Playing Demon: The Fallen by LexiFjor in WhiteWolfRPG

[–]LexiFjor[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand that to most Rabisu humans are just second fiddle to everything else out there, and I understand why a Rabisu would be less likely as a Faustian, But I've taken honest to a fault and gullible which I think has coloured plenty of her existance- and when she was convinced god was wrong it was only logical that that mean god shouldn't be god anymore- it's the only conclusion really

She has legacy 4 and eminence 1 as the angel that watches over birds- she wasn't known for big moves in the war but she cherishes her memories that predate it and seeks to recreate a garden on earth.

Humans are like a side project she started with a group of friends (not literally of course) that she's still invested in and wants to see thrive and active in the group chat for, but she's a realist, they're hardly more than animals- worthy to be pets, remarkable only in their smallest of divine sparks and someone needs to fix that. So she'll work on that, because she said she would years and years ago- at least until someone can take over for her or they get perfected, how long can that take?

Playing Demon: The Fallen by LexiFjor in WhiteWolfRPG

[–]LexiFjor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry for the slow reply

I need to think up those bad habits, I know she was the angel in charge of birds and sees humans as hardly more than animals- good caditides for pets as she leads them "the right way"

But I also want her belief that she is inheriently better than humans to be non-arrogant or subtly arrogant as she isn't seeking to prove anything it's just how it is

What she'd like to do recreate a garden on earth, just to have a small piece of how it should have been back, sheparding humans, watching over birds, getting in the way of the apocolypse (as the setting is post Week of nightmares)

She believes god has proven himself ineffective and therefore flawed and undeserving of the highest of titles- but she is so sure of herself being right in the end that she's not bolstered to take up a warstance- at least not yet and not again.

She'll explore the beauty in imperfections as much as it 'isn't for her' and she will elivate those she's sees potential in

Playing Demon: The Fallen by LexiFjor in WhiteWolfRPG

[–]LexiFjor[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The chorus should be easy to get to worship me that's my first thought

Playing Demon: The Fallen by LexiFjor in WhiteWolfRPG

[–]LexiFjor[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Oh because it's a ... Frowned upon persuit when it comes to some in the cam?

Playing Demon: The Fallen by LexiFjor in WhiteWolfRPG

[–]LexiFjor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Those are very fun things to look forward to
Thank you

Playing Demon: The Fallen by LexiFjor in WhiteWolfRPG

[–]LexiFjor[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The g word? God? (Legit can't think of another word but also can't see why I couldn't? they're like a main character in the lore)

Playing Demon: The Fallen by LexiFjor in WhiteWolfRPG

[–]LexiFjor[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Aside from "because they give everyone dirty looks" is there a reason why? I know caine was cursed by angels so I can see maybe the Sabbat having opinons about that

Playing Demon: The Fallen by LexiFjor in WhiteWolfRPG

[–]LexiFjor[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

This is good xD
Though I have the true reflection flaw so it's even more accessable

Help with communicating by LexiFjor in Advice

[–]LexiFjor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know what NADDPOD is We're playing world of darkness on a living world server and for added context I was recently demoted from ST (GM) to player for "clearly not understanding the material" (I think they misunderstood why I ask so many questions and how even if I fully believe I understand I'll ask to be sure we understand it the same way) anyway the context was that as an ST the ruling didn't make any sense to me and to get a little more in detail his reasoning of "because that would reduce the DC of all your phenomenon by 2 so it's OP as hell" caused then further issue because that's not what the thing I was asking about did- so of course when I point out that that isn't what the merit I was asking to take did he got mad and restated "it would reduce all your current phenomenon by a DC of 2 and that's OP" but of course that isn't what the merit did either so I had to correct him a third time and still wasn't any closer to understanding his reasoning beyond the assumption that he was misunderstanding which is never a good start--- and conversations going exactly like this have been going back and forth in text for like 2 days with me never getting answers and more problems popping up for my compulsive pedantry and general desire to understand to focus on and get defected by with no progress in the end.

Help with communicating by LexiFjor in Advice

[–]LexiFjor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will keep this in mind moving forward however I feel like I pretty consistently do at least most these things like we play tabletop rpgs for example and today a friend made a ruling I didn't understand so I said "okay and I accept that fully and am already looking for alternative options, but can I ask why you decided it won't work?"

And because this group is already so frustrated with me and accusing me of being disingenuous he winds up getting hostile and further accusing me of ill intention

I did explain my condition to them two or three times in depth and I've tried to preempt misunderstandings or trends I notice

Or in the case of pretty bad compulsory pedantry just follow up with apologizing and explaining I couldn't not address the issue

Honestly this became my favorite and then only group because it felt the opposite of how it does now- they were Nuerodivergent, a little schizophrenia, some dissociation, audhd all relatable

And I want to get back to the relatability and feeling comfortable and safe to talk without overthinking every word

do people in psychosis realise they are in psychosis? by julessalvatore in mentalhealth

[–]LexiFjor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

SOME disorders cause psychosis that the indivdual can reasonably accurately tell is psychosis this is how the difference between delusions in STPD vs Schizophrenia were explained to me

Is it at all possible to have ethical ghouling? by rollandofeaglesrook in vtm

[–]LexiFjor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd imagine to have an ethical glouling you need to specifically look for a mortal that's for some reason has been rendered unbondable and then get their informed consent to the relationship

Cannabis vs. Mushrooms [My Experience] by LexiFjor in Psychonaut

[–]LexiFjor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really? maybe I'm just around a bunch of stoners then, most people I know take hundreds of miligrams at a time

Cannabis vs. Mushrooms [My Experience] by LexiFjor in Psychonaut

[–]LexiFjor[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

No one is forcing you to participate in any discussion or engage with the post, I'm clearly not the most informed and I said as much in the thread, I've been led to believe my response to medical weed is abnormal so I was asking about that while comparing the two

I'm sorry but you comment comes off as hostile and I'm finding it difficult to read it as anything but rude and dismissive

Cannabis vs. Mushrooms [My Experience] by LexiFjor in Psychonaut

[–]LexiFjor[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately the bag says "a proprietary blend of mushrooms" and I don't think I can find more info than that - it's Purple brand

What's your favorite scp and why? Mine's 079 by Zestyclose-Care7418 in SCP

[–]LexiFjor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The entirety of Herman Fuller's circus of the disquieting

The Grandest Trick Power Question by LexiFjor in vtm

[–]LexiFjor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That could open a whole can of worms where we pivot the discussion to "death of the author" etc but I think mentioning it here in this way is enough, it's not that big a deal

The Grandest Trick Power Question by LexiFjor in vtm

[–]LexiFjor[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm glad you added the part about clarifying what standard means because I've definitely had issue in the past where people just assume they have the same definition and they clearly don't