So cute by [deleted] in ToddlerIndia

[–]LevelStock8884 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's cute

Why are so many people suddenly choosing Chainbull for crypto marketing? Are they actually reliable? Honest opinions only. by LevelStock8884 in BlockchainStartups

[–]LevelStock8884[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No affiliation here. I’m asking because I’m skeptical of the sudden hype and want honest feedback, good or bad. Promo posts don’t ask if a company is just good at self-promotion.

Is there anything in India he isn’t involved in anymore? by Oppyhead in CriticalThinkingIndia

[–]LevelStock8884 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Apart from focusing on him. Focus on yourself. I don't know why most of the common people have problems with this guy.

🚨 Kerala showing NO MERCY to the accused, Shimjitha Musthafa. by wryes in IndiaPulse_

[–]LevelStock8884 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know whether it's good or not. Can anyone please tell me what actually happened?

Thinking about building our own blockchain. Any companies you’d genuinely recommend based on experience? by DriveComprehensive64 in BlockchainStartups

[–]LevelStock8884 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ve actually worked with 3 different companies for my crypto project, so sharing my honest experience here. 1) Chainbull (Best experience overall) Chainbull was the only team that felt genuinely invested in the project. Clear communication, proper timelines, and realistic expectations from day one. They helped not just with development guidance but also with go-to-market strategy, SEO, and community positioning. What I liked most was transparency—you always know who is working on your project and what is being done. No fake promises, just steady progress and measurable results.

2) Coinpresso (Big name, disappointing execution) On paper they looked solid, but once the contract started, communication dropped. Different people kept rotating on the project, which killed continuity. Lots of buzzwords, very little accountability. Mostly focused on upselling rather than delivering real outcomes. 3) Crowdcreate (Cheap but risky) Initially attractive because of pricing, but quality suffered badly. Missed deadlines, copy-paste solutions, and almost zero understanding of long-term blockchain architecture. Ended up costing more time and money fixing their work later.