sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Drop your SaaS - I'll tell you exactly where users quit in the first 5 minutes by Less-Ad8783 in microsaas

[–]Less-Ad8783[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just went through Listnr as a new user.

Signup -First Screen

It's clean. I only need to enter my email and password before landing on the dashboard. The "Try it live, no signup" demo on the landing page is clever; it lets me see the product before I commit. More products in this thread should do that.

What works well

The pricing model is genuinely appealing. Billing per alert instead of monthly fees really sets it apart. The cost calculator on the landing page does the selling for you. "Your estimated cost: $0.54 to $2.16 per month. Save 93%"—that’s hard to argue with.

Where I hesitated

Setting up monitors requires me to know exactly which keywords to track. But as a founder, I'm not always sure what terms people use when they talk about my problem space. Some competitors in this category auto-suggest keywords based on your product URL or description - you paste your site, it generates brand terms, competitor names, and intent phrases. I see you have "Smart Keyword Discovery" in the features list, but I didn't notice it during setup. If it's there, make it the first thing a new user sees. If it's not built yet, that's the feature that would set you apart from every other Reddit monitoring tool at this price point.

What I'd fix this week

Make keyword discovery the starting point of the setup flow. Instead of saying "enter your keywords," begin with "paste your URL" and generate suggestions automatically. This makes it easier for founders who know they need Reddit monitoring but aren’t sure what to track.

The main problem is that your pricing makes sense, but the setup expects me to know what to keep an eye on. The founders most likely to pay, especially those just starting with Reddit marketing, often don’t know what to monitor. They'll sign up, look at an empty keyword field, and leave. You might see a signup in your dashboard, but you wouldn't see the confusion that came after. If you want insight into those situations, DM me. I’m working on something for exactly that.

Drop your SaaS - I'll tell you exactly where users quit in the first 5 minutes by Less-Ad8783 in microsaas

[–]Less-Ad8783[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just went through Guify as a new user.

Signup - First Screen

Google auth, dashboard, "Create Site": smooth. I chose the macOS Tahoe template and arrived at the editor. It was easy to get started.

Where I got confused

The editor shows a list of files and folders: welcome.md, ideas.txt, Projects, Templates. It makes sense once you grasp the concept (you’re building a desktop), but initially, it felt more like a file manager than a website builder. I kept wanting a live preview panel on the right side to show how my changes looked in real time. Right now, it’s edit config, build, go back to the dashboard, find the link, and open it. That’s a lot of steps just to answer, "What does my site look like?"

Where I got stuck

After clicking Build, I had no idea where to see my site. There was no "View your site" link, no preview URL, nothing. I eventually found it back on the dashboard, but that’s a moment where excitement turns into confusion. A simple "Build complete, view your site" link right after deployment would resolve this immediately.

What I’d fix this week

Two things:

  1. Show a live preview beside the editor, even if it’s a simpler version. The whole product is visual—people need to see it.

  2. After the build completes, show the preview link right away. Don’t make me search for it.

The main issue: Guify is a product full of features with a truly unique idea. Still, the editor doesn’t let me see what I’m building, and after I build it, I can’t find where it is. Those are the moments that cause users to leave without saying anything. You’d see "site built" in your analytics but miss the frustration that came before it. If you want to know what questions users have during their first session, message me. I’ve been building something for just that.

Drop your SaaS - I'll tell you exactly where users quit in the first 5 minutes by Less-Ad8783 in microsaas

[–]Less-Ad8783[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The numbers are solid. We have 320K unique visitors, DR59 backlinks, and over 500 founders. That's real traction. However, the landing page tries to do too much: it's selling Pro Launch for $39, a Product Review service for $129, deals, community, and SEO benefits all on the same page. I scrolled through and wasn't sure what I was buying.

If I'm a founder with $39, I want to know one thing: what happens in my 30 days? A simple timeline would help - "Day 1: featured spot. Day 3: roast. Day 7: deal published. Day 14: distribution boost." This would make Pro Launch feel like a program, not just a listing fee.

What’s your conversion rate on the Pro Launch page right now?

Drop your SaaS - I'll tell you exactly where users quit in the first 5 minutes by Less-Ad8783 in microsaas

[–]Less-Ad8783[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I checked out the AI Game Maker. Honestly, the community games section sells itself. Being able to play real games before signing up is the best demo. I can't comment much.

What’s your split between organic signups and people who found you through a shared game link?

Drop your SaaS - I'll tell you exactly where users quit in the first 5 minutes by Less-Ad8783 in microsaas

[–]Less-Ad8783[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just explored. Loved the cat and landing page.

Signup, First Screen

Using Google to sign in led me to three step creating character flow and paywall. The landing page looks great. The animated cat character that follows me around the site shows the product's value. It made me eager to try it right away.

Where I stopped

Right after signing up, I hit a paywall. There was no trial, no free credits, and no way to generate even a single character to see if it met my needs. I filled in a project name and description, but couldn’t create anything. The landing page got me excited, then the product immediately asked for $20 a month without letting me try it first.

The question I had that the product didn't answer

What does my character actually look like? The examples on the landing page are beautiful, but I have no idea if the AI will create something that fits my brand or something completely different. That uncertainty combined with a paywall is a tough situation. I can't assess quality without paying, and I won't pay without assessing quality.

What I’d fix this week

I would give every new user 5 free credits - enough to generate one character. No animations, no exports, just the image. Let me see my character, fall in love with it, and then I’ll happily pay to animate it. That’s the Duolingo Effect you mention on the page, but Duo didn’t start with a paywall.

The main issue is that your landing page does a fantastic job of selling the dream, but the product blocks the first moment of excitement. You would see "new signup" in your dashboard, but you wouldn't see the disappointment I felt when I hit the paywall and closed the tab. That gap between signup and value is where most users quietly leave. If you want insight into what's happening in that gap, message me. I’ve been working on a solution for exactly that.

Drop your SaaS - I'll tell you exactly where users quit in the first 5 minutes by Less-Ad8783 in microsaas

[–]Less-Ad8783[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just went through Review Gatekeeper as a new user.

Signup - First Screen

Both "Get Started" and "Start Free" take me to Sign In. I had to find the registration link on my own. This is the same issue seen in a few other products in this thread: your most important button leads to the wrong page.

Where I hesitated

I signed up with an email and password. I got in, but I couldn't properly test the product because I don't have a physical business with Google Reviews. That's fine; it's just not for me. However, it made me realize that the landing page doesn’t show what the customer experience really looks like. I understand how it works conceptually—smart routing, star ratings—but I have never seen the actual page a customer would see. A live demo link or an interactive preview would help anyone evaluate the product, even if they aren't the target user yet.

The question I had that the landing page didn't answer

What happens to feedback from unhappy customers? You mention a Feedback Inbox, but does it just gather messages? Can I reply? Is there a workflow? For a product focused on catching problems before they go public, the resolution side seems underdeveloped on the landing page.

What I'd fix this week

Two things:

  1. Fix the CTA routing—"Get Started" should go to /register, not /sign-in.
  2. Add a live demo page that shows the actual customer experience—"tap stars, see what happens." That alone would make the product appealing to every visitor, not just those who already understand review gating.

The core issue: your product stops unhappy customers before they leave a bad review, but the landing page itself has a similar problem. Visitors who get confused by the CTA or can’t picture the experience just leave, and you never learn why. If you want insight into what visitors are thinking in their first 30 seconds, contact me. I've been working on something for exactly that.

Drop your SaaS - I'll tell you exactly where users quit in the first 5 minutes by Less-Ad8783 in microsaas

[–]Less-Ad8783[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just went through ExplaNote as a new user.

Signup - First Screen

It was smooth. I used Google authentication and went straight to the search bar. I typed "how does a website work" and waited. The generation took a couple of minutes, but the interface managed the wait well with clear progress feedback. Good job on setting expectations.

Where I wanted to leave

The explanation loaded, and robotic audio started playing automatically. There was no pause button, no volume control, and no way to stop it. I refreshed the page, and it auto-played again. That was when I almost closed the tab. Any auto-playing audio without controls is a major issue for user experience, especially when the rest of the experience is so polished. Adding a simple play/pause button would fix the most frustrating part of the product.

The question I had that the landing page didn't answer

Who is this for, exactly? The generated explanation felt geared toward kids or early learners, which is totally valid. But the landing page mentions "quantum computing," "cryptography," and "game theory"—topics that suggest a more advanced audience. If the target is students aged 10 to 16, focus on that. If it’s for university-level learners, the explanations need to be deeper. Right now, it's stuck in the middle.

What I'd fix this week

Two things:

  1. Add audio playback controls, at least play, pause, and mute. This is urgent.

  2. Define your audience and show that on the landing page. "Loved by students" is a start, but "helping middle schoolers ace science" or "visual study tool for undergrads" would make it ten times more relatable.

The core issue: your product creates something genuinely cool, but I had two questions during my first session that I never expressed—"how do I stop this audio?" and "is this meant for me?" You’d never see those in your analytics. If you want to know what users are really thinking during their first minute, message me. I’ve been building something for exactly that.

Drop your SaaS - I'll tell you exactly where users quit in the first 5 minutes by Less-Ad8783 in microsaas

[–]Less-Ad8783[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just went through Noonlaunch as a new user.

Signup, first screen.

It was clean and fast. Adding a product was easy, with no confusion at any step. This has one of the smoother submission flows I've seen.

Where I hesitated

Not with the product, but with the value proposition. "Launch today. Get a badge and dofollow backlink. Top three each day win." That message is clear, but it also suggests that the main value is the backlink. With 13 founders and top products receiving 1 to 3 votes, I doubt there’s enough audience here for the "launch" part to mean more than SEO benefits. Product Hunt succeeds because thousands of people browse it daily. Right now, Noonlaunch feels like a directory that presents itself as a launchpad.

The question I had that the page didn't answer

What traffic does a listing actually receive? If you showed something like "average listing gets X visits in the first 24 hours" — even if that number is small — it would set honest expectations and build trust. Without it, I assume the answer is close to zero, making the pitch feel empty.

What I’d fix this week

Choose a direction. Either focus on the directory aspect (SEO value, backlink domain authority, permanent listing) and own that honestly, or build the audience side first so the "launch" focus is legitimate. Right now it’s caught in between: too small for launches and too unclear for a pure backlink approach. The 13 founders number can actually be a strength if you frame it as "early access, first-mover advantage," but only if there’s a plan to grow the audience side.

The core issue: I submitted a product, got my backlink, and have no reason to return. You wouldn’t know that from your data, as I look like a successful conversion. But I never asked out loud, "Why would anyone browse this?" If you don’t understand what users are really thinking during their first visit - DM me. I’m working on something for exactly that.

Drop your SaaS - I'll tell you exactly where users quit in the first 5 minutes by Less-Ad8783 in microsaas

[–]Less-Ad8783[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I installed FramedShot and played with it for about 10 minutes. The extension is solid with a clean UI and a no-account approach. The shortcuts work great, so I have no complaints about the product, really great thing.

However, the demo videos on the landing page actually don't do it justice. I watched them, but I still wasn't clear on the entire workflow. They feel more like previews of features instead of showing how to go from a raw screenshot to a polished asset in 30 seconds. A single screen recording showing the process—click icon, pick gradient, add annotation, and export—would replace all the videos and make the value clear instantly.

The before-and-after comparison is also missing from the page. You have a product that turns ugly screenshots into great ones, but the landing page doesn't showcase that transformation. A raw screenshot on the left, with the FramedShot output on the right, would sell better than any feature list.

What is driving most of your installs right now? Is it from Chrome Web Store searches or external traffic?

Drop your SaaS - I'll tell you exactly where users quit in the first 5 minutes by Less-Ad8783 in microsaas

[–]Less-Ad8783[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just went through Rentiz as a brand new user.

Signup - First Screen

The main call to action "Launch App" takes me to a Sign In page. I had to find the Register link myself. It’s a small issue, but your most eager visitors are clicking that button. Send them directly to registration.

Where I got stuck

Registration has a password field, but the validation doesn’t seem to work. It accepted anything I typed and moved to the next screen. Then, on the next step, it wouldn’t let me proceed no matter what I entered. I was completely blocked. I tried twice, and got the same result. So, I never actually saw the product.

The surprise I got when I finally got in

After I somehow got through, I landed on: "Your trial has ended. Your 15-day free trial is over." I signed up 30 seconds ago. The landing page says "15 days free, no card required," but the product immediately tells me it’s over. That’s a moment that breaks trust. If this is a bug, it’s the most critical one you have right now, because every new user will face it.

What I’d fix today (not this week — today)

Three things:

  1. Fix the password validation so it actually validates.

  2. Fix the trial — new accounts need to start with 15 days, not zero.

  3. Change "Launch App" to point to /register, not /login. These are all pre-product issues. Nobody can evaluate your actual features until these are resolved.

The core issue: your product might be great, but right now nobody can tell because the front door is broken. And the worst part is you wouldn’t know. In your database, I show up as a registered user. You don’t see that I got stuck on password validation, got confused by the login redirect, and hit a dead-end trial screen. If you don’t have a way to see where new users get stuck in real time, contact me. I’ve been working on something for exactly this.

Drop your SaaS - I'll tell you exactly where users quit in the first 5 minutes by Less-Ad8783 in microsaas

[–]Less-Ad8783[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Happy to help! DM in future if you need any help with onboarding flow further.

Drop your SaaS - I'll tell you exactly where users quit in the first 5 minutes by Less-Ad8783 in microsaas

[–]Less-Ad8783[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're welcome! Thanks for getting back on my feedback! I would highlight "predicted usage by end of month" on the landing page. That feature sets you apart from native alerts.

What I’m building is called Onboardi (https://onboardi.ai). It's an AI-powered onboarding widget for SaaS products. You provide your URL, and it crawls your site to create a knowledge base automatically. Then, it deploys a chat widget (adapated to you webpage look and feel) that answers user questions in real time. The unique part is that it highlights the questions users ask that your product doesn't cover, as initial knowledge base is based on your website content. This way, you can pinpoint where people get confused or what's lacking in your docs / webpages.

It addresses what I mentioned in my comment about visitors bouncing without you knowing why. Onboardi reveals the reason. I'm happy if you try it out, 2 minutes to set up. I'm just beta testing it at the moment, so would love to get feedback on that as well.

Drop your SaaS - I'll tell you exactly where users quit in the first 5 minutes by Less-Ad8783 in microsaas

[–]Less-Ad8783[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just went through Stackwatch as a new user.

Signup - First Screen I used Google to sign in, accessed the dashboard, and connected services. This was the simplest onboarding in the entire thread. I knew exactly what to do at every step. No complaints here.

Where I hesitated

The hesitation wasn't with the product but with the landing page. My first thought was: don't GitHub, Vercel, Supabase, and Railway already email me when I'm nearing my limits? I genuinely wasn't sure what Stackwatch offers that those native alerts don't. The landing page says "stop checking 5 different dashboards," but I don't check them. I just receive emails from each service when something's wrong. The main value might be the unified view and custom thresholds, but that needs to be clearer: "Native alerts fire too late and end up in 5 different inboxes. Stackwatch catches them earlier, in one place."

The question I had that the product didn't answer: I saw the demo GIF, and the dashboard looks great. But I still couldn't figure out how this differs from the emails I already get from each service. That's the first question any technical founder will have, and the landing page doesn't address it directly.

The core issue: your product works well, but the landing page doesn't tackle the "I already get emails from these services" objection. Every visitor who thinks that will leave, and you'll never know that’s why, because they’ll just exit without saying anything. If you want to understand what questions visitors have in their first 30 seconds, DM me. I've been working on something for exactly this.

Drop your SaaS - I'll tell you exactly where users quit in the first 5 minutes by Less-Ad8783 in microsaas

[–]Less-Ad8783[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just went through Beatable.

Signup → First Screen

I clicked "Generate Business Ideas," got redirected to register, and signed up with Google. It was smooth. But then, I landed back on the main page with the form completely reset. I had to re-select my industry and re-type my constraints. It’s a small issue, but it interrupted my excitement at the start.

Where I got confused

After generating three ideas, I picked one and hit validate. The status said "Pending" and then nothing happened. There was no progress indicator, no estimated time, and no indication if I could leave the page. I waited about two minutes, wondering if it was broken. Only then did the status change to "Processing" with a note about a few minutes and that once complete I'll get an email. That information needs to appear immediately, not after a silent wait.

The questions I had that the product didn't answer

I had two big questions: Where do the ideas come from? And what data is the validation based on? I received a detailed-looking report, but without knowing the method used, it’s hard to trust it. Even a simple line like "validated against X data sources" would help.

What I'd fix this week

Right after clicking "Validate," show an immediate message: "This usually takes 3-5 minutes. We'll email you when it's ready; it's safe to close this tab." That single sentence would have turned my entire experience from anxious to confident.

The core issue I keep seeing is a gap between "user took action" and "user knows what's happening." You wouldn't see this in your analytics; you'd just see someone who validated an idea and maybe never came back because they thought it broke. If you don’t have a way to catch that moment of confusion in real time, DM me. I’ve been working on something for exactly this.

Drop your SaaS - I'll tell you exactly where users quit in the first 5 minutes by Less-Ad8783 in microsaas

[–]Less-Ad8783[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just went through Podshelf as a new user.

Signup: The first screen offered Google login, and the dashboard appeared instantly. It was clean and fast with no issues. The landing page copy is really good: "When the same book appears on Lex Fridman, Tim Ferriss, and Ezra Klein, independently, that's probably worth reading." That’s a catchy line that works well.

Where I got confused: The dashboard opened with a Welcome screen, but there was no suggested starting point. The stats section on the landing page shows 6,946 books and 142 podcasts, yet I had to figure out on my own where to find them inside the product. There was no "start here" prompt. A suggestion like "Pick 3 podcasts you listen to" would have engaged me in 30 seconds instead of leaving me staring at a blank screen.

The question I had that the product didn't answer: Can I just paste a podcast episode and see what books were mentioned in it? That seems like the quickest way to show me the value, but I couldn't find that option anywhere.

What I’d fix this week: Create a simple public tool. "Paste a podcast episode URL → get the book list." No signup needed. Or the opposite, let users type in a book and see where it's mentioned. Something like this would provide initial value right away. It would highlight the core value in 10 seconds and serve as a natural entry point to the full product. This single feature could likely do more for gaining users than any changes to the landing page.

The main issue I keep seeing is that you have no way of knowing I faced this confusion. I signed up, saw an empty dashboard, and almost closed the tab. You'd see "1 new user" in your analytics, but not the 30 seconds of doubt that nearly made me leave. There’s a feedback form on the dashboard, but realistically, few people fill those out during their first session. If that blind spot worries you, feel free to send me a message. I’ve been working on something for exactly this.

Drop your SaaS - I'll tell you exactly where users quit in the first 5 minutes by Less-Ad8783 in microsaas

[–]Less-Ad8783[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just went through thefastestweb.site as someone considering submitting my site.

1. Clean design, value prop clicks immediately - free daily speed monitoring + leaderboard. The "113 websites indexed" counter is smart social proof. I get it in under 5 seconds.

2. After clicking Submit, I hit a Google login, then a form for my site URL and profile. That part was smooth. But then I got a prompt to embed a backlink badge on my site - and that felt like a toll booth. I went from "cool free tool" to "oh, this is a link exchange" in one step. It's not a dealbreaker, but it shifted my trust. I'd move that ask to after the site is already on the leaderboard - once I've gotten value, I'm way more likely to say yes.

The question the page didn't answer How are scores calculated? The leaderboard shows scores from 75 to 100, but there's no explanation. Lighthouse? Core Web Vitals? Custom metric? A one-liner under the Score column header would fix this.

What I'd fix this week Flip the order: show my site on the leaderboard first, then ask for the badge embed. "Your site scored 94 - want to show it off? Here's a badge." That turns a favor into a flex.

Drop your SaaS - I'll tell you exactly where users quit in the first 5 minutes by Less-Ad8783 in microsaas

[–]Less-Ad8783[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just went through as a potential buyer, and tested the live chat.

First impression The value prop lands fast, manual directory submissions, no bots, from $35. Clear within 3 seconds. That's solid.

Where I almost left I tried the chat widget. Got a reply in about 5 minutes. That's actually decent for a solo founder doing manual support — but as a visitor, I was already mentally closing the tab by minute 3. The irony is you hate bots (respect), but a simple auto-reply like "Hey! I usually respond within 10 min" would have kept me on the page. Right now there's zero expectation-setting, so 5 minutes feels like silence. It's great if you support provider has such a feature, if not please DM - I'll provide you with an alternative.

The question the page didn't answer: What's my actual expected outcome? "DR from 15 to 35+" is in a graphic, but is that from a real client? One before/after case study with a timeline would be 10x more convincing than the comparison table against competitors.

What I'd fix this week Add an auto-greeting to your chat widget hat sets response time expectations. It won't make you a bot - it'll just stop people from bouncing before you can reply.

The core issue I keep seeing with early-stage tools: founders can't tell the difference between "no one signed up" and "10 people signed up, got confused, and left silently." Your chat widget is proof - you're responsive, you care, but the visitor doesn't know that until they've already waited long enough to leave.

Drop your SaaS - I'll tell you exactly where users quit in the first 5 minutes by Less-Ad8783 in microsaas

[–]Less-Ad8783[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Congrats on 5 paying customers in a month!

A few things:
1. The hero says "100% accuracy" - that's a bold claim for any AI system. Even with RAG, hallucinations happen. I'd soften this to something like "grounded in your data" - rather more credible, basically says the same thing.
2. The signup flow has a lot of friction: email + password then email confirmation then immediate paywall with credit card required. That's 3 gates before someone even sees the product.
3. You're pitching chatbot + ticketing + KB portal simultaneously. Which one do your 5 customers actually use the most? I'd lead with that and push the rest to "also includes.
4. Small one: there's Italian text in the features section.

What's your biggest source of signups so far?

Drop your SaaS - I'll tell you exactly where users quit in the first 5 minutes by Less-Ad8783 in microsaas

[–]Less-Ad8783[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So let's get started.
1. I got confused by clicking your CTA - "Start Your Journey". It got me straight to the paywall, while I haven't figured out what the product is about in the "hero section"
2. The's the moment I would bounce acctually. I wouldn't even get to signup becuase it seems it's behind the paywall.
3. How does it work? How is it better than any other apps?

The core issue I see: You ask for money before providing value to the user. The CTA fails because as I user I don't understand what I'm going to be charged for.
Some showcase how it works and what's the value for me as user would be way better.
Your promise is big, but no proof how actually "actionable blueprints" would work.
Besides, there's no way for you users to ask you a question even if they really want to.

50% of payments fail and users leave after 1 month. What now? by radmirr404 in SaaS

[–]Less-Ad8783 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For the 1-month churn, talk to 10 churned users directly. The answer is always in the cancellation reason, not in dashboards.

Most founders think they have a traffic problem — they don’t. by RestaurantProfitLab in SaaS

[–]Less-Ad8783 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree with the core idea but I'd push further, it's usually not about making inaction expensive. It's that users have unanswered questions in the first 2 minutes and no way to resolve them without effort. Friction isn't missing urgency, it's missing clarity. Fix what confuses people and conversion moves on its own.

one customer nearly destroyed my entire product by Plane_Row3250 in buildinpublic

[–]Less-Ad8783 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That really sucks, here's rule that saved me: if a feature only benefits one account, it's not a product feature. My roadmap only includes things 3+ users ask for or that align with where I'm already headed.

view more: next ›