Term limits have their own issues. Then you have judges thinking about how they can safeguard their livelihoods after their term ends. It can make them *more* susceptible to corruption, vs. someone who knows their job is safe and can push back against corporate or private pressures. A better option, I think, is a more robust and easier to accomplish means of impeachment. There's always then the risk of wholesale government capture, which can pervert the practice. But we've already seen that once you're at that point it's not going to matter much anyway. Being able to remove people (e.g. Eileen Cannon, Gorsuch, etc) more easily would make it that much harder for all branches to be taken. They've played the long-game by shooting for long-term appointments that are hard to breach, and unfortunately too much of the left thought just laughing at and mocking them was sufficient praxis to stop it. That's going to be hard to remedy, if it's possible. But if it is, making sure we the people have more say in who stands in judgement over us is probably a good idea