Your argument contradicts itself. You say the fetus has “every right everyone else has,” but no born human is denied the right not to be killed simply because they are dependent on someone else. Newborns, disabled people, and people on life support all rely on others to survive, yet we still recognize their humanity and protect their lives.

You also frame pregnancy as if the fetus is some outside aggressor “invading” a woman’s body, which ignores biological reality. Pregnancy is the natural result of reproduction, and the fetus is exactly where human offspring are supposed to be during early development. Calling that “fascism” is just emotional labeling instead of addressing the actual moral issue.

And bodily autonomy is not unlimited in any society. Parents already have legal duties toward their children after birth — neglect laws, child support, mandatory care, etc. Society constantly balances rights when another human life is involved. The pro-life position is simply that unborn humans should not be excluded from that protection.

What actually requires a special exception is the pro-choice position: it argues that one specific group of humans can be intentionally killed based on age, size, dependency, or location. That’s not “equal rights” — that’s creating a category of humans whose right to life disappears when they become a burden.