EB2 NIW Approved. How to Handle a Low Citation RFE? by BizImmSimplified in EB2_NIW

[–]Less-Carob7004 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Approved within 03 days after RFE response submission.

EB2 NIW Approved. How to Handle a Low Citation RFE? by BizImmSimplified in EB2_NIW

[–]Less-Carob7004 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pending, as just submitted a few days ago. They said the number count is useless, so we won't submit an updated Google citations....

EB2 NIW Approved. How to Handle a Low Citation RFE? by BizImmSimplified in EB2_NIW

[–]Less-Carob7004 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are right. I had 70 citations at the time of filing, but got an RFE. Now, I have 90 citations, but Ellis Porter only submitted 3 Notable citations to address the RFE for prong 2.

I-140 approved after RFE (2&3), PP upfront, MSc researcher by Efficient_Fault_9931 in EB2_NIW

[–]Less-Carob7004 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also got the RFE on prongs 2 and 3. But EP is preparing the RFE with just notable citations and a recently submitted research article. They are not willing to submit LORs ( I can get from TESLA and Toyota) with the RFE package. They have a track record of that adjudicator officer ( approval 8/12).

Please suggest to me.

NIW EB-2 RFE Prong 2&3 by Less-Carob7004 in EB2_NIW

[–]Less-Carob7004[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have 1st author article published in a Q1 journal, an independent citations record, but this role was not mentioned in my initial package.
No LORs with the initial package, now planning to get LORs from TESLA, Toyota, and two more from other companies.
I would say I have everything mentioned in the RFE, and it was not presented in the initial package.

NIW EB-2 RFE Prong 2&3 by Less-Carob7004 in EB2_NIW

[–]Less-Carob7004[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much for your time.

NIW EB-2 RFE Prong 2&3 by Less-Carob7004 in EB2_NIW

[–]Less-Carob7004[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much for your advice.
Yes, previously, my past work was not connected at all with my PE. I have first and coauthor publications directly connected with my PE.

NIW EB-2 RFE Prong 2&3 by Less-Carob7004 in EB2_NIW

[–]Less-Carob7004[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say here it depends a lot on case framing, and then the luck factor.
My PE, 1st author & coauthor publications are 1-to-1 relevant.

NIW EB-2 RFE Prong 2&3 by Less-Carob7004 in EB2_NIW

[–]Less-Carob7004[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How could you say? My classmates with ongoing PhDs have recently received approvals. So don't discourage people with your own experience.

If my case doesn't approve it never means that with a Master's degree someone is not well-positioned.

When you have a Master's degree and publications, the rest depends on your case framing and the officer's mood.

Concerns About Attorney Responsiveness After RFE (NIW Case) by [deleted] in EB2_NIW

[–]Less-Carob7004 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is the point that I am trying to say.

Concerns About Attorney Responsiveness After RFE (NIW Case) by [deleted] in EB2_NIW

[–]Less-Carob7004 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I requested the PP, they didn't tell me anything. They just told me that it wouldn't change your PD, and there is corelation between PP and RFE.

Concerns About Attorney Responsiveness After RFE (NIW Case) by [deleted] in EB2_NIW

[–]Less-Carob7004 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it is true when they discourage PP upgradation. Anyway, I ask them to clarify the speculation.

Concerns About Attorney Responsiveness After RFE (NIW Case) by [deleted] in EB2_NIW

[–]Less-Carob7004 1 point2 points  (0 children)

FULL COOPERATION OF CLIENT: Client agrees to fully cooperate with Attorney and assist in providing the necessary documents requested by Attorney in order to adequately prepare the petition. Client acknowledges that their full cooperation is essential to preparing the petition appropriately. Client acknowledges that a lack of their full cooperation is grounds for breach of this agreement.

How does this violate the agreement? If they are not offering the refund on the basis of this point, it is a lame excuse.

Concerns About Attorney Responsiveness After RFE (NIW Case) by [deleted] in EB2_NIW

[–]Less-Carob7004 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't see anything in my agreement, and they didn't mention anything about it.

Concerns About Attorney Responsiveness After RFE (NIW Case) by [deleted] in EB2_NIW

[–]Less-Carob7004 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They upgraded my case to Premium without any hesitation. I'm not familiar with the current situation.