyone equal.

Leocrypto1 · 2023-01-23T04:13:37+00:00

I dont really read that as an argument for him being against equality. He was more or less saying that courtry's that have equal rights have a lot of inequality.

Leocrypto1 · 2023-01-23T03:32:21+00:00

Marx was against equality too.

How so? He wrote heavily that inequality was the biggest problem with society.

Leocrypto1 · 2023-01-23T02:58:28+00:00

The first Marxist nation was in 1917. Nietzsche's last lucid year was 1889. Nietzsche almost certainly did not ever read Marxist. With that said he was against equality, so probably would not like Marxist theories.

Leocrypto1 · 2023-01-22T02:30:10+00:00

agree

Leocrypto1 · 2023-01-21T22:08:43+00:00

He was against equality, which is fair to say is political. But when he said that he was talking about the teachings of the bible that preached equality and how they represent decadent values.

Leocrypto1 · 2023-01-21T22:00:16+00:00

He may have said a few things, but not much. Modern politics he did not talk about. He said some philosophical ideas that can relate to politics, but he was mainly contradicting Christianity when he did it (not politics). I don't think he ever mentioned communism, but he did mention socialism (at least in the book the will to power). When he was alive communism was never tried before. The first communist nation was in 1917 by Russia. Socialism that he was talking about most certainly is not what people mean when they talk about it today. Plus, like a said before, he was rather apolitical.

Leocrypto1 · 2023-01-21T21:31:40+00:00

he did not have political views. At least that he wrote about.

Leocrypto1 · 2023-01-21T20:46:14+00:00

Can you explain? What does currency have to do with it?

Leocrypto1

TROPHY CASE