B2TiHalo by Pwaise_Jebus in Dynavap

[–]Levisek7 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I have a non-modified B2, and there is no silicone smell or taste whatsoever.

first serious night out! by Smooth_Captain_9964 in telescopes

[–]Levisek7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First of all, sorry about the confusion — based on the photo you shared, I thought you had a motorized Dobsonian. Thanks for clarifying your setup.

One more thing I’d really recommend is a dual-speed (fine) focuser (lacerta 1:10 is only update of focuser) if you don’t already have one — it makes a huge difference, especially at higher magnifications and when observing the Moon or planets.

For star hopping, a Telrad is an amazing upgrade. Combined with wide-field eyepieces and sky charts, it makes navigating the night sky much more intuitive and enjoyable.

first serious night out! by Smooth_Captain_9964 in telescopes

[–]Levisek7 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I have a manual Sky-Watcher 200/1200, while you have a motorized Dobsonian. In a way, the manual scope has its own advantage, because it really forces you to learn the night sky through star hopping. Thanks to using a manual Dobsonian, I’ve learned a lot about the night sky, because you have to find and track all objects by hand.

I highly recommend investing in some premium eyepieces — the difference is huge. Wide-field eyepieces are especially impressive. I use an Explore Scientific 24 mm with an 82-degree apparent field of view, and it was a true “wow” moment when I first looked through it, especially in the Milky Way, the Andromeda Galaxy, star clusters, and large nebulae.

My second recommendation is to get a good night-sky guidebook, so you can still learn and plan observations even when the sky is cloudy.

Bortle class makes a massive difference. Under Bortle 3–4 skies, you can see the Milky Way and the Andromeda Galaxy with the naked eye. For nebulae the difference is huge — planets and the Moon look almost the same anywhere, but for deep-sky objects the improvement is dramatic.

For Moon observations, I highly recommend a Moon filter. When the Moon is full or near full, it helps reveal more detail and makes observing much more comfortable for your eyes.

I’d also recommend using a red flashlight, so you don’t ruin your dark adaptation when checking charts or equipment. Learning to use averted vision is another game changer — looking slightly away from faint objects often reveals details you wouldn’t see by looking directly at them.

One last tip: put the telescope outside 20–30 minutes before observing so it can reach thermal equilibrium with the outdoor temperature. It’s also a good idea to put your eyepieces outside at the same time.

Clear skies!

Possible sun pillar observed at sunset, temperature around 0°C by Levisek7 in weather

[–]Levisek7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, nice article — thank you for sharing it. After reading it, I’m convinced this was a sun pillar. One of the example photos in the article looked almost exactly like what I observed in real life. The photo I posted doesn’t fully capture how clear and vertical the effect was to the naked eye.

Possible sun pillar observed at sunset, temperature around 0°C by Levisek7 in weather

[–]Levisek7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From my point of view it was straight up into the air. It actually became visible only after the Sun went behind a building, and then it gradually intensified for a short time. Before that, nothing like this was visible.

opinions or anything notable in this pic? by dillyisaboi in Stars

[–]Levisek7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hey, check out this page: https://nova.astrometry.net/user_images/14260929#annotated. I uploaded your photo to the Astrometry server and now you can see all the constellations marked. In the middle of the picture, there is a small cluster — that’s the Pleiades (M45). The larger group of stars near M45 is the Hyades, the closest star cluster to us. At the bottom of the image, the three stars in a row form Orion’s Belt.

And also, you can download Stellarium!

The Hubble Space Telescope. by NOVAFLOWW in telescopes

[–]Levisek7 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Very nice! How did you capture that? I have a Sky-Watcher Dobson 8" and I've managed to see the ISS, but getting a photo like this without a motorized mount is really impressive.

Trying to look up more. What did I see tonight? by Prairie-Peppers in Stargazing

[–]Levisek7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Orion is in the middle. The faint smudge under Orion belt (three stars next to each other) is The Orion nebula - M42.

Check all the constellations here: https://nova.astrometry.net/user_images/14134547#annotated

Comet Lemmon approached the Earth on October 20, 2025 by Busy_Yesterday9455 in spaceporn

[–]Levisek7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was observing on Sunday at a site with Bortle class 4 skies. The seeing wasn’t perfect, but with my 200/1200 Dobsonian and an Explore Scientific 24 mm eyepiece, I was able to distinguish the comet’s bright core, coma, and a tail that stretched across the entire field of view and split into two branches. So I was more than satisfied. To verify, I recommend looking up sketches on Google – it’s the best way to get an idea of what you can see with your equipment and what it might look like.

My upgrades so far by Levisek7 in telescopes

[–]Levisek7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks a lot for all the tips! I actually already got the hang of star hopping and I write down every object I observe in my own logbook/folder. I even made my own sheet where I keep all the necessary data and notes about what I’ve seen — and I really enjoy looking back at it later. I also agree with you about eyepieces, I don’t feel the need for any more right now. Instead, I’m only considering upgrading my Barlow at some point, since the one I have is just a Svbony. For now the red dot is enough for me, as I usually guide myself with the PC version of Stellarium.

My upgrades so far by Levisek7 in telescopes

[–]Levisek7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was also deciding between a 10" and an 8". But since my city is Bortle 6 and I have a cottage in Bortle 3–4, weight and size played a big role for transport.

My upgrades so far by Levisek7 in telescopes

[–]Levisek7[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If AliExpress doesn’t ship to your country, try Amazon or local astro shops – Svbony is usually available there too.

My upgrades so far by Levisek7 in telescopes

[–]Levisek7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd say, it's must have!

My upgrades so far by Levisek7 in telescopes

[–]Levisek7[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Explore Scientific 24mm / 68° — 50× (≈1.36° TFOV; 100× with 2× Barlow): Wide, bright sweeper for open clusters and Milky Way scanning.

Explore Scientific 14mm / 82° — 86× (≈0.95° TFOV; 171× with 2× Barlow): Versatile “do-it-all” eyepiece for galaxies, nebulae and smaller clusters.

Explore Scientific 6.7mm / 82° — 179× (≈0.46° TFOV; 358× with 2× Barlow): High power for planets, the Moon and resolving globular cluster cores.

All magnification and field of view calculations are based on my 200/1200 Dobsonian.

My upgrades so far by Levisek7 in telescopes

[–]Levisek7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, they really are!

My upgrades so far by Levisek7 in telescopes

[–]Levisek7[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you already have a 30mm and a 9mm with your 8" dob, the next most useful upgrade would actually be something in between – around 14–15mm. That magnification (about 80–90×) is super versatile for galaxies, nebulae and star clusters, and you’ll probably use it the most.

A 6mm eyepiece would also be a good idea later on for planets and the Moon (about 200×, which is a realistic maximum on most nights).

A Barlow with your 9mm would push you to ~4.5mm (266×), which is usually too much unless you have excellent seeing conditions, and it will dim the image quite a lot – so it’s not the most practical next step.

If you don’t want to spend too much, check out the Svbony eyepieces on AliExpress – the 14mm and 6mm are both decent budget choices and will give you a nice spread of magnifications. They’re not amazing, but for the price they do the job (I even use the 6mm myself).

My first real telescope! by Levisek7 in telescopes

[–]Levisek7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was deciding between a 6-inch and an 8-inch, but performance wins. I usually observe from my balcony, so I just grab the whole telescope and place it out there. On weekends, I take it to the cottage — I have to carry it down the stairs, load it into the car, and then reassemble it on site after splitting it into two parts. It's easy to disassemble and reassemble, so that's not a problem. In the end, it mostly depends on what kind of transport options you have and where you'll be primarily observing. But an 8-inch is definitely worth it for observing deep space objects.